بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Author: Leslie Schaffer

  • Gratitude, Journaling, and Gifts that Come from the Soul

    Gratitude, Journaling, and Gifts that Come from the Soul

    Muslims often talk about the importance of being thankful. That’s not surprising since there are many instances of the words “thanks,” “thankful,” “grateful,” and “gratitude” being used in the Qur’an. And most know the principle stated in the following verse: “If you are thankful, I will grant you increase” (Qur’an14:7).It is the sunnah, and standard practice, that when a Muslim is asked how he or she is, that they answer “alhamdulillah,” “all praise is due to Allah,” which certainly expresses appreciation for Allah SWT and the bounties that He has provided human beings.

    When gratitude infuses our hearing, sight, intelligence, and affection, all things “come to life,” at times revealing something of their mystic essence

    Like any habit of thought, attitude, or behavior, being thankful can become second nature. In one sense that is good, as the dictionary tells us that second nature is “an acquired behavior or trait that is so long practiced as to seem innate.” That’s good! But second nature has an underbelly that’s not so good, as it is also defined as “a habit or tendency that is so deeply ingrained as to appear automatic.” When something becomes “automatic,” the danger is that we stop paying deliberate, mindful attention to it. I might, therefore, be thankful for the good things in my life but it’s in a generalized, free-floating, surface, way. Then when the subject of gratitude comes up, I might think “Oh yes, I am grateful for the good things in my life.” But how much deep and detailed attention do I pay to my experience of gratitude? Is it possible to feel gratitude the way an artist or photographer “feels”nature? Ralph Waldo Emerson, 19th century lecturer, essayist, and poet, wrote in Nature, “Crossing a bare common, in snow puddles, at twilight, under a clouded sky, without having in my thoughts any occurrence of special good fortune, I have enjoyed a perfect exhilaration…”

    Can we also experience such a primal and unadulterated connection to life and world thatwe are inclined to gratitude in the mundane occurrences of our everyday lives? Can we even feel thankful in times of lack or suffering? About this, Emerson wrote, “Cultivate the habit of being grateful for every good thing that comes to you, and to give thanks continuously. And because all things have contributed to your advancement, you should include all things in your gratitude.” This idea that “all things have contributed” to one’s advancement, that all things can accrue to one’s benefit, is expressed beautifully in the hadith, “How wonderful is the affair of the believer, for all his affairs are good, and that does not apply to anyone but the believer. If something good happens to him, he is grateful, and that is good for him; and if something bad happens to him, he bears it with patience, and that is good for him” (Sahih Muslim).

    Rabia al-Adawiya, born in Basra (in what is now Iraq), between the years 95 A.H. and 99 A.H. (around 717 C.E.), was a major spiritual influence in the classical Islamic world, with a reputation of exceptional religious devotion. She was once asked how to know if you are content with Allah’s decree. She replied, “When you feel the same joy in periods of tribulation as you do during periods of blessing.” While we may not be of such purity of heart that we feel joy even in the midst of tribulation, we can strive to, at a minimum, feel gratitude no matter what our situation. For, as the Qur’an tells us, “God is responsive to gratitude” (2:158). And as stated above, that “If you are thankful, I will grant you increase” (14:7). Yet, Allah SWT declares that “…few are the truly grateful [even] among My servants!” (34:13). And the Qur’an is full or exhortation about those who are ungrateful. Muhammad Asad points out in the commentary in his English translation of the Qur’an that, according to Zamakhshari, “truly grateful [to God] is only he who realizes his inability to render adequate thanks to Him.” And how easy it is to hear the many verses about gratitude, or the lack thereof, and yet not really stop to reflect deeply upon the meaning. It may be that something in the conscience keeps us from really digging below the surface meaning because we don’t want to do the necessary work to change sinful ways or counter-productive habits like quickness to anger. Or being impatient or envious. These are traits or habits that contravene gratitude. We may not consciously think about those connections and how that applies in our own lives — how getting easily resentful or aggressive or bossy or compulsive or greedy or harsh or inconsiderate or intolerant or irresponsible or overcritical or blaming or patronizing or rude are attestations of lapsing gratitude — but subconsciously we know it. Yet only if we dig below the surface, can we avoid superficiality in our understanding and the perils of self-delusion.

    The Qur’an alerts us: “Do they not ponder the Qur’an in order to understand its deep meaning or is it that their hearts are locked up?” (Qur’an 47:24). Imam Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali wrote in reference to this verse, “I then wish to rouse you from your sleep, you who recite the Qur’an to a great length, and who absorb some of its outward meanings and sentences. How long will you ramble on the shore? Is it not your duty to sail the ocean of these meanings in order to see their wonders, and to dive into their depths so that you might obtain their jewels? Do you not feel ashamed by your persistence in staying on their shores and looking at outward appearances?”

    Dictionary Definition

    The definition of gratitude is “the quality or feeling of being grateful or thankful;” “warmly or deeply appreciative of kindness or benefits received.” Interestingly, the thesaurus lists as synonyms of gratitude words such as appreciativeness, acknowledgement, obligation, thanks, indebtedness, praise, and responsiveness. These all add some scope to my understanding of gratitude.

    Adding Dimension to the Definition

    In the commentary on a verse in Surah An-Nisa’ — “Why would God cause you to suffer [for your past sins] if you are grateful and attain to belief, seeing that God is always responsive to gratitude, all-knowing?” (Qur’an 4:147) — Muhammad Asad states, “The gratitude spoken of here is of a general nature —a feeling of thankfulness for being alive and endowed with what is described as a ‘soul’: a feeling which often leads man to the realization that this boon of life and consciousness is not accidental, and thus, in a logical process of thought, [leads] to belief in God. According to Zamakhshari, this is the reason why ‘gratitude’ is placed before ‘belief’ in the structure of the above sentence.”

    Asad is pointing out that gratitude is connected to the realization that life itself, and consciousness, are blessing and benefit, and a veritable baseline for gratitude. Being conscious is having awareness of one’s own existence, an awareness that is fed by sensations, thoughts, emotions, perceptions of one’s surroundings, and experiences in everyday life and in relationship to other people. Realizing that life and consciousness have meaning and purpose, that they are divine provisions given to human beings, we are led to nothing if not gratitude. “It is He who brought you forth from the wombs of your mothers when you knew nothing, and He gave you hearing and sight and intelligence and affection so that you may give thanks”(Qur’an16: 78). The scope of “hearing” and “sight” and “intelligence” and “affection” encompasses, in the most simple and direct way, the entire being of the human creature. And Shaikh Hamza Yusuf has said about “the one who submits their entire being”: “This means that the future is not a concern for them, and the past is not a worry for them. They are living in the present…children are very much in the moment, they do not worry or care about their past or future. The arif’s [gnostic’s, i.e., the one with spiritual knowledge] heart is like the child. Children’s hearts are in submission. They are in tawheed.”

    With a heart in submission and being grounded in tawheed, one can see with fresh eyes, rather than with eyes that see nothing but the commonplace, as if all things are ordinary, banal, and uninspiring. Failing to see with fresh eyes, we risk falling into spiritual ingratitude: “We can be thankful to a friend for a few acres or a little money; and yet for the freedom and command of the whole earth, and for the great benefits of our being, our life, health, and reason, we look upon ourselves as under no obligation,” wrote Marcus Annaeus Seneca, a writer and orator of ancient Rome. But when gratitude infuses our hearing, sight, intelligence, and affection, all things “come to life,” at times revealing something of their mystic essence. Then when I see a canoe floating on glistening smoothness, surrendered to the gentle ripples of a lake, I might be reminded of the peace that emanates from our own surrender.

    Being in tawheed is simple but profound spiritual knowledge of the One who conferred upon humankind the bounty of life and unparalleled consciousness — the ability to appreciate the beauty of nature and the innocence of children, and the veritable cornucopia of other wondrous things.This profound human capacity of awareness, perception, attentiveness, reason, and intuition —with their potential for both understanding and devotion —what is yielded from such abundance of the heart must be gratitude.

    Gratitude: The Antidote to Self-Glory

    With capacity for self-awareness, as integral part of human consciousness, and dedication to continual deepening of self-knowledge, we might avoid the pitfalls that attach to times of gain or success.

    “And thus it is if We let him taste ease and plenty after hardship has visited him, he is sure to say, ‘Gone is all affliction from me!’ For, behold, he is given to vain exultation, and glories only in himself” (Qur’an 11:10).

    How easy it is for the person who enjoys success and good fortune to feel entitled, and to forget that his bounties are due to the grace of God and that many others contributed to his success, including parents, teachers, mentors, and a myriad of people he doesn’t even know. Elizabeth Warren, when she was running for the Senate in 2011, spoke about the delusion of those who acquire wealth and think it is due entirely to their own efforts. She said, “You built a factory out there? Good for you. But I want to be clear: you moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for; you hired workers the rest of us paid to educate; you were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn’t have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory, and hire someone to protect against this, because of the work the rest of us did.” She continued: “Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific… God bless. Keep a big hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.” A Chinese proverb points to the importance of recognizing the unseen multitude who contribute to our survival, happiness, and comfort:“When eating bamboo sprouts, remember the man who planted them.”

    The Qur’an points out that the pretense and delusion of self-sufficiency easily afflict man: “Proclaim! And your Lord is Most Bountiful – He Who taught by the pen, taught man that which he knew not. Nay, but man does transgress all bounds, in that he looks upon himself as self-sufficient” (Quran 96:3-7). Dr. Robert Emmons, a professor of psychology at the University of California, Davis, whose research focuses on “the interface of personality psychology, the psychology of emotion and the psychology of religion,” writes,“…we are never truly self-sufficient. Humans need other people to grow our food and heal our injuries; we need love, and for that we need family, partners, friends, and pets… Seeing with grateful eyes requires that we see the web of interconnection in which we alternate between being givers and receivers.” He says, “The humble person says that life is a gift to be grateful for, not a right to be claimed.”

    Gratitude in Times of Difficulty or Sorrow

    The person filled with gratitude would believe that, as Emerson says, all things contributed to his advancement and therefore he should include all things in his gratitude, even those things that make him suffer. The grateful one would live by the hadith mentioned above so that when “something bad happens to him, he bears it with patience, and that is good for him.” The thankful person, who lives with gratitude as a life theme, would be as Umar, (R), who said, “There was no single difficulty I faced or calamity which struck me, but that I had four bounties bestowed on me by Allah (SWT). First, that the calamity was not in my deen (religion); second, that it was not worse than it was; third, that I was not deprived of contentment and surrender to Allah (SWT); and fourth, that I yearned for the reward from Allah (SWT).”

    Gratitude for the Bounties of Allah SWT

    Al-Junayd said, “I once heard al-Sari saying, ‘Because to give thanks for blessings is itself a blessing, one can never cease to give thanks.’ “ We can never run out of benefits, blessings, and bounties for which to give thanks to God. Here are just a few examples that are cited in the Qur’an, reminding us that it is Allah who has:

    made the earth a couch and the heavens a canopy (2:22)

    provided gardens and fruits (6:141)

    subjected all things to humanity’s use (31:20)

    favored humankind through the service of animals (16:80-91)

    fashioned man perfectly, giving him due proportion (82:7)

    given human beings hearing sight, intelligence, and affection (16:78)

    created the senses (23:78)

    taught the use of the pen and taught man that which he knew not (96:4-5)

    favored man with speech (55:3-4)

    provided a Criterion between right and wrong (25:1)

    given wealth and sustenance (3:27)

    enabled man to travel through land and sea (10:22)

    sent Revelation (6:91-92)

    provided guidance (2:38)

    offered healing, guidance, and mercy (17:80-82)

    sent winds and rain (25:48-50)

    supplied flowing water (67:30)

     

    “…And If you would count the blessings of Allah you would not be able to count them…” (Qur’an 14:34). And Imam ash-Shafi’i points out, “To be able to thank Allah for a blessing is a blessing within itself.”

    Some Ahadith About Gratitude

    Prophet Muhammad (S) used to recite long prayers at night, as Aisha (R) reported: “The Prophet used to offer prayer at night [for such a long time] that his feet used to crack. I said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! Why do you do it since Allah has forgiven you your faults of the past and those to follow?’ He said: ‘Shouldn’t I love to be a thankful servant (of Allah)?’” (Bukhari).

    Another hadith shows the all-embracing responsiveness of Allah SWT to gratitude. Al-Qasim ibn Muhammad reported from A’ishah (R) that the Prophet (S) said: “No blessing is bestowed on a servant [of Allah] and he realizes that it is from Allah, but the reward of giving gratitude for it is written for him… No man buys a garment with his own money then puts it on and thanks Allah, but Allah will have forgiven him all his wrong action before the garment reaches his knees.”

    The Prophet (S) also said: “Allah is pleased with His servant if, when he eats something, he thanks Allah for it, and when he drinks something, he thanks Allah for it” (Muslim).

    Studies About Gratitude

    Cultivating gratitude does not mean that we don’t feel anger or resentment or disappointment. Dr. Robert Emmons discusses the paradox of gratitude, pointing out that no one feels grateful for losing a job or being diagnosed with a serious health condition, or any of the countless other challenges human beings face. He says, “Life is suffering. No amount of positive thinking exercises will change this truth.” He continues, “Processing a life experience through a grateful lens does not mean denying negativity. It is not a form of superficial happiology. Instead, it means realizing the power you have to transform an obstacle into an opportunity. It means reframing a loss into a potential gain, recasting negativity into positive channels for gratitude.”

    Researchers at UC Davis have found through their studies on gratitude the following:

    People who are thankful for the good things in their lives do not deny or ignore the negative aspects of life but rather put them in a healthy perspective and strive to focus on the positive.

    Grateful people report more positive emotions, satisfaction with their lives, greater energy and optimism;and they report lower levels of depression and stress.

    A predisposition of gratitude enhances the experience of pleasant emotions.

    Grateful individuals are more empathic and are better able to see things through others’ perspectives.

    Grateful individuals are more likely to believe in the interconnectedness of people and all things in life and feel a sense of responsibility to the welfare of others.

    Grateful individuals are in general less materialistic.

    Grateful people are less envious of others.

    Those who regularly attend religious services and engage in religious activities are more likely to be grateful.

     

    Other studies have found that grateful people are more inclined to take better care of themselves physically and mentally; engage in regular physical exercise; eat in a more balanced and healthy way; have improved mental alertness; cope more effectively with stress; have stronger immune systems; and have a lesser tendency to aggression.

    In a study done in neuro-psychology by Dr. Rollin McCraty, director of research for the Institute of HeartMath, individuals were taught to practice feeling gratitude or appreciation for the good things in their lives in order to self-generate a regular and healthy heart rhythm (referred to as heart rhythm coherence).They were instructed to recall a past positive memory that elicits warm, pleasant feelings. Over time and with practice, most were able to experience feelings of gratitude or appreciation without reference to the originative memory, and thus self-generate a healthy heart rhythm.

    Gratitude Begets Generosity and is Contagious

    In a study done to explore whether gratitude begets generosity, researchers gave each student participant an exercise to do on a laptop. But the computer had been disabled. For some of the participants it was arranged that another student would appear in the room for some other purpose but would notice the study participant struggling with the computer and offer to look at it. They, of course, knew how to “fix” the problem and did so. Those students who had been helped were more likely to volunteer to help someone else with an unrelated task. The study concluded that gratitude begets generosity.

    Gratitude Improves Relationships

    Thankfulness (shukr) is an essential part of happy relationships. According to Imam Ibn Qayyim, there are two types of rights owed to Allah (SWT): the fulfillment of His commands and showing shukr to Him. And showing shukr to people is part of showing shukr to Allah (SWT). The Prophet (S) said: “Whoever does not thank people, does not thank Allah.” This is a very profound hadeeth. It inspires us to express our thanks to other people as a daily practice, especially to our spouses and family members. Gratitude improves relationships and spreads goodness by sending a simple message of love or caring or appreciation, not only to the recipient of the thanks, but also to those who witness it. A sage once said, “The fragrance of flowers spreads only in the direction of the wind. But gratitude spreads goodness in all directions.” This is shown so poignantly by the writing of a girl in a 4th grade class when the teacher asked the students to write a paragraph about what they think love is. The girl wrote:

    “When my grandma got Alzheimer’s and couldn’t make tea anymore, my grandpa made the tea each afternoon and picked flowers in the garden to put on the table. He would also make sure that grandma’s favorite snacks were on the table. Even when she really got forgetful and didn’t talk much anymore and many times didn’t even know who my grandpa was, he would prepare the afternoon tea every day. One day, while he was pouring the tea into their cups, I heard him say, ‘Thank you my love for all the years you made tea. You are the best companion anyone could ever have, and for that I am so grateful.’ And then he kissed her cheek. That’s what I think love is.” – Sarah

    The teacher asked Sara if she could read her paragraph to the class. The image of caring, gentleness, and gratitude so beautifully captured by the grandpa’s words and actions could potentially contribute to the developing personal schema of virtue in each of those children who listened to Sara’s paragraph about what she thinks love is.

    A Story About Gratitude & Journaling

    A mother and her daughter were reminiscing about the many happy memories they had. They reviewed family stories and events that they had talked about many times before but always the joy remained each time they reminisced. Then the mother said, “There’s one story I think I never told you. When your father and I first married, he was a good husband, a good provider, and very responsible. But he rarely smiled and always seemed to be in such a rush that sometimes I felt like he didn’t even notice me and thought that maybe he wasn’t happy being married to me. Then one day he came to breakfast, sat down, and gave me the biggest smile you can imagine. And he didn’t seem so rushed as he usually was, and after breakfast he thanked me. I was stunned. And every morning after that it was the same — a smile and a thank you at breakfast and that started my day in such a beautiful, positive way. But I never knew what caused him to change his behavior. Back then I was afraid to ask, like maybe he would revert back to his former ways. Then on the last day before he died I asked him. He told me that he had seen a news story about people in a town hit by a tornado, who had lost everything — homes, cars, businesses, anything that could be picked up or knocked down, destroyed by the powerful winds. He said he realized that providing a roof over our heads was not enough as the roof itself could be gone in a split second. And he started thinking about things that could not be destroyed by a wind or other force of nature, or by the common ups and downs of life.

    His smile and thank you that first morning, he told me, was the beginning of an inner journey that lasted for the rest of his life. His expressions of gratitude each morning — a smile and a thank you — were a demonstration of his love, a gift to me, a beautiful demonstration of how much he cared. And he vowed those many years ago to live his life giving gifts that can’t be destroyed in the physical world. He would give gifts that come from the soul and endure forever. And he told me that he felt so grateful for the greater insight and understanding of what is truly valuable in this life that he started a journal to record all the things he was grateful for, all his thoughts and experiences and analyses and researches about gratitude. He included stories, quotes, anything he could find related to gratitude as that had become a life theme for him. And the journal, he told me, served as great reminder and motivator for him.

    What he said was so profound and poetic. We cried and laughed together that last day in the hospital and that night he passed away. And truly, that night with all my grief and sadness that he was gone, I smiled. And I thanked God for the many years of happiness I spent with your father and that first smile and thank you at breakfast so long ago — for it was the beginning of our deep and abiding love for each other. And that I shall always carry in my heart. And he gave me that day, before his passing, his gratitude journal.Actually, let me go get it right now…I want to share it with you because it’s so beautiful.” Her daughter smiled, tears of joy and appreciation in her eyes,as she felt truly blessed.

    The Far Reach of Gratitude

    As related throughout this article, being grateful is associated with the following:

    Increased blessings and bounties from God; protection from punishment for sin; a shield against arrogance, vanity, and self-glory; more positive emotions and life satisfaction; a general feeling of contentment with one’s life; greater energy; increased optimism; lower levels of depression or stress; ability to put difficult or negative things in a healthy perspective and focus on the positive; being more empathic and having the ability to see and understand others’ perspectives; feeling an interconnectedness with life and other people and having a sense of responsibility about others’ welfare; being less materialistic; feeling less envy; lower aggression; taking better care of oneself physically and mentally; eating a healthier diet; coping better with stress; a stronger immune system; ability to generate regular and healthy heart rhythm; being more generous; experiencing improved relationships.

    This long list throws interesting light on the verse that tells us if we are grateful, Allah SWT will grant us “increase.” This could be understand as an increase in gratitude itself; or a general “increase” of bounties and blessings. Certainly the list of so many positive and salutary effects from practicing gratitude is nothing short of a stunning and exquisite “increase” in good. Thus, we should feel awe and thankfulness for the bounty and miracle of life and the provision of guidance, seeking many moments of quiet reflection to contemplate what we perceive in the outer world and in our innermost beings. We will discover and give as gifts the many enduring treasures we collect as we “sail the ocean of these meanings,” “see their wonders,” and “dive into their depths.”

    Contentment & Gratitude: Hand-in-Hand

    One of those treasures that endure — contentment —that is to be cultivated: contentment in being who we are, giving up envy of others for what they have and we don’t. The Prophet, peace be upon him, said, “Consider well contentment, for it is a treasure without end” (Al-Tabarani). Contentment means that our appreciation of beauty, love, talent, knowledge and wisdom, achievements in the arts and sciences, justice, and wholesome things of the material world —anything good in this life — our appreciation does not depend upon us possessing or experiencing those things first hand; and conversely, it too often happens that the more a person possesses, the less he appreciates what he has. Ibn Hazm points out this wisdom: “I would rather be able to appreciate things I cannot have than to have things I am not able to appreciate.”

    Contentment and gratitude go hand-in-hand.There is a fable about a peacock which complained to God that the nightingale has a sweet song and he did not. God replied to the peacock that he had a most beautiful tail. The peacock asked what good was this beauty without a voice to sing like the nightingale. God replied that every creature has its unique gifts and each should be content with who they are and grateful for what they have been given.

    We human beings do not have a beautiful tail like the peacock or as exquisite a song as the nightingale. What we do have is hearing and sight and intelligence and affection, all of which can lead us to a deep and heartfelt expression of contentment with, and gratitude for, the good in our lives; however it comes to us — in gain or loss, suffering or joy. Alhamdulillah.

    “If you are thankful, I will grant you increase” (Qur’an14:7).

  • The Spiritually Alive Parent or Teacher

    The Spiritually Alive Parent or Teacher

    On the website incultureparent.com, London-based writer Umm Salihah described the authoritarian upbringing she experienced:

    “My parents and grandparents grew up in Pakistan where it was the norm to be smacked by your parents, extended relations and anyone else that happened to be around and in a bad mood. It was also okay to be given a smack ’round the head for doing something you shouldn’t have, for watching someone else doing it, maybe for not stopping them or maybe again because someone was in a bad mood…

    “There is also the traditional South Asian thinking that a good child is an obedient child, smacked and yelled into submission by a parent who knows best. How do you tell such parents about feeling left out because you dress different, weighing up the way you feel about clothes, boys, life in general as a teenager with the need to please your parents and be a good Muslim? Who do you talk to about peer pressure, bullying or all the other things that confuse kids?”

    The Prophet (pbuh) was the most responsive to the people, exhibiting flexibility and willingness to make adjustments and accommodations according to the conditions and needs of people individually and/or collectively

    Umm Salihah states that it is not her intention to denigrate those parents who approach parenting the way their own parents did. Her intention is to reflect and reconsider our approach to parenting, and so she asks: “What we have to examine is whether the new generation of parents who are disinclined to smack their children are leaving a vacuum with respect to managing the behavior of children. If we don’t smack, how do we get our children to listen to and respect us? Have we gone from physically abusing our children to setting no parental boundaries for them at all?”

    The rest of her article details an Islamic approach to parenting that eschews both “physically abusing our children” and “setting no parental boundaries for them at all.” What she then describes is authoritative parenting, in between authoritarian and permissive.

    Permissive and Authoritative Styles

    Authoritarian parenting involves the following elements:

    • Parents’ role comes across to the children as despotic (absolute and dictatorial power over the child)
    • Strict rules and expectations which tend to be rigid and inflexible
    • Children are expected to be unconditionally obedient and unquestioning of parental demands
    • Parents feel it is their right to be respected by the child regardless of their own behavior; little or no consideration is given to the right of the child to be respected by the parent
    • High expectations are placed on children with regard to their performance academically and in reaching any other goals set in place by parents
    • Little expression of warmth or nurturing
    • Punishments are meted out with little or no explanation and with the aim of making the child “pay” for his/her mistake or non-compliance; punishments can be harsh, unrelated to the infraction, and inconsistent
    • Children are not given choices or options; complete control is exercised over the child

    Permissive parenting involves the following elements:

    • Parent(s) often seem more like a friend than a parent
    • Few rules or standards of behavior are put in place and when there are rules, they are often very inconsistent
    • Bribery such as toys, gifts, and food are used as a means to get child to behave
    • Abundant love and nurturing of the children is expressed
    • Few expectations are placed on children with regard to academic performance or other goals

    Authoritarian and permissive parenting styles are seen as being opposite extremes. In between the two is the authoritative parenting style. Authoritative parenting involves the following elements:

    • Parent comes across to the children as role model, teacher, and guide
    • Rules are established and limits are put in place; expectations about children’s behavior and goals are expressed and discussed; flexibility and willingness to make adjustments are utilized as needed or appropriate
    • Children are expected to be obedient but parent(s) are willing to listen to the children and allow their expression of opinion as a way to encourage good communication skills, independence, responsibility, and self-direction
    • Parents feel it is their right to be respected by the child but also believe that the respect must be deserved based on their own proper and fair behavior toward the child; commensurate consideration is given to the right of the child to be respected by the parent(s)
    • High expectations are placed on children with regard to their performance academically and in reaching any other goals set in place by parents and children collaboratively
    • Warmth, caring, and nurturance are freely and frequently expressed
    • Consequences are used as a means to teach greater self-discipline and responsibility rather than as a rote punishment of the child; parents administer fair and consistent discipline and are willing to explain the natural connection between the infraction and the consequence
    • Children are encouraged to discuss options, make choices, and develop the capacity for decision-making and self-regulation in daily living

    We can gain further insight into the difference between authoritarian and authoritative approaches by looking at teaching styles. According to PENT (Positive Environments, Network of Trainers) of the California Department of Education, the authoritarian teacher “places firm limits and controls on the students “and they know that they “…should not interrupt the teacher. Since verbal exchange and discussion are discouraged, the authoritarian’s students do not have the opportunity to learn and/or practice communication skills. This teacher prefers vigorous discipline and expects swift obedience. Failure to obey the teacher usually results in detention or a trip to the principal’s office. In this classroom, students need to follow directions and not ask why. At the extreme, the authoritarian teacher gives no indication that heshe cares for the students.”

    Parents and teachers are challenged to help children/students understand that the deen is not simply a set of rules that one applies in his/her life, but rather a path that one embarks on, using the rules as compass and map along the way

    As to the authoritative style of teaching, PENT says, “The authoritative teacher places limits and controls on the students but simultaneously encourages independence. This teacher often explains the reasons behind the rules and decisions. If a student is disruptive, the teacher offers a polite, but firm, reprimand. This teacher sometimes metes out discipline, but only after careful consideration of the circumstances. The authoritative teacher is also open to considerable verbal interaction, including critical debates. The students know that they can interrupt the teacher if they have a relevant question or comment. This environment offers the students the opportunity to learn and practice communication skills.” This type of teacher “exhibits a warm and nurturing attitude toward the students and expresses genuine interest and affection. Her classroom abounds with praise and encouragement.”

    Responsiveness to Children

    While both authoritarian and authoritative parenting place high expectations on children regarding their behavior and their attaining of goals, a critical difference between the two styles is the element of responsiveness. Authoritarian parents and teachers put greater emphasis on themselves, their perceived role and authority, their right to be in charge and in control. Authoritative parents and teachers put greater emphasis on the children, and are highly attuned to and responsive to their needs.

    We must devote our energies to teaching children and modeling for them a lifelong devotion of growth and self-development

    The dictionary defines “responsive” as “responding especially readily and sympathetically to appeals, efforts, influences, etc.” To be responsive is to care, to have compassion and empathy, to attend to people according to their needs. It is to be receptive, understanding, and sympathetic. Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, was the best example of this. In an article “The Prophet Muhammad — Gentle, Caring and Loving” by Professor Tariq Ramadan, the author says, “In his daily life, while he was preoccupied by attacks, treachery and his enemies’ thirst for revenge, he remained mindful of the details of life and of the expectations of those around him…” Ramadan points out that the Prophet spent much time in prayer and worship but was quick to advise his companions that while he himself adhered to a rigorous spiritual regimen, this was not demanded of believers, that in fact Allah SWT wanted to ease their burdens and that Islam is a way of life given to moderation. Ramadan supports this by citing the time the Prophet (pbuh) said, “Woe to those who exaggerate [who are too strict]!” (Bukhari). The Prophet repeated this three times. He (pbuh) also said: “Moderation, moderation! For only with moderation will you succeed” (Muslim).

    Prof. Ramadan also mentions the time a companion asked about being rewarded for having lawful intercourse. And the Prophet (pbuh) answered him, “Tell me, if one of you had had illicit intercourse, would he not have committed a sin?” Ramadan comments, “He thus invited them to deny or despise nothing in their humanity and taught them that the core of the matter was achieving self-control.” Ramadan also cites the hadith, “If you hear about your brother something of which you disapprove, seek from one to seventy excuses for him. If you cannot find any, convince yourselves that it is an excuse you do not know” (Al-Bayhaqi).

    Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) said: “Make [things] easy, not difficult…” (Saheeh Al-Bukhari) He (pbuh) was the greatest exemplar of facilitating the way for people to submit to Allah SWT of their own volition, according to their individual capacities, state of development both in character and in spiritual understanding. It is reported that “A Bedouin once urinated in the masjid (mosque.) The people rushed to punish him, but the Prophet ordered them to ‘leave him alone until he finishes and then pour a bucket of water (over the place where he had urinated.)’ ‘Your mission is to make things easy and not to make them difficult.’ Then the Prophet called the man over and explained to him that the masjid is a pure place, a place of worship, and that urination there is inappropriate.” (Saheeh Al-Bukhari)

    So while the Prophet (pbuh) demonstrated through his example the divine principles and guidelines as foundation for a disciplined and orderly life, he was also the most responsive to the people, exhibiting flexibility and willingness to make adjustments and accommodations according to the conditions and needs of people individually and/or collectively. He was the greatest listener and made each and every person feel dignified and respected in his interaction with him or her. His teachings encouraged independence, responsibility, and self-direction. He freely expressed his caring and concern for the people and encouraged the believers to express their love for one another. The Prophet (pbuh) was a guide, guardian, mentor, motivator, and an inspirer of the people. He was not a despot.

    Being a Guardian, Mentor and Motivator

    As parents and teachers, we should bring a depth of conviction and inspiration to our raising and teaching of the children. And we will do that if we live according to the principle that “Each day a man is a vendor of his soul – either freeing it or bringing it to ruin” (Muslim).The parent or teacher has to convey that choosing to embark on the journey, the traveling of the path toward excellence and freedom of the soul, is the most profound and exciting manner of living, and that Islam is not just a set of rules to follow and a duty to discharge. The authoritative parent or teacher helps the child to internalize self-discipline and responsibility.

    A survey was done some years ago with the students at the weekend Islamic school in a local community in Pennsylvania. When asked what they liked most about attending the school, too many answered that the only good thing was eating pizza at lunchtime! Their answers on the survey revealed that none of them perceived or experienced the acquiring of Islamic knowledge through their attendance at the school as anything other than boring and monotonous, and they looked at it as being imposed upon them by their parents as a duty.

    It’s sad because the only way they could experience it that way is if the teachers experienced it that way! If the teachers had experienced the seeking of knowledge as Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali described the understanding of Qur’anic verses — as a diving “into their depths so that you might obtain their jewels…” — if adults experience the seeking of knowledge as a path toward understanding and insight, a quest for self-transformation, an obtaining of precious gems of wisdom, as something exciting, enriching, and joyful, that is how it would come across to the students. Some of you may be saying to yourselves – “oh come on… who said we have to be stimulating, enriching and joyful in how we teach our kids.” If you think that is has to be all duty and seriousness, then what do you say about the following hadeeth:

    “If you pass by the garden of paradise, indulge freely. The companions asked him ‘what is the garden of paradise?’ He answered, ‘the halaqa’”(Al –Tirmidhi). Paradise is not dull, formalistic, and routine. It is joyful, rich, and exciting and that is what a halaqa (study circle) is being compared to. And in another hadeeth we are told, “Indeed Allah SWT created angels who travel throughout the land, and if they see any study circles they call one another, ‘come to what you have been looking for’” (Bukhari, Muslim and Al-Tirmidhi). In Arabic, the phrase “what you have been looking for” connotes something, that when you find it, you are very happy and excited. So not only are those human beings who are gathered in the halaqa having a joyful, rich, and exciting experience, also the angels come and experience that same happiness and excitement that is inherent in the seeking of knowledge.

    At the same Sunday school where the survey was done, one weekend the teacher of the eighth grade Islamic Studies class was sick and the principal was unable to find any of the usual substitutes available to teach that class. He finally called one sister who had never substituted before. When the students saw that they had a substitute, they expected that she would just babysit them or bore them just as their regular teacher did. But she shocked them, engaging them in a way that got them curious and really involved in the topics they covered. The irony is that the mother of one of the students had decided to stay and help out in the class that day. She was a certified teacher in the public schools. After the class she approached this sister and asked her, “where did you learn to teach that way – it was amazing. The kids were not only attentive, they actually appeared excited to participate and were competing to answer questions and get involved.” The substitute teacher told her that she had no training. She thought for a moment and then said, “I’m sure the reason the kids were excited is that they could feel my own love and excitement about learning and wonder and reflection.”

    Being curious about life and nature and the world, its meaning and purpose; being fascinated about how things work; figuring out how to increase one’s focus and concentration or how to improve one’s motivation to achieve goals; loving the etymology of words, their root meanings and subtle shades of connotation; asking questions which stimulate thought, spark the imagination, and fire up the yearning to know and understand —this is how the sister experienced the seeking of knowledge and reflecting upon what she learned…like she was gaining access to treasures. In fact, the Prophet (pbuh) said, “Knowledge contains treasures and their key is the question” (Al-Heliah by Abu Na’eem). Hunting for and finding treasures — that is what came across to the students in class that day, inspired to learn by a sister who had never formally taught before.

    Parents and teachers are challenged to help children/students understand that the deen is not simply a set of rules that one applies in his/her life, but rather a path that one embarks on, using the rules as compass and map along the way. It is a process of mind and heart, of observing and thinking deeply about the Signs of beauty and of order and proportion all around us; of reaching inward to the core of our humanness, and there in the center of our beings we can look at ourselves honestly…we can look at others compassionately. Through reflection we internalize the best of whatever we learn, embodying principles which guide and heal, inspire and empower.

    To reiterate, the teacher has to convey that the journey, the traveling of the path toward excellence and freedom of the soul, is the most profound and exciting manner of living — indeed a way of life that brings fulfillment and reward in this life and in the hereafter.

    Disciplining Children Without Intimidation

    First it is important to mention is that there must be a foundation of organization and structure, whether in the home or in school, in order for children to feel secure and relaxed, open to learning and open to correction when necessary.

    Studies have found that children thrive in an environment that is organized. One of the most compelling changes made in a household that is “out of control” is the instituting of a daily schedule that all family members follow when at home, caregiver(s) and children alike. When young children know exactly what to expect every day, when play time is, when snacks are enjoyed, when nap time comes, when they are expected to help with chores, this organized schedule immediately puts them at ease. Children, who are whiny, bored, prone to tantrums and misbehavior, suddenly perk up with more positive attitude and behavior, and often look like completely different children. Of course it can take some time to institute this schedule and make it routine, and consistency is essential on the part of the care-giving parent(s); as are other fundamental aspects of good parenting as shown in studies: consistent calm assertiveness on the part of the parents as team leaders, complete respect between parents and children and between spouses, and the family seeing itself as a team, following the same rules, and cooperating for the good of the individuals and the whole, and the facilitation of social harmony in their family unit.

    This also applies to the school setting. Teacher must, like parents, create an environment in which the children not only can learn academically, but also can learn behaviors that will serve them well throughout life. When parents/teachers are consistent in applying the rules of the home or the classroom, children tend to respond. If the caregiver is inconsistent, either because rules have not been established or because the caregiver himself/herself is undisciplined or disorganized, how can we expect children to be disciplined and organized?

    The second important thing to keep in mind is that in most instances it helps to stop thinking in terms of punishment altogether and think in terms of learning opportunities. Is not childhood a time for the young human being to learn the rules of life including how to speak and how to behave with good manners, how to interact with others, how to share, how to resolve conflicts, and so on? Humans are not born with these competencies and have to learn them. We should look with excitement at the opportunity to teach our children the joy of self-governance and mastering their desires and impulses. At the same time we want to ensure that their youthful optimism and happiness and self-esteem remain intact. Studies have shown that children who are punished rather than corrected and guided to improve themselves are more susceptible to anger and depression. “That’s because authoritarian child raising makes it clear to kids that part of them is not acceptable, and that parents aren’t there to help them learn to cope and manage those difficult feelings that drive them to act out. They’re left lonely, trying to sort out for themselves how to overcome their ‘lesser’ impulses,” says clinical psychologist Dr. Laura Markham.

    It is important to point out that when a parent or teacher gets easily frustrated or angry at a child, they are forgetting what their relationship with the child is all about. If we want the child to grow and develop their capabilities in a healthy and successful way, then we have to devote our energies to teaching them and modeling for them what a lifelong devotion to growth and self-development looks like. That devotion includes cultivating traits that support growth such as integrity, patience, tolerance, and empathic understanding.

    The Islamic teachings with regard to disciplining/teaching children make it clear that physical punishment such as hitting or spanking is not the preferred choice. Indeed, there are quite a few qualifications about physically disciplining a child. If you really ponder the following points, it becomes clear that most instances of using this method are ruled out. Consider the following:

    • we have to make sure that we are a good model for the child first and foremost
    • we must warn the child verbally before resorting to physical punishment
    • we are not to deliver a punishment such as spanking if angry; Prophet Muhammad even advised judges not to judge if they are upset or angry
    • the physical punishment cannot be carried out as a way for the adult to vent frustration or to retaliate against the child
    • Khalif Umar RAA advised that parents shall not raise the arm higher than the point where the armpit would become visible to another person; also the arm should not be taken away from the body (meaning that there should be no force in the spanking)
    • the face, head, or any sensitive place on the body shall not be touched
    • if child asks you to stop, you need to stop, especially if he/she mentions the name of Allah SWT (such as the child uttering “I ask you in the name of Allah to stop”) and dialogue with him or her.

    According to the contemporary scholar, Muhammad Ibn Ismail, “Hitting is very limited to very few children’s types of personalities. But it is better that it should not be used at all. The practical sunnah of the Prophet (pbuh) is that he never hit anybody even though it was allowed.” He further states that “The majority of scholars have agreed that hitting should be eliminated and (verbal) warnings are sufficient.

    The third important point concerns how we can most effectively teach our children to behave well and what to do when they misbehave despite our efforts. It makes perfect sense to use the method of applying natural and logical consequences as a way of teaching children and correcting their mistakes. Using this method of disciplining and teaching children involves making the child feel that he/she is sharing control and involved in decision-making, allowing the natural consequences for the child’s behavior to do the teaching while making sure that the parent/teacher deals empathically with the child, and finding every available opportunity to enhance the self-concept and self-esteem of the child.

    Just as children respond so positively to structure and organization, they respond likewise to limits being set by the adult and knowing exactly what the limits are and that there are consistent consequences when the limits are breached. It is important to stress again and again that setting and enforcing limits must be done in a calm, caring way. It’s been said, “Notice something you don’t like about your child, show some emotion, and the problem is guaranteed to get worse.” Showing anger, frustration, or any out-of-control behavior by the caregiver will not bring about the desired results. The caregiver is modeling the best behavior, and thus is to avoid over-reacting, showing hostility, provoking, threatening, lecturing, or in any way antagonizing the child.

    Using this method ensures that during and after the discipline, the child feels respected and cared for. It is conveyed to the child, even when he/she is too young to understand in a conceptual or cognizant way, that their misbehaviors and their mistakes are opportunities to learn and find a better way to operate in daily life. Thus children get a good sense, even at an early age, that they can be responsible, confident, and capable of positive and happy interactions with other children, with adults, and in the world at large.

    Being sincerely empathic and understanding with the child throughout the process of discipline, allows the child to focus on the mistake or misbehavior, rather than him/her becoming defensive or resentful toward the parent or teacher. By conveying a calm, empathic, and caring attitude, we are allowing the child to grow in integrity and to avoid the self-denials and self-deceptions that are acquired by those children who feel threatened, abused, or misunderstood and therefore need to defend themselves.

    Offering choices to the child whenever possible builds that shared sense of power and decision-making. Examples are “Would you like to spend the half hour before bedtime reading a book with me or doing a puzzle?” In the classroom, a teacher could say to a child who is talking out of turn, “You can choose to come sit in the chair by me or remain in your own seat quietly and paying attention.” When giving a child or a student two choices, make sure that both choices are acceptable to you and that both are workable or enforceable. If the child does not choose within 30 seconds, the parent/teacher chooses. Children quickly realize that they benefit from paying attention when the choices are given or they lose the opportunity and the adult does the choosing.

    It is always preferable to use statements that, again, convey a calm assertive caring authority, and are stated in a positive rather than a negative way. Thus it is better to say, “You may come outside to play with us as soon as you complete your work” rather than, “Do your work or you can’t go outside!” Another example is, “We will proceed to the cafeteria when everyone is quiet and lined up” rather than, “We will stand here and we will not move until everyone quiets down!”

    Using natural and logical consequences in a calm and empathic way lets the child know that you are not angry at them and this allows them to really think about their behavior, about their choices at hand, and about the consequences for misbehavior or mistakes. For example, if your child failed to do homework, you can say, “I’m really sorry that you have to go to school tomorrow unprepared. And I’m sad that you will miss your computer time tonight.” Another example could be if the child refuses to eat dinner when the family sits down to eat. The parent can say, “You may leave the table but I am sad that you will go to bed hungry tonight.” It is extremely important to enforce that statement and follow through with the consequence even though you feel terrible that your child goes to bed hungry; but you can be sure that he/she will not repeat that mistake again.

    In fact, natural, logical, and fair consequences have been decreed by Allah SWT for human beings on this earth. These consequences are an integral part of the laws of cause and effect. In this dunya human beings sin, make mistakes, select less than optimal choices — all for us to learn, repent, grow, and increase our self-knowledge and wisdom. It is by suffering the natural consequences here in this life so that we can purify our souls that we might gain positive consequences in the life to come.

    Authoritarian vs. Authoritative – The Final Touch

    Qin Shi Huang Di, first emperor of China who built the Great Wall, took the throne in 246 B.C. He had 700,000 laborers construct a mausoleum, a city-size burial place for him. Many cultures including the ancient Chinese believed that people and objects were needed by a ruler for the afterlife and should be entombed with him. In those cultures, valued advisors and others attending to the emperor, king, or pharaoh would sometimes be sacrificed at the time of his death so that they could be buried with him. Qin apparently felt he needed his army to protect his tomb and accompany him to the afterlife, but that would be quite impractical. So he had thousands of life-size terra cotta soldiers carved, each with unique facial features, swords and other weapons. The terra cotta soldiers, not all of which have been excavated but are estimated to number as much as 8,000, are lined up in straight rows in underground trenches surrounding the tomb (to see a photo of this amazing archeological site, Google “terra-cotta army protects first emperor’s tomb”).

    The Qur’an says, “The blind and the seeing are not alike; nor are the depths of darkness and the light; nor are the shade and the heat of the sun. Nor are alike those who are living and those who are dead. Allah can make any that He wills to hear; but you cannot make those to hear who are in graves” (Qur’an 35:19-22). Ibn Al Qayyim explains that those who “are in graves” are those who are spiritually dead. They are, in fact, like “walking graves.” That is the authoritarian — spiritually dead, a “walking grave.”

    Just as Qin had his terra cotta soldiers all lined up around his tomb, the authoritarian is like a person who is slowly dying (a “walking grave”) and lines up subordinates to submit to and obey him, to imitate and parrot him. This is a formalistic, solemn, rigid manner of interaction that demonstrates that the authoritarian never embarked on the earthly journey to “free his [own] soul.” Thus, he has little to nothing of spiritual vigor, passion, and caring within him. The authoritarian parent or teacher might as well have terra cotta children or students, inert, lined up in straight rows without mobility, autonomy, or challenge to the authoritarian.

    On the other hand, the parent or teacher who is emulating the way of the Prophet (pbuh), strives for spiritual aliveness. Ahmad bin Hanbal cites in his book, Al-Zuhd, the words of Luqman the sage, advising his son, “O my son, accompany the learned ones…indeed, Allah SWT revives hearts by the light of wisdom as He revives the ground by rain.” Reviving hearts, his own first and then others — in diametric opposition to the authoritarian who is like a “walking grave” and surrounded by inert clay subordinates — is the yearning and aspiration of the spiritually alive individual. He or she strives to follow in the footsteps of the incomparable learned one, he who speaks and guides and teaches with the greatest authoritativeness: Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him.

    Professor Ramadan ends his article, “The Prophet Muhammad — Gentle, Caring and Loving,” with the following hadeeth reported by Abu Dawud and an-Nasa’i: “He once took young Mu’adh ibn Jabal by the hand and whispered: ‘O Mu’adh, by God, I love you. And I advise you, O Mu’adh, never to forget to say after each ritual prayer: O God, help me remember You, thank You and perfect my worship of You.’ Thus the young man was offered, in one outburst, both love and spiritual teaching, and the teaching was all the more deeply assimilated as it was wrapped in that love.”

    “It is part of the mercy of Allah that you deal gently with them. Had you been severe or harsh-hearted, they would have broken away from you. So pass over [their faults] and ask for forgiveness for them; and consult them in affairs. Then, when you have taken a decision, put your trust in Allah. For Allah loves those who put their trust [in Him]” (Qur’an 3:159).

  • Narratives, Interfaith Dialogue, and Transformation

    Narratives, Interfaith Dialogue, and Transformation

    Narratives are important. They are central to how we understand ourselves and betoken not just the chronology but also the meaning of our lives. Narratives are the stories we tell ourselves and others about who we are, what our experiences have been, and what we project, both positive and negative on the future. Narratives help us make sense of the world.

    There is healing in sharing our story with someone willing to “walk a mile in our shoes.”

    There are personal narratives and those of tribes, faith communities, cultures, and nations. Narratives are very powerful in their effect on individuals and groups. A personal narrative that says “Oh, poor me, nothing ever goes right… everything is stacked against me. What’s the use of trying anything since I’m just going to fail in the end” —this narrative, when believed with one’s heart and soul, vigorously demotivates this person and he is likely to fail at everything he tries as his narrative is self-sabotaging. Conversely, taking a group narrative as an example, one that says “My country is the greatest in the world, we are the most moral and generous people, always looking to advance the cause of freedom, social justice, and democracy”— this narrative, when believed with one’s heart and soul, motivates this person to be zealously patriotic and nationalistic. This is a narrative of self and national aggrandizement.

    It should be no surprise to us that narratives are an odd mix of reality and bunk, ranging from pure propaganda to something of deception (of self and others) to truth-telling. Every culture throughout history has plied its way forward through storytelling, using narratives to not only preserve its traditions, but also to educate or entertain. Cultural narratives endure because a multitude finds some sense or solace or inspiration in the message. And they act as audience again and again to the messages.

    Interfaith dialogue can help one to understand the viewpoints of others, even those who had been seen as enemies.

    Personal narratives also require audience. We all need people in our lives that are willing to listen to us, to try to understand our experience, what we are going through, our suffering, loss, triumph, or hope. But there is no guarantee that people will listen to our story when we need a sympathetic ear. Like the father in Anton Chekhov’s short story, Misery, we may find no one who will take the time to share our burden. The father is a Russian sleigh-driver and wants desperately to share his grief over his son’s death in the past week. He tries to no avail to share his despair with his passengers, one after another. The father “cannot think about his son when he is alone…. To talk about him with someone is possible, but to think of him and picture him is insufferable anguish….” Finally, he finds his only comfort in telling his trusty horse about his misery.

    Healing Through Narratives

    Indeed, there is healing in sharing our story with someone willing to “walk a mile in our shoes.” Drs. Les and Leslie Parrott wrote a book called Trading Places. They affirm that “When you accurately see any situation from another’s point of view, when you can experience it like they do, you instantly take a different approach to it.” Mahatma Gandhi said, “Three quarters of the miseries and misunderstandings in the world would finish, if people were to put on the shoes of their adversaries and understood their points of view.”

    Consider the following, modified from a true story related by a faith-based group in St. Louis:

    One winter day a group of people were meeting at a local community center. They were citizens who were concerned about the growing number of homeless individuals in their city and they were meeting in an impoverished part of town, discussing various ideas about how they could effectively help those in need and how they could counteract the government policies that were cutting into the safety net for the poor. All of sudden the door of the meeting room opened and a old woman, bent with fatigue and wearing ragged clothing, stood there awkwardly and clearly embarrassed. The meeting leader asked, “May I help you?” The woman apologized for interrupting them and then said, “I wonder if you can tell me where the nearest Salvation Army center is.” The meeting leader asked, “Are you looking for a meal?” The woman answered, “No, I need to get a pair of shoes.” The meeting leader had already noticed that the woman’s shoes were full of holes and falling apart. She asked the woman, “What size do you wear?” “Eight and a half,” answered the woman. The leader bent down and took off one of her shoes and said, “Please sit here and try this on.” The needy woman said, “Oh, I couldn’t do that, those are brand new shoes.” The leader gently encouraged her to try them on and the woman slipped on the shoes and a slightly sheepish smile appeared on her face as she quietly said, almost in a whisper, “They’re so nice and warm.” The leader touched her arm and said, “Please consider them yours. I’ve got another pair at home.” The poor woman thanked her and as she left she said, “God bless all of you.”

    After the homeless woman left, everyone was quiet, touched by what they had witnessed. One man in the group said, “But how will you go home? It’s snowing and cold and you don’t have any shoes.” The generous woman said, “My socks are thick…and I do have a pair of shoes…” as she put the homeless woman’s worn and torn shoes on her feet. As the group were leaving, one person said, “Be careful that you don’t step into icy puddles with those shoes on. They’re full of holes.” The woman answered with a smile, “I’ll be careful…now I’ll really know what it’s like to walk in the shoes of a poor, hurting human being. I just wish that our government officials could walk in these shoes on a cold, wet, snowy night!”

    Narratives in Interfaith Dialogue

    Narratives, as we can see, are also ways to instruct, to make a moral point. Sometimes through narrative we can persuade another to see things differently, to change their perspective about an issue or just to consider elements that escaped their notice previously. One of the most favorable venues for personal narratives is interfaith dialogue. Those who participate have the opportunity to share what brought them to the group, what memories or experiences predisposed them to want to reach out and find common ground with persons from other faith communities. Some individuals, whether Christian, Jewish, or Muslim, think that interfaith dialogue requires one to dilute their religious precepts; or that the participants are looking to develop some syncretistic faith, a kind of merging of the various faith traditions into one universalist religion. But most participants in interfaith dialogue will tell you that is not at all the case. Each comes to the experience with conviction about his or her belief system and religious tradition. Most will say they are not looking to convert and do not expect to be converted to some other faith tradition. They are looking to share, to build understanding, to develop structures and collaborative opportunities to fight for social justice and contribute to peacemaking in the world.

    Narratives Can Transform

    A most compelling example of such an experience is the case of Miko Peled. Peled comes from a very prominent Israeli family. His grandfather was amongst the founders of Israel, and his father was a renowned general in the Israeli army and directly involved in military decision-making, especially with regard to the Six Day War. How is it that Miko Peled, a Jewish man from a renowned Zionist family, came to the perspective that Israel was built on myth and double standard, that it is in no way a democracy, and that it is nothing short of an apartheid society, governed by a radical regime?

    In an interview he did in 2012 with Alex Becker of realchangenews.org, Peled shared how he came to understand the reality of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He says that after he served in the Israeli military, he travelled widely and then settled in San Diego to raise a family. In 1997 he got the news that his 13-year-old niece, Smadar, had been killed in a suicide bombing in Jerusalem. Peled’s sister, the mother of Smadar, blamed the policies of the Israeli government; she firmly believed that her daughter was “sacrificed for the Israeli government’s megalomania.” Peled says that this family tragedy and his sister’s dissident viewpoint “helped set me on the right path.” He found out about and started attending a Jewish-Palestinian dialogue group in Southern California. He points out in the interview that despite having grown up in Israel in such close proximity to Palestinians and with such egregious conflict raging in his own country throughout his lifetime, he did not meet a Palestinian until he was 39 years old. He says, “You know, there’s this image of Jerusalem, that it’s a united, multicultural city. It is multicultural, but it’s completely segregated. It’s a racist city, and there’s a lot of discrimination. So if you’re an Israeli boy growing up, you go to school, but you never meet Palestinians. You never see Palestinians. You know, they could be on the moon. If you do see them, they are in marketplaces or working as laborers. So the first time I really met Palestinians was in San Diego.”

    He relates that his transformation took place during his experience in attending this interfaith, intercultural group. Peled says, “…if you want dialogue to work, there’s a point you have to cross, the point where trust replaces fear. I had to replace my fear with trust. The Palestinians I spent time with in these groups were very nurturing and generous. The fear was not so much of the people: Really, the fear was learning the horrific truth. As I listened, I learned about what we did — not from a book or from a political statement or a speech, but from people just sitting like this and telling their story, not intending to convince anyone and not intending to accuse anyone. That’s the power of dialogue.”

    He learned from the Palestinians sitting across from him their perspective and their experience of the Nakba (the Catastophe) and its ongoing aftermath. In listening to their stories, hearing their narratives about how the Zionist forces “began a massive assault on the Palestinian towns and began a massive campaign of ethnic cleansing,” he says that he had a hard time coming to terms with this other side of the story: “It was absolutely horrific. I don’t know how to describe it. I wasn’t only proud of being an Israeli, I was proud of being an Israeli with pedigree. My grandfather’s name is on the Declaration of Independence, you know. It was pretty hard, and it took a long time to process.”

    But he did process it. He writes on his blog, http://mikopeled.com, “The State of Israel today is governed in a way that cannot be sustained, where the two nations it governs, Israelis and Palestinians are used and abused and it is a state of affairs that should not be tolerated…one nation ruling over another while controlling of the land and its resources. It is a reality where half of the population lives in what it thinks is a Western democracy while keeping the other half imprisoned by a ruthless defense apparatus that is becoming more violent by the day. In my book, The General’s Son, Journey of an Israeli in Palestine, I show how it is that the son of an Israeli General and a staunch Zionist came to these realizations. Realizing that your side of the story is not the only side to the story, and then accepting rather than fighting this realization and in the end finding that the story upon which I was raised, was a lie – now that is an interesting journey.” (For more of Peled’s story and viewpoints, go to YouTube and search Miko Peled 1 of 5 “The General’s Son.”)

    Interfaith dialogue, as Peled’s story shows, can help one to understand the viewpoints of others, even those who had been seen as enemies. We should take note that Peled says the Palestinians in the group were “very nurturing and generous”; here they were, sitting across from a man who belonged to the nation that occupied their land and relentlessly oppressed them and their families, yet they spoke “not intending to convince anyone and not intending to accuse anyone.” And so that man who had been of the enemy, now became a true friend and a supporter of Palestinian rights. As Peled said, “That’s the power of dialogue.”

    “And who could be better of speech than he who calls [his fellow-men] unto God, and does what is just and right, and says, ‘Verily, I am of those who have surrendered themselves to God?’ Nor can goodness and evil be equal. Repel [evil] with what is better — then he between whom you and him there was enmity will become as though he was a devoted friend!” (Qur’an 41:33-34).

     

    Further Objectives in Interfaith Dialogue

    In Dialogue in Islam: Qur’an, Sunnah, History, authors Ahmet Kurucan and Mustafa Kas?m Erol describe a number of other objectives, not as dramatic as the transformation that Peled underwent but nonetheless important, that can be achieved through interfaith dialogue:

    “Dialogue enriches our experience as human beings.

    Dialogue can enhance our understanding of ourselves because, by contextualizing ourselves among others who are different, we see our own beliefs, values and identities more clearly.

    [Through dialogue,] we see more clearly what is distinctive in our own identity, as well as learning to appreciate what is distinctive about others.

    [In dialogue] we challenge stereotypes, correct misconceptions and reduce prejudice. In turn we gain understanding of the beliefs and values of those others, which may correct mistakes in our perceptions of them.

    Dialogue can enable us to explore together solutions to all kinds of shared problems. Today we face global problems such as moral degeneration, environmental pollution, unfair distribution of economic gains, disease, poverty, collapse of family values, fanaticism in the name of race, religion and nationalism, and problems threatening world peace such as terrorism, war and exploitation.”

    The urgency for cooperation to solve the issues of our day is echoed by many. Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who chose the name “Francis” upon becoming Pope this year, has been known throughout his life for humility, dedication to helping the poor and marginalized, and being committed to dialogue as the means to bring people together to solve our human problems. He chose the name Francis after Francis of Assisi (who died in 1226) whose devotion “to make society more humane and more just” makes the name-choice fitting. The day following his inauguration, the Pope addressed representatives from Christian and non-Christian religions who had been invited to Rome. He first addressed the Muslims who, he said, “adore the one, living, and merciful God and who call upon Him in prayer.” Then, to all of those in the audience, he said, “I really appreciate your presence. In it I see a tangible sign of the desire to grow in mutual respect and cooperation for the common good of humanity.” On another occasion he said, “My wish is that the dialogue between us should help to build bridges connecting all people, in such a way that everyone can see in the other not an enemy, not a rival, but a brother or sister to be welcomed and embraced.”

    The press release of the 2009 book, The Saint and the Sultan: The Crusades, Islam, and Francis of Assisi’s Mission of Peace by Paul Moses, describes the meeting between St. Francis of Assisi and Malik al-Kamil, the Sultan of Egypt and nephew of Salah ad-Din: “In 1219, as the Fifth Crusade was being fought, Francis crossed enemy lines to gain an audience with Malik al-Kamil, the Sultan of Egypt. The two talked of war and peace and faith and when Francis returned home, he proposed that his Order of the Friars Minor live peaceably among the followers of Islam–a revolutionary call at a moment when Christendom pinned its hopes for converting Muslims on the battlefield.”

    In Franciscan Nonviolence: Stories, Reflections, Principles, Practices and Resources by Butigan, Litell, and Vitale, the authors write that the encounter between Francis of Assisi and the Sultan represents “the ability to listen respectfully, and to be willing to be changed by an aspect of truth expressed by another.” They write that Francis of Assisi and Sultan Malik al-Kamil demonstrated “a willingness to search together for aspects of truth found in different traditions.” In a piece on Huffington Post, author Omar Sacirbey writes, “Chris van Gorder, a scholar of Christian-Muslim relations at Baylor University, asserts that St. Francis, a former soldier, was driven by compassion, a hatred for war, a desire to learn from others, and ‘to build missionistic bridges of reconciliation and healing.’” According to Van Gorder, “St. Francis of Assisi was a confident evangelist and a fearless peacemaker who was appalled at the rapacious violence of his era.”

    The Need for Increasing Dialogue

    Today we are also living in an era of rapacious violence. And we are living in an era of increasing inter-religious dialogue. Adnan Husain, who teaches at Queen’s University in Canada and is the author of Identity Polemics: Encounters with Islam in the Medieval Mediterranean World (1150-1300), points out that such dialogues were commonplace in the Islamic world in the Middle Ages and public debates and discussions among Muslims, Jews, and Christians were evidence of a multi-religious society. While those debates and discussions were more intended to competitively demonstrate the truth of one’s own religion than to reach greater mutual understanding, they were noteworthy for their liveliness and passion. Rabbi Eric H. Yoffe warns of the tendency of interfaith groups today to be satisfied with “mouthing a few noble, often-repeated sentiments.” He says of these groups, “if we don’t dig beneath the surface and focus on substance rather than rhetoric, they mean very little.” Yet despite the flaws, he continues in his dedication to participating in interfaith dialogue because “very occasionally, something extraordinary happens: One of these conversations changes me, binds me to my colleagues, advances my understanding of myself and others, and adds texture and depth to my own religious beliefs and convictions.” While he acknowledges that he and other participants are too often “caught in the same old patterns and clichés that predominate in these settings,” those magical moments do transpire and make it all worthwhile: “Still, from time to time, we find a way to speak from the heart. When we do, God’s presence — variously felt and differently experienced — creates an atmosphere of faith, partnership and common purpose in the room. For those rare moments, I will continue to make the effort, without regrets.”

    Protest and Prayer

    Those magical moments happen when people speak from the heart, when they voice their spiritual passion and ethical commitment. What unites participants at an interfaith meeting is their devotion to God, their commitment to serve others and society, and their insistence that social justice must be wrought from the dedicated efforts of those who believe in truth and justice, whatever their religious persuasion. That passion is communicated in many ways. Abraham Joshua Heschel , a rabbi and civil rights activist, was a contemporary of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and there are photos of him walking arm-in-arm with King in the front row of marchers at Selma in 1965. He later wrote about his experience of that march, “For many of us the march from Selma to Montgomery was about protest and prayer. Legs are not lips and walking is not kneeling. And yet our legs uttered songs. Even without words, our march was worship. I felt my legs were praying.” That is the depth of passion that inspires others.

    Heschel has said that the religious individual is one ”… whose greatest passion is compassion, whose greatest strength is love and defiance of despair.” We indeed, must not despair at the complex array of challenges and issues that the world today faces. And we must be creative and resourceful in fighting for a just society. The power of people everywhere, decent, caring people who communicate and collaborate, form the foundation upon which to demand justice for all human beings. King wrote, “To accept passively an unjust system is to cooperate with that system.” He also said, “We must all learn to live together as brothers or we will all perish together as fools.”

    A Great World House

    In Where Do We Go From Here: Chaos or Community, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. astutely points out, “This is the great new problem of mankind. We have inherited a large house, a great world house in which we have to live together—black and white, Easterner and Westerner, Gentile and Jew, Catholic and Protestant, Moslem and Hindu — a family unduly separated in ideas, culture and interest, who, because we can never again live apart, must learn somehow to live with each other in peace.”

    Interfaith dialogue facilitates our living together in the “great world house,” in finding our common ground, in learning to speak our personal narratives from the heart so that others, possibly, might be touched and transformed. Dialogue also allows us to practice “listening respectfully, and to be willing to be changed by an aspect of truth expressed by another,” to put on the shoes of the “other” with volition and courage, even the shoes of our adversaries so that we might “understood their points of view” and then possibly, be transformed ourselves. Dialogue provides opportunity to “search together for aspects of truth found in different traditions.” All these are ways to “dig beneath the surface and focus on substance rather than rhetoric” so that we might together, in great and growing numbers, incline toward peace and “learn to live together as brothers [and sisters].” Because too many appear willing to “perish together as fools.”

    “O humankind, We created you from a male and female, and made you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another. In God’s eyes, the most honored of you are the ones most mindful of Him: God is All-Knowing, All-Aware” (Qur’an 49:13).

     

  • The Test of One Believer is a Test for All Believers

    The Test of One Believer is a Test for All Believers

    “And what is there to life if a man cannot hear the lonely cry of a whippoorwill or the arguments of the frogs around a pond at night. I am a red man and do not understand. The Indian prefers the soft sound of the wind darting over the face of the pond, and the smell of the wind itself, cleansed by a midday rain or scented with the pinyon pine. This we know — the earth does not belong to man but man belongs to the earth. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth befalls the sons and daughters of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life; he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”

    Man did not weave the web of life and death and suffering and relief. But he has capacity to act so as to increase the wellsprings of living in goodness, peace, and contentment; and to diminish the suffering

    These eloquent words are commonly attributed to Chief Seattle (an Anglicization of Si’ahl) in an 1854 speech to his tribe. He was chief of the Duwamish, the Native American Indian people of the western part of Washington State. It turns out that the words were actually penned in 1972 by screenwriter Ted Perry as a fictional account of Si’ahl’s speech, for a documentary about the environment. The words, nonetheless, describe the reciprocity with the natural world that man must respect and abide by. The native American Indians, like so many other cultures of the past, lived within parameters that sought not to exploit nature but to work with nature so that the give and take of sustainable existence is observed and fulfilled. As Francis Bacon, 17th century scientist said, “Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed.”

    That interconnectedness of all life upon the earth, “the web of life,” is remarkably mirrored in modern technologies of communication. That the internet is called the “worldwide web” is no misnaming. We are all wired into a global intelligence network, an information processing system that has been called the “global brain.” Some observers have likened webpages to neurons in the brain and hyperlinks to synapses. Is this modern phenomenon an outward sign of something fundamental to the human condition? Is this interconnectedness a defining quality of our humanity?

    Tawhid: The Integrating Principle

    For Muslims, the fundamental and integrating principle of belief is tawhid. The first meaning of this is the oneness of God, without partner, the single creator and ruler of the universe. What follows is a well-ordered and harmonious creation whose objects and phenomena derive from the one source, a divine maker and designer of not only the material world but also the physical and social laws that govern all existence and relationships, weaving created things together in a “web of life.” In this coherent schema of existence, the oneness of God imports the unity and brotherhood of humankind, and this is confirmed in the Qur’an: “Mankind was one single nation, and Allah sent Messengers with glad tidings and warnings…” (2:213), and “O humankind! We created you from a single (pair) of a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that you may know one another…” (49:13). Then the more intimate ties of family and marriage are ordained: “It is He Who has created man from water: then has He established relationships of lineage and marriage…” (25:54).

    Their test of hunger or thirst or calamity or abandonment or loss is our test — will we answer their need?

    The integrating principle of tawhid also holds important implications for economic policy and practice. Since we are all provided for by Allah SWT — “How many are the creatures that carry not their own sustenance? It is Allah who feeds them and you, for He hears and knows [all things]” (Qur’an 29:60) — the wealth that an individual acquires is his to use but is not to be hoarded or used in immoral or exploitive ways. And there are rights upon that wealth owed to orphans, widows, the hungry, and the underprivileged. All economic activity, industry, business transactions, production and distribution, buying and selling – all are undertaken within a moral context and with the underlying goal of maintaining, safeguarding, and promoting social justice and collective well-being.

    The society as a whole is ennobled by this social contract, one which demands that those who are disadvantaged and/or deprived of basic necessities be cared for by those who are able to provide. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) said, “The highest level of the intellect, after eman, is to be of service to the creation.” And this service is to be sincere, a natural expression of genuine faith: “Have you seen the one who denies the Judgment? That is he who pushes the orphan aside and does not promote feeding the poor. Woe, then, unto those who pray, but are neglectful of their prayers, those who would be seen [in worship] but refuse to share necessities of life with others” (Quran 107:1-7). Additionally, circumstance of misfortune can happen to any person at any time. When the hurricane rips through a town and homes are destroyed, when drought sears the crops and diminishes the food supply, when economies falter and unemployment soars – each person affected is tested by God. Will he maintain his faith, will she keep her hope alive, will they thank God for whatever bounties and mercies, however small, are granted?

    Being Tested in this Life

    Each person faces such tests in this life. And many, if not most, feel empathy that moves them to donate to relief causes after a humanitarian crisis in war-torn regions, or following an earthquake or other natural disaster, or to bring food supplies to areas afflicted by famine or water to drought victims. We feel empathy and remember that helping others is a virtue, enjoined upon us by Islamic teachings. Thus, we feel good about any contribution of money, time, or other resource to help others, to donate charitably to good causes, to support relief efforts. But we don’t often think in terms of this principle: The test of one believer is a test for all believers; and by extension, the test of one human being is a test for all human beings. But when we learn of some hardship a person, a family, or a community is suffering, sometimes the inner dialogue goes something like this: “Oh, those poor people, that is so horrible. O Allah, please help them, bring them relief, provide them with what they need to recover from this…and I’ll do my part and contribute…O thank God that wasn’t me!…my hardships are bad enough!…” Those private thoughts are natural to the human condition. But we need to remind ourselves again and again that humanity is interconnected; and even more thoroughly, the ummah is as integrally joined as interlaced fingers. The Prophet said, “A faithful believer to a faithful believer is like the bricks of a wall, enforcing each other.” While (saying that) the Prophet clasped his hands, by interlacing his fingers (Bukhari).

    The natural world offers us much food for thought and a trove of insights. Geese provide a good lesson in solidarity of purpose, in moving toward a common goal, sharing responsibility, motivating and encouraging one another, and taking care of those who stumble along the way. When migrating, these large waterbirds fly in a “V” formation and the flapping of wings by each bird creates an updraft for the bird behind it. The “V” formation adds roughly 70 percent greater flying range than if each bird flew on its own. When a goose falls out of formation, it suddenly feels the drag and quickly gets back into formation to take advantage of the lifting power of the bird in front. When the head goose gets fatigued, it moves back in the formation and another goose takes the lead. Geese honk from behind to encourage those up front to keep up their speed. When one goose gets sick or weak or wounded and falls out of the formation, two other geese follow that goose down to the ground and stay with the afflicted goose until it is able to fly again or until it dies; and only then do they return to the sky to try and catch up with their group. In “V” formation, the geese become almost like a macro-organism. This is a cooperative synergy where hazard experienced by one part brings immediate response from other parts.

    The Solidarity of the Ummah and One Human Family

    The ummah is no less a cooperative synergy. The Prophet, peace be upon him, said, “The believers, in their mutual love, mercy and compassion, are like one body: if one organ complained, the rest of the body develops a fever” (Bukhari and Muslim). The Prophet also said about fellowship: “None of you truly believes until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself” (Bukhari and Muslim). And further, “He who relieves a hardship of this dunya (earthly life) for a believer, Allah will relieve a hardship of the Day of Resurrection for him…” (Sahih Muslim).

    Being neighborly, kind, just — benevolent in every conceivable way — applies just as much to relations with all humanity. The Prophet said, “The person who gives some relief to a widow or the poor or the needy is like the one who makes efforts in the path of Allah.” The narrator then said, “I think the Prophet also said: ‘That person is like that person who is awake in the night [praying] and does not tire, or like the person who fasts continuously’” (Bukhari and Muslim). And in another hadith: “Allah is benevolent to that person who treats others with benevolence” (Sunan Abu Dawood).

    So when we see or know of someone who is suffering or enduring hardship, we recognize that he is being tested. “Be sure We shall test you with something of fear and hunger, some loss in goods, lives and the fruits [of your toil]; but give glad tidings to those who patiently persevere. Those who, when misfortune strikes them, say: ‘Indeed we belong to Allah and to Him is our return.’ Those are the ones upon whom are blessings and mercy from their Lord and it is those who are rightly guided” (Qur’an 2: 155). And then we remind ourselves that their suffering is a test for us as well. The Prophet peace be upon him, said:

    Verily, Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, would say on the Day of Resurrection: ‘O son of Adam, I was sick but you did not visit Me.’ He [the one being questioned on the Day of Judgment] would say: ‘O my Lord, how could I visit You as You are the Lord of the worlds?’ Thereupon He [SWT] would say: ‘Didn’t you know that such-and-such servant of Mine was sick but you did not visit him and were you not aware of this, that if you had visited him, you would have found Me by him?’ [The Lord would continue]: ‘O son of Adam, I asked food from you but you did not feed Me.’ He [the man] would say: ‘My Lord, how could I feed You as You are the Lord of the worlds?’ He [SWT]said: ‘Didn’t you know that such-and-such servant of Mine asked food from you but you did not feed him, and were you not aware that if you had fed him you would have found him by My side?’ [The Lord would continue]: ‘O son of Adam, I asked drink from you but you did not provide Me.’ He [the man] would say: ‘My Lord, how could I provide You as You are the Lord of the worlds?’ Thereupon He [SWT] would say: ‘Such-and-such servant of Mine asked you for a drink but you did not provide him, and had you provided him drink you would have found him near Me?’ (Muslim).

    The web of life that interconnects all human beings, and interfaces all life upon the planet in an ecological homeostasis, is a profound weave that encompasses everything from the microscopic material world to the realm of galaxies, billions of them (!) that comprise the universe. Then there is the ultimate connection — that of the created world to its Creator. We know from the following verse that Allah is not a remote Creator and Lord: “We verily created man and We know what his soul whispers to him, and We are nearer to him than his jugular vein” (Qur’an 50:16). And the Prophet, pbuh, said, “Be mindful of Allah, and you’ll find Him before you” (Tirmidhi and others). This nearness is expressed by Yahya ibn al-Mu’adh al-Razi, “He who knows himself, knows his Lord.” But we can also draw close to our Lord as stipulated in the above hadith. When we visit the sick, we will find Him by the ill person’s side. When we feed the hungry or provide drink to the thirsty; when we sponsor the orphan who cries alone at night; when we attend to the needs of the widow —we find Him by those who are suffering and in need of help. In fact, the imperative responsibility to respond to the needy is made clear by recognizing that in a very real sense it is Allah SWT Who is calling us, on their behalf, to provide the food, the drink, the comfort to the sick, the relief to the victims of disaster. Their test of hunger or thirst or calamity or abandonment or loss is our test — will we answer their need?

    Responsibility to Others

    The Native American view of life and man’s relation to it is represented by the words imputed fictionally to Chief Si’ahl: “All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons and daughters of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”

    Those are wise words that are consonant with Islamic teachings about man’s stewardship of the earth. And we can add something to it to express man’s responsibility to his fellow man: “All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. Whatever befalls one individual – impacts all others. Man did not weave the web of life and death and suffering and relief. But he has capacity to act so as to increase the wellsprings of living in goodness, peace, and contentment; and to diminish the suffering he finds before him as well as that which is out of view. Whatever he does to weave strands of benevolence into the web of life, he does to the betterment of his own soul and to the furtherance of well-being for all.

    Let it be said again and again: The test of one believer is a test for all believers. Integrate it into our souls so that on that Day of Sorting Out, the Lord will say that such-and-such servant of His asked, and we responded, and we did so with full awareness of our responsibility, and with yearning to partake of the light when we find the Lord by his side.

    According to Ibn Abbas, may Allah be pleased with him, Prophet David, God bless him and give him peace, said in his prayer, “My God, who inhabits Your House? And from whom do You accept the prayer?” Allah SWT answered him by inspiration, “David, he who inhabits My House and he whose prayer I accept is none but he who is humble before My Majesty, spends his days in remembrance of Me and keeps his passions in check for My sake; gives food to the hungry and shelter to the stranger, and treats the afflicted with compassion; his light shines like the sun in the sky…”

  • Happiness: Contentment, Optimism and Joy

    Happiness: Contentment, Optimism and Joy

    Life today is stressful and statistics clearly show that people are not coping well, with all the indices of unhappiness sky-high. As of 2010, 36 percent of Americans were obese, as noted in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. More than 21 percent of Americans take anti-depressants, according to a report by the National Center for Health Statistics, up by almost 400% between 1988–1994 and 2005–2008. According to a survey from the APA, 33 percent of American workers experience chronic stress related to work. And a study published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation found that “chronic stress plays a significant role in cancer progression.” Data shows that roughly 28 percent of American adults drink enough that they are at risk for dependence on or excessive use of alcohol. According to the American Journal of Public Heath, suicide is now the number one cause of “injury death” in the U.S.

    With an optimistic outlook, the believer also appreciates that adversity might in the long run benefit him (see 2:216) and believes during times of difficulty that relief will come (see 94:05).

    Don’t feel gloomy, though, because this article will argue that happiness is not a mood and it is not dependent on external circumstances. It is more a spiritual approach to life and a deliberate, chosen mindset that facilitates, feeds, and enhances the feeling of positive and enjoyable well-being moment to moment. Some may think “Well, who said we are meant to be happy in this life?” The Prophet pbuh said,”The most beloved of people to Allah is he who brings most benefit [to others], and the most beloved of deeds according to Allah SWT is that you bring happiness to a fellow Muslim …” (Al-Tabarani).

    We are meant to be happy! But that doesn’t mean that happiness is a constant state. Sadness, disappointment, loss, regret – these are all part of the human condition and provide the tests for each believer’s eman: “Do the people think that they will be left to say, ‘We believe,’ without being put to the test? We have tested those before them, for Allah will most certainly ascertain those who spoke the truth and those who lied” (Qur’an 29:2-3). Yet, there are those with a fundamental disposition of unhappiness, despondency, and gloominess. In contrast is the individual with a baseline of happiness, who responds with faith and resiliency to the tests, challenges, and traumas, and does not rely on fortunate circumstance to claim happy moments.

    If we are failing to live in the present moment, we are dwelling instead on the past or projecting ourselves into the future

    Studies show, according to the Mayo Clinic, that “Only 10 percent or so of the variation in people’s reports of happiness can be explained by differences in their circumstances. It appears that the bulk of what determines happiness is due to personality and — more importantly — thoughts and behaviors that can be changed.” That’s good news, because many people, like the malcontent, dwell on negative things, especially the adverse experiences that happened in their past. Psychology calls this “ruminating,” which in a straight dictionary sense means “thinking, or pondering, or mulling over.” A cow is one of the cud-chewing animals called a “ruminant,” which regurgitates its food from the stomach to the mouth to be chewed again — a fit description of a person who is “ruminating,” in the vernacular of psychology, i.e., running negative thoughts through the mind again and again, mentally regurgitating them to brood repeatedly on the emotional wounds, injustices, and resentments of the past.

    If we are failing to live in the present moment, we are dwelling instead on the past or projecting ourselves into the future. When projecting into the future, often this is a focus on fearing adversity that might happen and the anxiety that brings. Living in the present, however, keeping our awareness and focus on the moment that is now before us, is a steward of happiness. Through this focal point, there are countless opportunities to ferret out or create happiness, and this capacity surmounts the torments of life — the multifarious difficulties, sorrows, and worries. It’s like finding a space between the grief (of the past) and the anxiety (as to the future), a place that obtains, even if for just moments at a time, the feeling of equanimity. The Prophet pbuh recommended, as part of a longer hadith, that we make du’a saying, “O Allah, I seek refuge in you from anxiety and grief” (Abu Dawood).

    If we are seeking refuge in Allah SWT from the grief of the past and the anxiety associated with the future, then we are living principally in the present moment, in the sweet spot of equanimity, where happiness abides. A good case can be made that happiness consists of contentment, optimism, and joy — and that contentment pertains primarily to the past, optimism to the future, and joy to the present.

    Contentment (pertaining to the past)

    “…Truly, it is in the remembrance of Allah that hearts find contentment” (Qur’an 13:28). Remembrance of Allah SWT encompasses many things: believing in the Divine plan, putting one’s trust in God, abiding by His commands, and accepting with conviction and grace His decree in one’s own life. This includes graciously accepting one’s existing condition as it has unfolded from the past. Being content is being satisfied with whatever Allah SWT has provided, whether good fortune or bad, easefulness or difficulty, abundance or scarcity. “The happiness of the son of Adam depends on his being content with what Allah has decreed for him … and the misery of the son of Adam results from his discontent with what Allah has decreed for him” (Al-Tirmidhi). The perspective of a believer with regard to the decree of Allah SWT and whatever adversity and suffering is within that decree, is the following:

    • Human beings are tested while on this earth; it is how we respond to those tests which helps to make the heart pure and sound or, conversely, hardens the heart.
    • We seek the guidance of Allah SWT and believe Him when He says that if we follow His guidance, we will overcome grief and anxiety.
    • We strengthen our belief that in following Allah’s guidance we will ultimately attain to an inward condition of ease, despite whatever external circumstances are prevailing.
    • We believe that the final condition of the true believer is a place of complete happiness, comfort, and satisfaction, and we strive to attain to that state while still in this dunya; this state is “tubaa,” which is often translated as “every blessedness” (see Qur’an 13:28-29). It is an internal state of satisfaction and joy, peace of mind, tranquility of heart, and serenity of conscience.”

    If we pledge ourselves to the above principles of contentment with the decree of Allah SWT, then we will feel satisfied and accepting of what we are and what we have and what we are dealing with at this moment of life. This is in contrast to the malcontent who says “Woe is me…” in a hundred different ways: “Why me?” “If only I had done this or that!” “If only I were smarter.” “I knew this [horrible thing] was going to happen to me.” The list of statements is endless because the malcontented person finds so much to complain about, to be displeased with, to be disturbed by. On the other hand, the individual who chooses contentment finds benefits and blessings even in the greatest hardship. illustrating this mindset is the profound statement of Imam Ibn Taymiyyah: “I have in my breast both my heaven and my garden. If I travel they are with me, never leaving me. Imprisonment for me is a chance to be alone with my Lord. To be killed is martyrdom, and to be exiled from my land is a spiritual journey.”

    Being contented with the decree of Allah is far different from being passive, given to resignation, and/or lazy. Contentedness is not fatalistic.

    Being contented with the decree of Allah is far different from being passive, given to resignation, and/or lazy. Contentedness is not fatalistic. It is accepting and being fully present where and how and why and what we are right now, and finding so much to be grateful for. Then we can aspire, with liberated energies, for greater good in our relationships with Allah SWT, with self, and with others, all precedents to happiness. Thus, aspiring is not contradictory to contentedness, but emerges out of it.

    Being content is being poised (balanced) in that place between grief and anxiety. It is also balanced in another way: living daily life with a proper, fair, proportional arrangement of activities and responsibilities so that one important aspect of life is not neglected for another. If a man spends all his time working and by doing so neglects his wife and children, then his life is imbalanced and this leads to unhappiness in his life as well as in the lives of his family members. If a woman spends all her time cooking and cleaning and by doing so neglects her religious duties, then her life is imbalanced and this leads to unhappiness in her life as well as in the lives of her family members.

    In that space between grief and anxiety, we institute balance in our daily living and experience a richness of life, moment to moment. “We have made you a nation justly balanced…” (Qur’an 2:143). And the Prophet pbuh said,”Riches does not mean having a great amount of property; riches is self-contentment” (Bukhari). We are content with our present circumstance as it has unfolded from the past, but invigorated to correct mistakes, face our issues, and better ourselves. Choosing to be content is like implanting roots deep into the ground of one’s existence, anchoring the self in the reality of one’s life, and from that starting point seeking out what can nourish and satisfy the soul.

    Optimism (pertaining to the future)

    Optimism has root meanings of “the greatest good,” “the best” and “choice.” So we can say that an optimistic outlook on life is always keeping one’s eye on that which advances goodness, and this is conjoined to making the best choices in all one’s affairs, choices that will, in fact, bring about the greatest good each and every day. Thus, optimism is not a naive and shallow form of positive thinking. It is a deliberate way of looking at the world and viewing the future that rests upon intentional, prudent, and salutary choices. It is recognizing opportunity for betterment, whether in ease or difficulty. Winston Churchill once said, “A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.”

    Consider this verse, “….Verily never will Allah change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves….” (Qur’an 13:11). Shaikh Syed Qutb says about this verse in the “Shade of the Qur’an” that the change this verse refers to is made in the human heart, intention, attitude, and behavior. He points out that this is a high honor from Allah SWT that He has tied His qadar, Divine Destiny, to the choices that a human being makes, which in essence, is choosing his or her destiny. So the optimistic aspect of being happy is looking toward the greatest good, whether in one’s daily life or in the reward of the Hereafter, and knowing that we are given opportunity at every moment to make the best choice and to accept the decree of Allah no matter the outcome: “How wonderful is the affair of the believer, for all his affairs are good for him, and that does not apply to anyone but the believer. If something pleasing happens to him, he is grateful, and that is good for him; and if something harmful happens to him, he bears it with patience, and that is good for him” (Muslim). With an optimistic outlook, the believer also appreciates that adversity might in the long run benefit him (see 2:216) and believes during times of difficulty that relief will come (see 94:05). Islamic teachings give us consummate reason for taking an optimistic view of existing events or conditions and generally expecting a favorable outcome in any given situation, and in the totality of our lives and the reward in the Hereafter.

    Another reason for optimism is knowing that Allah’s mercy is wondrous. The Prophet pbuh, said, “When Allah decreed the Creation, He pledged Himself by writing in His book which is laid down with Him: ‘My mercy prevails over my wrath’”

    Another reason for optimism is knowing that Allah’s mercy is wondrous. The Prophet pbuh, said, “When Allah decreed the Creation, He pledged Himself by writing in His book which is laid down with Him: ‘My mercy prevails over my wrath’” (Bukhari, Muslim, and others). Also, Anas said, “I heard the Messenger of Allah say, Allah Almighty says, ‘O son of Adam! I will forgive you as long as you call on Me and have hope in Me, no matter what you do. Son of Adam, I do not care if your wrong actions reach to the clouds of heaven and then you ask Me for forgiveness, I will forgive you. Son of Adam, if you were to come with sins equivalent in weight to the whole earth and then meet Me having not associated anything with Me, I would come to you with the same amount of forgiveness’” (Al-Tirmidhi). Even if our sins were to “reach to the clouds” or be as weighty as “the whole earth,” Allah SWT offers His mercy and forgiveness equal to that! “Say – in the bounty of Allah, and in His mercy – in that let them rejoice …” (Qur’an 10:58).

    If contentedness is like the firmly fixed root structure of a tree, optimism can be compared to the branches — limbs reaching toward the heavens as the soul strives for ever higher goodness and excellence.

    We can now consider the aspect of happiness that pertains to the present— joy.

    Joy (pertaining to the present)

    Joy is a state of consciousness, as noted by Todd Kashdan, professor at George Mason University, that finds“…beauty and intrigue around us everywhere – as long as we’re open to what’s around us.” With a heightened sense of the present moment, keen attention to detail, getting lost in the “flow,” joy is a dynamic state of wakefulness and excitement and appreciation for whatever one is experiencing, witnessing, endeavoring, or accomplishing. It might be a moment of loving communication with one’s child; watching the sun set over a placid lake; awakening at dawn, putting on jogging shoes and moving into the world of nature and physical fitness; a “voila” moment for a tech person when an elusive computer algorithm finally takes shape in his mind. It might simply be a moment when one is filled with illuminating quietude as flickering intervals of sunlight hide and appear, again and again, among pale green tints of the giant oak newly in leaf, as the freshness of morning announces its springtime delight.

    The capacity for joy, without doubt, can be cultivated. It’s a shame that so much focus is on treating depression with pharmaceuticals rather than on encouraging and teaching people how to be joyful. According to an article by Trish Hall, Op-Ed editor for the New York Times, “…psychology journals have published 45,000 articles in the last 30 years on depression, but only 400 on joy.”

    Joy involves one’s approach to, perception of, and experience in the present. Many think that they will be happy and enjoy life at some hypothetical time in the future, when they get that promotion, go on vacation, pay off all their debt, graduate, get married, lose weight, buy new clothes, and on an on. Yet, Muslims are advised to find joy in the bounty of Allah, which is in the here and now. Consider the verse quoted above about rejoicing in Allah’s mercy: “Say – in the bounty of Allah and in His mercy – in that let them rejoice – that is better than what they hoard” (Qur’an 10:58). To rejoice is “to be joyful (to experience gladness in a high degree; to have pleasurable satisfaction; to be delighted.”) The verse tells us that finding joy in the bounty of Allah and in His mercy is far better than pursuing joy in the things that humans typically seek to acquire — the material things of this world, or to achieve — prestige or power.

    What are the bounties of Allah? All the extraordinary and wondrous objects, properties, processes, phenomena, organisms, creatures, functions, qualities, and so on, that we find in life, nature, the world, and the human condition. Many bounties are pointed to in the Qur’an—the expanse of the earth with its pastures, mountains, and deserts; grains and fruits; health and healing; rain and flowing water; seeds that germinate and grow; language, communication, and guidance; day for gaining livelihood and night for resting; the sun and shadows; kinship and friendship; reason, intuition, and knowledge; striving, meaning, and purpose; free will, consciousness, and creativity; yearning and fulfillment; kindness, gentleness, and compassion. Truly, a multitude of things… but “if you try to count the bounties of Allah, never will you be able to number them” (Qur’an 14:34). How often do we stop and contemplate the beauty, the order and proportion, the small things and fleeting moments that have potential for joy but are so often overlooked? Imagine if more people put “be joyful” on their list of things to accomplish?

    Further, an abundant other realm of joy opens when an individual has chosen to become a devotee to a refinement, in its various aspects, of the self, including:

    • Purification — “By the soul and the proportion and order given to it, and its enlightenment as to its wrong and its right, truly he succeeds who purifies it and he fails who corrupts it” (Qur’an 91:7-10).
    • Transformation —“Verily, God does not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves” (Quran 13:11) and “You shall surely travel from stage to stage” (Qur’an 84:19).
    • Enrichment of the self —“True richness is the richness of the self” (Bukhari and Muslim).
    • Liberation —“Each day a man is a vendor of his soul, either freeing it or bringing it to ruin (Muslim).

    Devotion to the purification, transformation, enrichment, and liberation of the self is catalyst to all the excellent character traits of ihsan, including the intentional cultivation of balance in all things, and following a middle course between extremes. Muslims are called “ummat-al-wasat,” community of the middle way. “We made you to be a community of the middle way, so that [with the example of your lives] you might bear witness to the truth before all humankind” (Qur’an, 2:143). The middle way, for example, is being generous rather than stingy or extravagant, the two opposing extremes. Or being humble rather than self-abasing or self-glorifying. Or being nurturing to one’s children rather than withholding and harsh or overly indulgent and permissive. Even with regard to the practice of religion, the Prophet cautioned against excessiveness. He once said to Abdullah ibn ‘Amr: “Have I heard right that you fast every day and stand in prayer all night?” Abdullah replied, “Yes, 0 Messenger of God.” The Prophet said, “Do not do that. Fast as well as eat and drink. Stand in prayer as well as sleep. This is because your body has a right upon you, your eyes have a right upon you, your wife has a right upon you, and your guest has a right upon you” (Bukhari, Muslim).

    Allah SWT has intended for us a full, rich, life. “O children of Adam! Wear your beautiful apparel at every time and place of prayer. Eat and drink but waste not by excess, for Allah loves not wasters. Say: ‘who has forbidden the beautiful gifts of Allah which He has produced for His servants and the things clean and pure which He has provided for sustenance…” (Qur’an 7:31-32). And further, our lives are to be filled with joy. “For those who believe and work righteousness, is happiness and joy, and bliss at [their] journey’s end” (Qur’an 13:29). One of the salaf (righteous predecessors) is reported to have said, “There are moments that I say to myself, ‘truly if the people of Paradise feel what I feel here on earth, they indeed live a good and joyous life.’”

    Yes, each day is a new journey, a new opportunity to find joy in the bounties of Allah SWT: in His creation, in the camaraderie of social relations, in the diversion of recreation and relaxation, and in the devotion and striving for purification, transformation, enrichment, and liberation of the self. Joy is like the fruit of one’s primal, animate being made intentional, mindful, awe-inspired, and passionate for truth, beauty, and righteousness.

    The Wellspring of Happiness

    Anchoring the self with the deep roots of contentment, striving each day with life and limb and inveterate optimism, and discovering the fruits of joy in the promise of Allah SWT, in the creation, and in one’s own self: that is engaging ourselves to the wellsprings of happiness. It is like cultivating “in my breast both my heaven and my garden,” taking into the personal sanctum of the heart — absorbing into the rich loam of the soul — the germinating words of Divine guidance and wisdom, and watching a goodly tree grow.

    “Have you not seen how God sets forth a similitude? A good word is as a good tree — its roots are firmly fixed, with its branches reaching upward to heaven” (Qur’an 14:24).

     

  • Women and Men: Complementary Halves

    Women and Men: Complementary Halves

    Sarah had heard many negative characterizations of Islam, especially that the religion oppressed women. She didn’t spend much time thinking about these things, one way or the other. It remained a subliminal awareness until the day she met a Muslim woman in her chemistry class during her sophomore year. Aisha and Sarah (names and details have been changed to protect privacy) began spending a lot of time together and over the months, Sarah’s view of Islam and Muslims began to form. Aisha explained that women are honored in Islam, that the status given to the female gender was revolutionary at the time of the Prophet, peace be upon him (pbuh), and that the Qur’an speaks of males and females as partners who support and protect one another and are both charged with the responsibility to enjoin the right and forbid the wrong (9:71). She also shared with Sarah the many beautiful verses about marriage, conveying that husband and wife are imbued with love and mercy so that they incline to live with each other in tranquility (30:21). When Aisha told Sarah about the verse describing the spouses as garments for each other(2:187), Sarah was stunned at how profound and elegant a metaphor this was for a basis of friendship, partnership, and intimacy in marriage. Aisha also shared with her the verses indicating that all human beings are created from a single entity (4:1); that both male and female are given the responsibility as trustees of the earth (17:70 and 2:30); that woman is not blamed for Adam and Eve eating from the forbidden tree but that each is held responsible for their sin (7:19-22); and that males and females are “members, one of another” ( 3:195).

    Men and women are equal in their worth as human beings, and equal in their moral and spiritual responsibility. They are equal as well in their potential to strive for taqwa. In their personal endowments they are variable as individuals, but any individual’s greater talent, beauty, intelligence, strength, or wealth does not render him or her superior.
    The only true superiority is taqwa.

    Especially riveting for Sarah was the verse that clearly showed the equality of men and women before God: “For Muslim men and women, for believing men and women, for devout men and women, for true men and women, for men and women who are patient and constant, for men and women who humble themselves, for men and women who give in charity, for men and women who fast, for men and women who guard their chastity, and for men and women who engage much in Allah’s praise — for them has Allah prepared forgiveness and great reward” (Qur’an 33:35).

    But then it got even better! Sarah was persuaded that Islam really did honor women and grant them their rights, placing them side by side with men in the endeavor to worship God and create a just and compassionate society. And that the only thing that in a real and enduring way brought an individual distinction was his or her piety. This understanding was decisive when Sarah read the verse: “O humankind! We created you from a single (pair) of a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that you may know one another. Verily the most honored of you in the sight of Allah is (one who is) the most righteous of you. And Allah has full knowledge and is well acquainted” (Qur’an 49:13).

    Living in a society that placed so much emphasis on material gain and vain pursuits, Sarah treasured these Divine values. Rather than individuals being highly regarded because of their wealth or their good looks or their celebrity, Islam proclaimed in no uncertain terms that the only true honor, the only genuine superiority is taqwa (righteousness, piety). Sarah was ready to take the next step and declare her surrender to God. Now she understood why Muslims felt discriminated against and thought that some non-Muslims had an agenda to delegitimize Islam and castigate Muslims.

    Since taqwa is the only true standard of superiority, it contradicts the teachings of Islam to infer man’s superiority as a gender from verse 4:34. Superiority through the attaining of taqwa is attainable by any man or woman. We were created precisely for that!

    After taking her shehadah (declaration of faith), a sister invited Sarah to a halaqa (study group) which met once a week. Sarah attended the next get-together and was so happy to meet Muslim women from her community. The group began and a sister who appeared to be the most knowledgeable among them talked about verse 4:34, calling it the qawam verse. She said to the group, “Men and women, according to Islam, are given rights and responsibilities in line with the nature that Allah SWT has given them. But we know from the qawam verse that Allah SWT prefers men and that they are superior to women. This is because of man’s greater strength, and he rules over the woman because he is better than the woman. And this should not….”

    Sarah’s head was spinning. She could barely breathe. This was totally contradictory to what she thought Islam taught about the status of men and women. Sarah had stopped believing in Catholicism years before, when she was sixteen, because she couldn’t believe in a monotheistic God but at the same time believe that He is three parts, the father, the son, and the Holy Ghost. Believing that Jesus is God in the flesh, the second person of the Trinity was just not possible for her. Neither was it possible for her to believe that when given Eucharist, the bread and the wine become the substance of the flesh and the blood of Jesus. She had been told by her parents and her priest countless times that she just had to believe based on faith, and that her reason was subject to error or being misled by Satan. Now she was being asked to believe that God says that the only true honor and superior distinction is taqwa, but at the same time men, men as a gender, all men, are superior to all women, to the female gender.

    We will return to Sarah’s story shortly.

    Only Superiority is Taqwa

    In Gender Equity in Islam, Dr. Jamal Badawi notes, “Nowhere does the Qur’an state that one gender is superior to the other. Some interpreters of the Qur’an mistakenly translate the Arabic word qiwamah (responsibility for the family) with the English word ‘superiority.’ The Qur’an makes it clear that the sole basis for superiority of any person over another is piety and righteousness, not gender, color or nationality.”

    So men and women are equal in their worth as human beings, and equal in their moral and spiritual responsibility. They are equal as well in their potential to strive for taqwa. In their personal endowments they are variable as individuals, but any individual’s greater talent, beauty, intelligence, strength, or wealth does not render him or her superior. The only true superiority is taqwa. In the verse that stipulates the criterion for superiority, we are told “…and the most honored of you in the sight of Allah is he with the most taqwa [piety]” (49:13).In addition to the verse, we are told the same by the Prophet (pbuh)in the Farewell address: “All mankind is from Adam and Eve; an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab or a non-Arab over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over a black or a black over a white, except by piety and good action.” The beautiful thing is that taqwa — the true honor and distinction, ipso facto the only genuine superiority — carries with it no arrogance, no sense of or desire for privilege, and no impulse to control or suppress others.

    Men and women, the two complementary and interdependent halves of humanity, together form a consummate and balanced whole, each part being incomplete in itself without its partner

    It is important to note that equality does not mean the sameness of men and women. While the nature and essential qualities of men and women have more in common than in differentiation, they are, nonetheless, not exactly alike. Shaikh Abdul-Majeed Subh says in his book, Good Argumentation with the Doubters of Islam from the Qur’an, the Torah, the Gospels, and Science, “Equality and sameness are two quite different things. This difference is understandable because man and woman are not identical, but they are created equals.” He goes on to say, “Equality is desirable, just, fair; but sameness is not. People are not created identical – rather – they are created equals.”

    Allah Prefers Some Over Others

    Keeping in mind that taqwa is the true measure of honor and superior distinction, we consider that the man has been designated by Allah SWT as the head (ameer) of the family. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) said, “The man is the guardian of the family and the woman is the guardian of her household” (Bukhari and Muslim). Some Muslims have understood man’s guardianship, as noted above by Dr. Badawi, as indication of his gender superiority; but we can look at a number of points to either support or rebut that understanding.

    The Qur’an says, “Men shall be the protectors and maintainers of women, in that Allah prefers some over others, and in that they support them from their means…” (Qur’an 4:34). Verse 4:32 adds some clarification to this, “Do not envy one another in what Allah has bestowed more on some than on others. To men is a benefit from what they earn and to women is a benefit from what they earn…” (Qur’an 4:32). In both verse 4:32 and 4:34, it says literally that “Allah prefers some over others.” This is a phrase that is used many times in the Qur’an and is variously translated into English as “Allah has bestowed more on some than on others” or “Allah has made some to excel others.” The literal statement “Allah prefers some over others” conveys that each person is endowed by Allah SWT with some gift or gifts more than others. However, each individual must earn his or her merit through putting these gifts to good use, striving with their strengths and talents, their wealth or other resources, to earn Allah’s pleasure. Verse 4:32 stresses this point.

    We should note that there is also some variability of endowment by gender, such as relative greater physical strength and assertiveness in males, and relative greater compassion and emotional intelligence of females. Verse 4:34, as cited above, instructs us that given the particular endowment of men as a gender, they are designated as ameer of the family and commanded to maintain and protect women. A man’s natural endowment of physical strength and assertiveness in no way renders him more meritorious than the woman. In fact, brute strength (strength not refined by a moral and spiritual imperative) and brutish aggression (assertiveness not refined by a moral and spiritual imperative) have been the driving forces of tyranny and oppression throughout human history. Only when these traits are refined, do they serve the divinely decreed purpose of engendering and safeguarding individual, family, and humanity’s rights and responsibilities and well-being.

    The predominant local cultural practices and the actions of some Muslims tend to reinforce erroneous perceptions of the Islamic perspective

    The phrase “Allah prefers some over others,” nevertheless, has been interpreted by some as a general statement of male superiority, as if Allah SWT has a special liking for men, favoring them over women. Those who understand it this way need then to reconcile their view with the following: The phrase “Allah prefers some over others” and its linguistic variants are mentioned many times in the Qur’an, sometimes referring to the prophets, to some individuals over others, or to one group over others. In one such verse Allah SWT says, “O Children of Israel! Remember the favor which I bestowed upon you, and that I preferred you to all others” (Qur’an 2:122).

    Were the Children of Israel preferred by Allah SWT because of some innate superiority? Did Allah SWT like the Children of Israel better than other tribes or nations? Or was that “preferring” for a purpose that was to be put to the test? In fact, Allah SWT will ask each soul on the Day of Accountability about the favors He bestowed on them, “What did you do about them (the favors)?” Being chosen or preferred as the recipient of Allah’s favor does not indicate any intrinsic superiority or merit. When Allah SWT “preferred” the Bani Isra’il to all others, He was choosing that community to have prophets raised up within its midst. This was, indeed, an honor from Allah, but at the same time, on the human side, it was a test and a challenge. “It is He who has made you [human beings] the vicegerents of the earth. He has raised you in ranks, some above others, that He may try you in the gifts He has given you. For your Lord is quick in punishment; yet He is indeed Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful” (Qur’an 6:165). The “preferring” of the Bani Isra’il was not to be taken by the Hebrew people as grounds for a sense of superiority. But this desire to be superior has gripped the egos of so many individuals, groups, and cultures throughout history — white supremacists believing they are superior based on their skin color; Hindus believing that the Brahman or priestly caste is superior to other castes; Nazis and neo-Nazis believing that the Aryan race is superior to all other races; aristocrats believing themselves to be superior to the masses based on their class and wealth, and so on. In fact, social psychology studies the human tendency to overestimate one’s own positive qualities and abilities and underestimate the negative qualities, relative to others, calling this phenomenon “illusory superiority.”

    The Qur’an, however, declares the proper criterion, making it exceptionally clear the “preferring” of an individual or a group to be the recipient of some divine gift is meant as a blessing and a test — strength, beauty, intelligence, wisdom, talent, wealth or any other gifted attribute or resource that might be used for good, or is necessary to fulfill a particular task or responsibility, is to be seen as a province for gratitude, striving, testing, and accountability. That is the case with regard to the husband being the leader of the family and the maintainer and protector of his wife. To repeat, verse 4:32 cited above advises us that we are not to envy those freely bestowed gifts because we deserve no praise for them. The benefit in the form of merit, well-being, or reward results from using those gifts to do good. We have to earn the merit. And by utilizing the resources that Allah SWT bestows upon an individual, he or she can do good deeds and strive for taqwa, thus earning the only distinction of true honor and superior rank.

    Another notable point about the phrase “Allah prefers some over others” is a grammatical one. The statement does not say that Allah prefers men over women; in fact, the male plural form is used for both words “some” and “others.” The male plural form can indicate plural males or plural humans, i.e., males and females. So if we take the phrase literally rather than idiomatically, it would mean that Allah prefers some males over other males, or that He prefers some humans (males and females) over other humans (males and females). Since neither of these meanings fits with the inference that Allah prefers men over women, this accords perfectly with the idea that this phrase is idiomatic, conveying that Allah bestows His gifts and bounties upon human beings, variously and in different degrees, according to His Will; but we are not to envy these as whatever we have been gifted with requires our good intention and effort to put that bounty to beneficial use and thus earn a reward.

    Within this framework, men as a gender have been given certain bounties and women as a gender have been given certain bounties. Since taqwa is the only true standard of superiority, it contradicts the teachings of Islam to infer man’s superiority as a gender from verse 4:34. Superiority through the attaining of taqwa is attainable by any man or woman. We were created precisely for that! “O humankind! Worship your Guardian Lord, who created you and those who came before you that you may attain taqwa” (Qur’an 2:21).

    Men and Women as Guardians

    The qawam verse, when interpreted to mean the superiority of men, is understood to convey that men must manage the affairs of women because women are “inferior” to men. Isn’t it much more balanced to understand that men are charged with the responsibility to support and protect women given that women have been given the role of childbearing and childrearing. This is a division of labor that makes perfect sense and has been naturally enacted in most human cultures throughout history. A male-centric interpretation of qawam renders the woman as inferior and thus needing someone to guard and manage her affairs because she is incapable of doing so herself. Let’s consider a female-centric interpretation just for the sake of balance. Perhaps the wife and children are so precious, so valuable to the husband/father, so integral to the ongoing propagation and success of the society, that she (and by extension, the children) should be supported and protected. Rather than seeing the woman as inferior, we can see her as greatly treasured, beloved, held in high regard, and charged with the task of raising children, and therefore worthy of support and protection. In fact, that interpretation corresponds perfectly with the practical sunnah (the actions and behaviors witnessed by others) of the Prophet(pbuh), his high regard for women and his sensitivity to the burdens they shoulder. It is reported that he said, “When I begin the prayer, I intend to prolong it. Then I hear the crying of a child, so I shorten it knowing the distress of the child’s mother” (Bukhari). It is reported that when the Prophet (pbuh) saw women and children he would stand upright with joy and walk toward them and say, “By Allah, you are the most beloved people to me.”

    The image of twin halves fits perfectly with the verse that states that males and females are “members, one of another” ( 3:195)

    Another example of the Prophet’s high regard for women is indicated when the companions inquired of the him, saying, “Guide us to a treasure so we can invest in it.” The Prophet (pbuh) answered, “Invest in a righteous woman” (Ibn Majah). Seeing women as greatly valued, beloved, held in high regard (as opposed to seeing her as inferior) also accords perfectly with the verses in the Qur’an that have been cited previously. The beautiful balance of gender relations is further indicated in verse 4:34 which goes on to say that the righteous women “guard al-ghayb (the unseen).” Shaikh Abdullah Adhami says, “Most exegetes understood this as protecting the privacy of the husband or father or brothers. This is not how the prophet described it.” Shaikh Adhami indicates that protecting al-ghayb has to do with protecting the realm that is not material (the husband takes care of that); the non-material realm is the domain of nurturance, of kinship, of human relations. He says, “The man protects the physical and the woman protects the metaphysical which [is a domain that] is much larger. The man is defending the castle while women are entrusted with the metaphysical dimension.” We can say that the man’s guardianship of the family applies primarily to the outward, practical functionalities of survival and success of the family unit, particularly as it relates to the family existing and thriving in relation to the outside world. The woman’s guardianship of her household is applied primarily to the nurturing, expressive harmonies of survival and success within the family itself, and its various bonds of kinship. These spheres of authority and influence are not mutually exclusive, but overlapping and complementary. These are interdependent spheres of responsibility that are mutually enhancing.

    Shaikh Adhami supports the understanding of “guarding al-ghayb” as being more than the narrow understanding of protecting the privacy of males in the household by pointing out that “some women live in all female households, no father or brother, or husband. No males. Does this mean that we [they, the women] have to await the coming of a human being with masculine genes to fulfill this role?” [the role of guarding al-ghayb]. He also mentions the hadith that tells us that one will never enter Jannah until he or she believes, and that true belief requires loving one another. Shaikh Adhami indicates that this is about the spiritual kinship between believers. And this is the realm that women guard and nurture. In fact, he calls women the spiritual anchor of society.

    A Degree Over Women

    Some commentators have also cited the “degree” verse as evidence of Allah’s preference for men, of their superiority: “And the divorced women shall undergo, without remarrying, a waiting-period of three monthly courses: for it is not lawful for them to conceal what God may have created in their wombs, if they believe in God and the Last Day. And during this period their husbands are fully entitled to take them back, if they desire reconciliation; but, in accordance with justice, the rights of the wives [with regard to their husbands] are equal to the [husbands’] rights with regard to them, although men have precedence over them [in this respect]. And God is almighty, wise” (2:228).

    This reference to a degree or step over women (in the above translation “precedence over them”) is mentioned with regard to divorce. However, many commentators take the degree as a generalized degree of precedence or right of men over women. But even if we take the generalized meaning, it does not confer some innate and meritorious ranking of men in general over women in general. In the commentary of Al-Qurtubi, he quotes Ibn Abbas(RAA), the companion for whom the Prophet (pbuh) would often make du’a, supplicating, “O Lord, make him acquire a deep understanding of the religion of Islam and instruct him in the meaning and interpretation of things.” Al-Qurtubi quotes Ibn Abbas as saying, “The degree is an indication for a man to live with his wife in the best manner of companionship, to be generous in his financial provision, to treat her with the best of kindness, respect, and so on. The degree is a motivation for bearing the burdens of responsibility.” Al-Qurtubi further commented by mentioning that Ibn-Attiah (RAA)said about Ibn-Abbas’ comment that he concurs with his understanding of the degree and that “indeed this is an excellent and outstanding commentary.”

    Does a Greater Degree of Right/Responsibility Confer Superiority?

    Those who view the qawam verse and the degree verse as conferring superiority of men over women, do so based on the husband’s greater right/responsibility (role of qawam) as regards his wife. We are disregarding for a moment the criterion of taqwa as the measure superiority. Then we can look at the meaning of superiority and see that it indicates something being higher in station, rank, degree, or importance than some other thing. In the case under consideration, according to those who see men as superior to women, men would have a higher station, rank, degree, or importance than women due to some greater right tied to a greater responsibility, even burden, that men bear. But we have to reconcile that with a sound hadith in which it is reported that the Prophet (pbuh) was asked, “Who has the most rights over the woman?” The Prophet (pbuh) answered, “the husband.” Then he was asked “Who has the most rights over the man?” The Prophet answered, “the mother” (Al-Hakim in Al-Mustadrak). This means that the husband (a man) has the most rights over the wife (a woman); and a mother (a woman) has the most rights over her son (a man). In a graphic depiction of that statement we would see a male individual in station or rank above a woman (his wife), and below a woman (his mother).

    The rank or station of an individual in the social structure of family serves a function, creating the greatest efficacy in survival and thriving of that family unit. If we stretch that functionality, for (the male-centric) argument’s sake, to imply superiority in some innate way, then we end up with mothers (women) being of the highest superiority, based on the above hadith. Is it not best that we do away with the mindset that links a station — and the rights and responsibilities it carries — with any indication of superiority? In fact, the social configuration pointed to in the above hadith, rather than making a case for superiority of some human beings based on their gender, ties men and women in a unified partnership; this is a cooperative human endeavor to worship Allah SWT and attain to peace individually and societally; this is a fellowship that highlights bonds of kinship, common belief, and mutual gratitude and respect. To repeat: Is it not best that we do away with the mindset that links a station — and the rights and responsibilities it carries — with any indication of superiority?

    The Superlative Islamic Model for Gender Relations – Complementary Halves

    Dr. Badawi writes in Gender Equity in Islam, “According to Prophet Muhammad’s saying, ‘Women are but shaqa’iq (sisters or twin halves) of men.’ This hadith is a profound statement that directly relates to the issue of human equality between the genders. If the first meaning of shaqa’iq is adopted, it means that a male is worth one half (of society), with the female worth the other half. Can ‘one half’ be better or bigger than the other half? Is there a more simple but profound physical image of equality? If the second meaning, ‘sisters’ is adopted, it implies the same. The term ‘sister’ is different from ‘slave’ or ‘master.’”

    The image of twin halves fits perfectly with the verse that states that males and females are “members, one of another” ( 3:195). Using the image of twin halves conveys that women and men have equal status as human beings and as spiritual aspirants. Again, the role of leader is contractual and functional, to allow for the greatest efficiency and success in the family, a division of labor and interdependence of roles that makes perfect sense. And at the core of that relationship is a surrendering of hearts. Consider the hadith of Umm Zara’.

    Aisha (RAA) related to the Prophet (pbuh) about eleven women who were sitting and sharing details about their husbands during the pre-Islamic days. Umm Zara’ praised her husband eloquently and included the following points: She said that “When I am with him, whatever I say I am not made to feel humiliated or embarrassed. My faults are always covered by him.” She went on to say, “He surrendered to me so much in the heart that I loved myself.” At the end of the narration, the Prophet said to Aisha, “I am to you like Abu Zara’ was to his wife Umm Zara’.” (Bukhari, Muslim, and others) Abu Zara’ honored his wife in such a noble way that she loved herself. And the Prophet (pbuh) validated this honoring of a spouse in this fashion by telling A’isha that he was to her as Abu Zara’ was to his wife.

    Twin halves, spouses surrendering hearts to each other, husband and wife being garments for each other, men and women as proceeding from one another, as being friends and supporters of one another, the living, practical sunnah of the Prophet and how he interacted with and perceived women generally and, in particular, his wives — all this points to men and women being the two complementary and interdependent halves of humanity. They together form a consummate and balanced whole, each part being incomplete in itself without its partner. And each partner offering to the family and to society some resource, some capabilities, some assets that the other partner does not naturally or readily possess.

    We should ask ourselves: would Allah SWT designate women as the first teachers of every human child if she is weak, inferior, and deficient? Is it just coincidental that the first person to declare shahadah was Khadijah (RAA), a woman; that when the Prophet married Khadijah, she was fifteen years older than him, a businesswoman who had hired him and used her resources to facilitate his success in business and then his divine mission; is it just coincidence that the first martyr was Sumayyah Bint Khabbab (RAA), a woman; that Aisha (RAA), the Prophet’s beloved wife after Khadijah, was a learned, strong woman, narrator of the second largest number of hadith — is all of this just coincidental? Could not the crucial and strong part that women played in the first years of the Islamic venture be a message that women are not to be pushed to the side or diminished in their status and role?

    Sarah spoke at length with Aisha about her confusion after attending the study group. She was reassured of her original understanding of the equal standing of women in the sight of Allah SWT. Not too long after she married a man named Ali (names and some details have been changed to protect privacy) who she had been introduced to at the mosque. She felt like the luckiest woman in the world as he was gentle, understanding, and kind while being a strong, manly man at the same time. Three years later Sarah and her husband ended up in the office of a Muslim marriage counselor. Sarah related that she felt unloved, that her husband provided well and had the very best character that she could ever want in a husband. But she felt that there was some wedge between them, that he never fully considered her a true life-partner and peer, that he never made himself vulnerable to her, that he withdrew emotionally when she offered her opinion any time they were making a decision related to the marriage or household.

    In a private session with the counselor, Ali dug deep within his capacity for self-examination and offered the counselor the following explanation for the wedge that Sarah felt. He said, “I realized after a lot of reflection about this that my father’s perception of my mother and of women in general has prevented me from really committing to Sarah and being the kind of partner and companion that she wants so badly…and that I should be and want to be. Whenever my dad got frustrated or annoyed with my mom, which was very, very often, he would say things like “a woman can lead even a good man astray” or “ I should have known this would happen, women are just bad luck” or “you are ungrateful just like every other woman” or “what do you know, you are deficient in your thinking” and other things like that. I know there are hadith that express these notions about women but I really have a problem putting those things out of my mind in my daily interactions and my overall relationship with Sarah. Maybe other men can do that – put those things out of their minds – but I have not been able to do that. I find it difficult to ask for her opinion… or to trust her completely..or to ever really let my guard down with her. It’s a problem for me and it’s a problem for Sarah.

    Concluding Remarks

    Dr. Jamal Badawai wrote, “The issue of gender equity is important, relevant and current. Debates and writings on the subject are increasing and are diverse in their perspectives. The Islamic perspective on the issue is the least understood and most misrepresented by non-Muslims and, at times, by some Muslims as well. The predominant local cultural practices in different parts of the world and the actions of some Muslims tend to reinforce erroneous perceptions of the Islamic perspective. These problems are enhanced by the tendency to treat some juristic interpretations as if they were identical with Islam. As such, there is a pressing need to re-examine this issue in the light of the primary sources of Islam. …In identifying what is ‘Islamic’ it is necessary to make a clear distinction between the primary sources of Islam — the Qur’an and the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (s) — and legal opinions derived from them by scholars in regard to specific issues. The process of extracting laws from the primary sources is a human function. The surmise of legal practitioners may therefore vary considerably and be influenced by their specific times, circumstances, and cultures. Obviously, opinions and verdicts of human beings do not enjoy the authority or the finality accorded to the primary sources, which God revealed.”

    The Qur’an and the sunnah constitute Islam, but in the final analysis, all things must be judged by and accord with the Criterion, which is the Qur’an. We can rightfully expect that words and actions attributed to the Prophet (pbuh) will not depart, as Ibn Khaldun wrote, from “the common sense meaning of the Quran, from the recognized principles of Shariah, the rules of logic, the evidence of sense, or any other self-evident truth.”

    Jeffrey Lang, who converted to Islam in the 1980s, wrote in Struggling to Surrender – Some Impressions of an American Convert to Islam, “…I needed a better understanding of the place of hadith (the Prophetic traditions) in the life of my new community. I was about to enter a maze of confusion, distortion, suspicion, and dogma, a field to be explored only submissively and superficially, in which there is little room for misgiving. It is to this science that orientalism directs its most formidable criticism. Unfortunately, the literature written by Muslim scholars, whether originally in English or translated from other languages, to counteract this attack has been an entirely inadequate response. And the need for an effective response is urgent for Muslims living in the West, because this subject plays an important role in directing and binding the community, and in meeting the challenge of self-maintenance in a radically foreign environment. A convert to Islam quickly discovers the need to adopt a position on the role of the Sunnah and the hadith in his or her life. The problem is that the options presented are so extreme that many converts soon come to feel estranged from the community they have joined. In my opinion, this situation could be avoided if there were a real chance for honest and open discussion on this subject. “

    In between the orthodox position that the corpus of ahadith is sacrosanct and that every hadith designated as sahihis indisputable, without any possibility of contradiction or error, and the opposite extreme position of those who reject the ahadith entirely, is a middle way. Revisiting the issue of the status of women and gender relations and those ahadith that are pertinent to the endeavor, that have troubled so many Muslim women, some Muslim men, and too many inquiring non-Muslims, it might be found that some one or more of the ahadith that appear to demean women have resolutions that are not esoteric or complex. For example, in Sahih Bukhari and Muslim is the hadith that Abu Hurayrah reported the Prophet (pbuh) as saying, “Bad omens are in a woman, a house and a horse.” There are many scholastic explanations that try to reconcile this with the hadith found in Ahmad, Abu Dawood, Al-Tirmidhi, and Ibn Majah that states, “Tiyarah (belief in evil omens) is shirk.” However, a very simple resolution is found in a hadith in the Musnad of Ahmad ibn Hanbal, in which Abu-Hassan (RAA) reports that two people came to Aisha and said to her that Abu Hurayrah (RAA) narrates that the Prophet used to say that bad luck is to be found only in women, horses, and houses. At this Aisha replied, “By the God who revealed the Qur’an to the Prophet! The Prophet never said this; what he did say was that the people of the jahilliyyah hold this opinion.”

    How many Muslim women have suffered from believing that the Prophet (pbuh) of Allah declared that in a woman may be a portending of evil or disaster or unhappiness! And how many Muslims have been troubled by the obvious contradiction of the Prophet declaring the belief in omens to be shirk and then him stating that in women, horses, and houses might be bad omens! And how simple is the solution when we find the statement of Aisha that the Prophet never said this but rather that the people of the time of ignorance used to say this. That version accords with the spirit and guidance of the Qur’an. It also accords with the practical sunnah of the Prophet (pbuh) in how he perceived and treated women. Is this not a common sense resolution? What other faith-enhancing resolutions might be found by a scholarly re-examining of ahadith that appear to demean women?

    There is no doubt that the devotional and meticulous efforts made by the great compilers of ahadith will stand in an enduring way throughout time. Our gratitude for their extraordinary accomplishments cannot be overstated. Nonetheless, they were human beings who were not invulnerable to error. We do no damage to their contribution, their legacy, and their honor by having reputable scholars look with discerning eye at the ahadith collections with the tools and knowledge of our times, circumstances, and retrospective understanding.

    May Allah SWT grant this ummah ever greater numbers of surpassing scholars, including female scholars of Islam, who are willing to revisit the issue of the status of woman and gender relations with courage, truthfulness, and piety. May our and their intention be solely to strive for the pleasure of Allah SWT; to do honor to His Message and the truthful representation of the esteemed Prophet (pbuh) of Islam in his mastery of living, in his embodiment of goodness, wisdom, and compassion; and to adhere to the paradigm of gender relations as provided by Allah SWT. In that way, men and women may be drawn in, brought together optimally in a contract to live in love, mercy, and tranquility — with nothing blocking or dividing their affiliation and affection, all under the auspices of their Covenant with Allah SWT. “And who is truer to his covenant than Allah? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success” (Qur’an 9:111).

    “O humankind! We created you from a single [pair] of a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that you may know one another. Verily the most honored of you in the sight of Allah is [one who is] the most righteous of you. And Allah has full knowledge and is well acquainted” (Qur’an 49:13).

  • Why Know Muhammad? (pbuh)

    Why Know Muhammad? (pbuh)

    History has catalogued many successful leaders. Some have been great in military affairs, others in political governance. Many of them, however, were self-serving and quite willing to use cunning, deception, and all manner of unscrupulous craft in obtaining and keeping their positions of power. In our contemporary times, similarly, our leaders too often betray the trust of their offices. We see political leaders who are prone to wrongdoing, often at the behest of powerful elites, more concerned about maintaining some political advantage or self-interest rather than doing what is right or what is in the best interest of a people, a nation, or the world community. But we are witnessing the awakening of the masses, the rising up of a force that can potentially sweep the globe and demand leaders who are honest, sincere, and committed to social justice.

    He was the best example of a leadership style that teaches and guides by being a good model, inspires others rather than dictating,  and empowers others rather than diminishing or demeaning anyone

    In studies about leadership, a “socialized” power motivation is one that is primarily concerned with using its influence to improve the well-being of the commonweal, to use power in a responsible fashion to bring about a positive impact on the lives of all, collectively and individually. If we consider this as the foundation for great leadership, there are a number of traits that then build on that foundation and form the edifice of exceptional influence and authority. These include: self-confidence; a commitment to core values; genuine caring about one’s followers; tenacity of purpose and courageous action-orientation; intelligence, resourcefulness, and creativity; insight into people and situations and the ability to form respectful, empowering relationships; willingness to share decision-making and to be influenced by others.

    We can make a powerful case that one historical figure whose motivation was revealed as a sublime purity of heart and soul, who embodied the traits that make for great leadership, and who held himself impervious to the corrupting influence of power, is the beloved Prophet of Islam, Muhammad, peace be upon him.

    Purity of Motivation

    The Prophet said in the well-known hadith, “Actions are but by intention and every man shall have but that which he intended…” (Bukhari and Muslim). Indication early on in his mission that he was acting solely for the sake of God in his role as messenger, leader, teacher, and mercy to humankind, is the story of how the Prophet’s uncle pleaded with him to ease the burden of persecution by giving up his mission. The head of the Quraish had come to Abu Talib, Muhammad’s uncle, to warn him that either his nephew stop preaching Islam or the Quraish would fight Abu Talib and Muhammad until the tribe prevailed and the Muslims were dead. When Abu Talib related to the Prophet what the Quraish leader had told him, and conveyed that the pressure of persecution was weighing heavily upon them, the Prophet answered him, “O uncle, by Allah, if they put the sun in my right hand and the moon in my left hand to end this affair – until Allah prevails or I die for His cause, indeed I will never leave it.” His purity of intention, the most noble of motivations, are borne out by the full scope of the Prophet’s lifetime.

    Exemplary Traits of Personality and Character

    The purity of motivation demonstrated by Muhammad was matched by the exemplary traits of personality and character that made him so beloved by his companions and by Muslims around the world in the 1400 plus years since he lived. If we look at the traits that are commonly enumerated in studies and analysis of great leadership, we see that the Prophet embodied all of them.

    Self-Confidence

    The Prophet’s self-confidence was based in tawakkul, complete trust in, and reliance on, Allah SWT and knowing that all things in one’s life are according to His Will and Wisdom. “Then when you have decided on a course of action, put your trust in Allah; Allah loves those who put their trust in Him. If Allah helps you, no one can overcome you. If he forsakes you, who is there after that who can help you? In God then let believers put their trust” (Qu’ran 3: 159-160). The Prophet’s utter trust in Allah led him to a confidence that was unassailable but nevertheless centered in humbleness. Thus he avoided the arrogance and pride that often beset leaders. This self-confidence exemplified the Qur’anic description of the servants of Allah, that they “are those who walk on the earth in humility, and when the ignorant address them, they say, ‘Peace!’” (Qur’an 25:63).

    Prophet Muhammad’s adherence to moral  and ethical principles was evident throughout his life, both before and after the inception of his mission

    When the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah was being written, the Prophet was drawing up the terms of the treaty with Suhayl ibn Amr, the Quriash envoy. The Prophet instructed Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, to write, “In the name of God, the Merciful, the Beneficent.” Suhayl objected, saying “I do not know this. Write down, ‘In Your name, Our Lord.’ The Prophet told Ali to write that and then to write, “These are the terms of the peace agreement negotiated between Muhammad, God’s Messenger and Suhayl ibn Amr.’ Suhayl objected again, saying, “Had we accepted that you are God’s messenger, we would not have fought you. You have to write down your name and your father’s name.” The Prophet told Ali to write “These are the terms of peace agreed by Muhammad ibn Abdullah and Suhayl ibn Amr.” According to the narration of Al-Bara bin Azib (Bukhari), Ali replied, “I will not be the person to rub it [“it” meaning the words, “Muhammad, God’s messenger”] so the Prophet rubbed it out. And Suhayl’s wording was used.

    What is evident here is that the Prophet was not acting out of ego, but out of his pure dedication to the cause of Allah SWT. With the confidence of that noble mission, he was humble and willing to accede to the other negotiator’s stipulations since it did not compromise Islamic precepts and allowed the treaty to be put in place.

    Social Justice and Commitment to Highest Ideals

    Prophet Muhammad’s adherence to moral and ethical principles was evident throughout his life, both before and after the inception of his mission. This can be summed up by Aisha’s reply to someone who asked about his morals. She said, “His character and morals were the Qur’an” (Muslim, Ahmad, Abu Dawood). There is a line of prose above the Prophet’s tomb in Medina, penned by the scholar Abdullah Al-Haddad: “A might prophet whose nature was that character which God has extolled in the best of Books.” The Qur’an confirms this: “You have indeed in the Apostle of God a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for anyone whose hope is in God and the Final Day and who engages much in the praise of God” (Qur’an 33:21).

    From the very beginning of his mission, Muhammad (pbuh) advocated for social justice

    From the very beginning of his mission, Muhammad advocated for social justice. This brought the full brunt of hatred and desire for revenge from the Quraish elites. The Prophet called for taking care of the needy, providing for widows and orphans, ensuring that the rights of women not be impeded by men, or slaves by their masters, or the ruled by the rulers. In all ways, he was the inveterate champion of the poor, the disadvantaged, and the oppressed.

    Before his call to prophethood, Muhammad ibn Abdullah was known by his people as an honest and trustworthy person. He was given the epithet Al-Amin, meaning “the trustworthy” by his kinsmen as he was seen as honest, fair, and true to his word. This trustworthiness, of course, continued throughout his life, whether in personal dealings or in relations with other communities, both with allies and foes. Once a treaty was entered into, the Prophet faithfully abided by it even when it brought him great pain such as the stipulation in the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah that any young Muslim who left the Quraish to join Muhammad in Medina and did so without their father’s or guardian’s permission, would be returned to the Quraish.

    Throughout his life, the Prophet’s humbleness was apparent. He certainly was the most honorable of human beings and had more responsibility than anyone by carrying the mantle of prophethood. Yet he never conveyed that he was better than others, never sought to be privileged more-so than anyone else, or ever behaved in an arrogant, domineering way. It is related in Khulasat As-Siyarr that once the Prophet (pbuh) was traveling with some companions and when it was time to prepare food, he asked them to slaughter a sheep. One man said he would do it, another said he would skin it, and a third said he would cook it. The Messenger of Allah said, “I will collect the wood for the fire.” They said, “No we will do that for you.” The Prophet answered, “I know that you can do it for me, but I hate to be privileged. Allah hates to see a servant of His privileged above others.” And the Prophet went and collected firewood. When dignitaries came to visit the Prophet, they could not at first tell which one he was because of his humbleness, avoidance of any ostentation, or accepting of any privilege. In fact, he did not allow that people stand up for him when he approached a gathering, or that any person walk behind him. He was the best example of a leadership style that teaches and guides by being a good model, inspires others rather than dictating, and empowers others rather than diminishing or demeaning anyone.

    Aisha (RAA) said, “The Messenger of Allah, whenever he is given the opportunity to choose between two affairs, he always chooses the easiest and most convenient. But if he is certain that it is sinful, he will be as far as he could from it. He has never avenged himself; but when the sanctity of Allah is violated, he would. That would be for Allah’s sake, not for himself. He is the last one to get angry and the first to be satisfied. His hospitality and generosity are matchless. His gifts and endowments manifest a man who does not fear poverty” (Bukhari).

    The Prophet was also the most eloquent and fluent but was unpretentious and straightforward in his manner of speaking. He would often remain silent for a long period, and when he spoke it was decisive and to the point at hand. If he heard some news of a person’s inappropriate or bad behavior, he would never name the person, but rather would say, “Why do certain people do such-and-such…” He never focused on or sought out the shortcomings of others. Neither did he disparage people. On the contrary, he was patient and forgiving, always looking to teach and inspire the people to improve themselves, and his own speech and conduct were the best example.

    The Prophet (pbuh) lived in the most modest and simple manner. When he was at home with his family, he was cheerful and pleasant, exemplifying his pronouncement that “A believer gets along well with others and is easy to get along with” (Al-Daraqutni). If he was served by anyone, he was the first to serve others. When he was not attending to his prophetic duties, he was helping with the domestic chores and responsibilities. He used to repair his own shoes, mend his own clothing, and milk the goats. The household servants were fed and clothed the same as the Prophet and his family. He toiled alongside the other men in digging a ditch on the northern side of Medina before the Battle of the Trench in anticipation of the approaching 10,000 men from Arab and Jewish tribes. Likewise in building the mosque in Medina, he labored with the others to build the square enclosure with palm trunks and mud walls.

    Fairness was another surpassing trait of Prophet Muhammad. In arbitrating a dispute between individuals, Muslim or non-Muslim, friend or enemy, rich or poor — it mattered not to him as only a fair arbitration and equitable resolution was important. Even before the call to prophethood, people would bring their disputes to him. While in Medina, the pagans and the Jews accepted his arbitration, knowing he would not skew his perception and decision by bias of any sort. Throughout his life, he operated according to the Qur’anic ordinance, “O you who believe! Stand out firmly for God, as witnesses to fair dealing, and let not the hatred of others toward you make you swerve to wrong and depart from justice. Be just; that is next to piety…” (Qur’an 5:9).

    One time a Jewish man to whom he owed a sum of money came to him and started to accost him verbally about repaying the debt. Umar (RAA) was present and became enraged at the disrespect shown to the Prophet. But Muhammad rebuked Umar, saying, “It is better that you would advise both of us — me the debtor to repay the debt with gratitude; and him the creditor to demand it in a more becoming manner.” And then the Prophet paid the Jewish man what he owed him and an additional amount.
    At the same time, he warned those who came to him with their disputes to be honest in their presentation of their position, saying, “I am only a human being and you bring your disputes to me. Perhaps some of you are more eloquent in their plea than others and I judge in their favor according to what I hear from them. So, whatever I rule in anyone’s favor which belongs to his brother, he should not take any of it, because I have only granted him a piece of hell” (Bukhari). Again, here, we see his commitment to honesty, fairness, and even-handedness.

    Other traits such as mercy, leniency, and forgiveness were also central to the message conveyed by Prophet Muhammad, and once again, he practiced superlatively what he preached. The Prophet said, “Gentleness adorns everything and its absence leaves everything defective” (Al-Albaany, Saheeh Al-Jame’). And the Prophet was the epitome of human gentleness and kindness. His benevolence toward people was at the heart of the success of his mission. Once he was giving the khutbah and his grandson came into the masjid. He was very young and was wearing a new red outfit that was long and trailed on the ground. As he approached, he tripped and fell. The Prophet stopped his khutbah, walked down the two steps of the minbar and picked up his grandson and tenderly comforted him. The Arab men of that time were not quick to show tenderness or a soft heart in public. But the Prophet taught the lessons well. He did not hesitate to show that gentle, loving side.

    When the Prophet was wounded during the Battle of Uhud, a Muslim near him implored him to curse those who were intent on killing him and annihilating the Muslims. The Prophet answered him, “I have not been sent to curse but as an inviter to good and mercy. O Lord! Guide my people, for they know not.”

    In one incident, a man from Medina, Ibaad Ibn Sharjil, was suffering from extreme hunger. He entered a private orchard and picked some fruit to eat. The owner of the orchard caught him and beat him, tearing at his clothes. The poor man appealed to the Prophet who rebuked the owner of the orchard, telling him, “This man was ignorant, you should have dispelled his ignorance; he was hungry, you should have fed him.” The man’s clothes were restored and, in addition, some grain was given to him (Abu Dawood).

    When the Muslims were victorious and entered Mecca after twenty years of persecution, torture, and war waged against them, Prophet Muhammad’s mercifulness and forgiveness were elegantly on display. The Prophet pronounced a general amnesty. He addressed the people assembled at the Kaaba, saying “O Quraish, what do you think should be the treatment I accord you?” They answered, “Mercy, O Prophet of Allah. We expect nothing but good from you.” Muhammad then declared, “I speak to you in the same words as Yusuf spoke to his brothers. This day there is no reproof against you; Go your way, for you are free” (Muslim).

    Tenacity of Purpose and Courageous Action-Orientation

    As already mentioned in the discussion of motivation, the Prophet persevered despite the abject persecution he and his followers endured. He never wavered in his striving to fulfill the mission assigned to him by Allah SWT. While the most humble and modest of men in times of peace, when necessary he had the courage and tenacity to meet any challenge to the well-being of the fledgling Muslim community. He did not fear those who daily avowed their enmity towards him, and despite their voiced intentions to harm or kill him if he persisted in his call to Islam, he moved about Mecca with purposeful conviction. When his followers were suffering terribly by the persecution, he instructed them to immigrate to Abyssinia where, he said, “a king rules without injustice, a land of truthfulness — until God leads us to a way out of our difficulty.” Muhammad stayed behind in Mecca to continue calling to Islam. When the Prophet and his companion Abu Bakr were on their way to Medina, they were pursued by some of the Quraish and took refuge in a cave. Abu Bakr feared they would be found and Muhammad assured him with calm resoluteness that they were safe, saying, “Allah is with us.” One time the Prophet was journeying alone and stopped to rest under a tree. A man from among the opponents of Islam and its followers came upon him and drew his sword, shouting, “Who can save you now from my hands?” The Prophet replied with utter equanimity, “Allah.” In a moment’s time the sword was in the Prophet’s hand and he asked the same question of his aggressor. The man’s demeanor now was humbled and frightened, and the Prophet let him go on his way.

    Intelligence and Creativity

    In a time rife with superstition, Muhammad was ever the practical realist. When Ibrahim his beloved son died, an eclipse of the sun occurred. People starting spreading the idea that this was a miracle, a sign in nature of sadness over the death. Upon hearing of these rumors, the Prophet is reported to have said, “The sun and the moon are signs of God. They are eclipsed neither for the death nor birth of any man. On beholding an eclipse, therefore, remember God and turn to Him in prayer” (“The Life of Muhammad” by Muhammad Husayn Haykal).

    Another incident demonstrates his quick and natural intelligence. A report was narrated by Abu Huraira: “A bedouin came to Allah’s Apostle and said, ‘My wife has delivered a black boy, and I suspect that he is not my child.’ Allah’s Apostle said to him, ‘Have you got camels? ‘The bedouin said, ‘Yes.’ The Prophet said, ‘What color are they?’ The bedouin said, ‘They are red.’ The Prophet said, ‘Are any of them gray?’He said, ‘There are gray ones among them.’ The Prophet said, ‘From where do you think this color came to them? ‘The bedouin said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! It resulted from hereditary disposition. ‘The Prophet said, ‘And this (your child) has inherited his color from his ancestors.’ The Prophet did not allow him to deny his paternity of the child” (Bukhari).

    There is the well-known story from the seerah at a time before Muhammad’s prophethood that involved a dispute amongst the varying clans in Mecca, each who claimed the right to place the sacred Black Stone during reconstruction of the Kaaba. They brought their dispute to Muhammad and asked him to make the determination as to who should place the stone. He told them to bring him a large cloth. He laid it on the ground and placed the stone in the middle. He then instructed the chieftains of each of the four main clans to pick up one corner of the cloth. When they raised it and brought it close to the spot where it was to be placed, the Prophet took hold of the stone and put it in place. This solution was resourceful and creatively ended the dispute.

    Genuine Care and Model Relationships

    The Prophet was always acutely aware of the needs of his companions and the people. He preached love and kindness to all people. Abu Qatadah Haris Ibn Rib’i (RAA) relates that the Prophet (pbuh) said, “I stand up for prayer intending to prolong it. Then I hear the crying of a baby and I have to shorten my prayer, being apprehensive that my recitation of a long verse may burden the baby’s mother” (Bukhari).

    He always encouraged actions that strengthened the bonds of brotherhood and sisterhood. He also understood the power of being friendly, companionable, and caring. He said, “Do not ever waste your good deeds, even by meeting your brother with a frowning face.” He said also “Shaking hands removes hatred and exchanging presents enhances love and ends enmity. Anas reported Allah’s Messenger as saying, “By Him in Whose Hands is my soul, a man does not believe until he wishes for his brother what he does for himself.”
    Anas, who was his servant, said: “I served Allah’s Messenger for ten years and he never said to me, ‘uf’ [a vocalization connoting dissatisfaction or disapproval] or ‘Why did you do such-and-such a thing?’ or ‘Why did you not do such-and-such a thing?’” (Bukhari).

    The Prophet displayed his deep affection for his companions. He never would be the first one to withdraw his hand when shaking hands, and according to Jarir ibn Abdullah, the Prophet always had a smile on his face. He would take children into his arms and show them genuine affection. At all times the Prophet promoted the ideals of fellowship, encouraging the Muslims to love each other. Umar ibn al-Khattab narrated that the Prophet said, “Indeed among the servants of Allah are people who are neither prophets nor martyrs but whose place both prophets and martyrs will envy on the Day.” Those who were with him asked, “O Messenger of Allah, tell us who they are.” He said, “they are those who loved each other for the sake of Allah though there was no bond of kinship between them and no thought of gain. By Allah their faces shine with light. They are bathed in light…” (Abu Dawood).

    The Prophet was resoundingly respectful and benevolent toward the many Christian and Jewish tribes that he met with or visited in the effort to spread Islam. He invited them to embrace the religion but never engaged in coercion. Those who did not convert were encouraged by the Prophet to follow their Scripture and practice their religion. With regard to relations between the Muslims and and the non-Muslim tribes, the Prophet told his followers, “He who wrongs a Jew or a Christian will have myself as his accuser on the Day of Judgment” (Bukhari).

    Willingness to share decision-making and to be influenced by others:

    After the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah was negotiated, many of the Muslims were unhappy with the terms as they appeared to favor the Quraish. When they then failed to do as the Prophet instructed as to engaging in the rituals of umrah, the Prophet retreated to his tent and shared with his wife, Umm Salama, the disheartening situation. She advised him to go back out and begin performing the rites. The Muslims were moved by his taking action and realized that they should follow suit, which is what they did.

    Abu Hurairah (RAA) said about the Prophet, “I have never seen anyone who seeks consultation with his companions more than the Prophet.” Another incident that demonstrates the Prophet’s commitment to shura (consultation) and his willingness to consider the ideas of others and be influenced by them occurred during the Battle of Badr. One of the companions, Hubab ibn Mundhir, who was not known as an outspoken or prominent person amongst the companions, voiced an idea: “O Messenger of God! If you were not ordered by God to be positioned here, let us be positioned around the wells and close up all but one of them in order to prevent the supply of water to the enemy. You set up your camp at the side of that one well and we will encircle you.” The Prophet proceeded with this plan. (Ibn Hisham).

    It is clear from all the evidence available in the historical record that the man who revolutionized Arabia fourteen centuries ago did, indeed, operate from a motivation that was rooted in a sublime purity of heart and soul; that he embodied the traits that make for great leadership; and that he held himself impervious to the corrupting influence of power.

    It is no wonder that so many non-Muslims who have studied the life of Muhammad have perceived in him that unique confluence of pure motive, unblemished moral rectitude, and unflinching resoluteness of purpose. R. Bosworth Smith delivered a lecture in 1874 to the Royal Institution of Great Britain about Prophet Muhammad. Smith said, “…without a standing army, without a bodyguard, without a palace, without a fixed revenue, if ever any man had the right to say that he ruled by the right divine, it was Muhammad, for he had all the power without its instruments and without its supports. He cared not for the dressings of power. The simplicity of his private life was in keeping with his public life.”

    Drawing Conclusions

    Men of notable achievement so often want to be recognized and recorded in the history books for their attainments. They desire the trappings of aggrandizement and accolade. Military or political, their triumphs awaken in them the stirrings of vainglory. This was not so in the case of Muhammad, the man from the deserts of Arabia who demonstrated “scrupulous regard for pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and in his own mission,” as stated by Mahatma Gandhi. Muhammad was fulfilling his mission to be a mercy to humanity — to lead, to instruct, to guide. So the seerah is a positive challenge to Muslims to emulate his example.

    It would be a compelling testimony to the legacy of Prophet Muhammad — to his life, his manner of living, his vision for justice and peace —that Muslims be among those who are dedicated to the political awakening of humanity, that Muslims stand up and be counted in demanding leaders who are honest, sincere, and committed to social justice.

    The bequeathal of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, calls us to act. And it is the quality of that action that counts. Not anger-aroused action or vengeful action; not action based on hoping to one day have the upper hand and thus wreak havoc and suffering upon those who have done so to Palestinians or Muslims or others; not expediency placed above morality; not the penchant for total warfare in an ultimate “clash of civilizations;” not justifying for a moment a discarding of the lofty and enlightened principles put in place by the Prophet with regard to never killing in times of war women, children, the elderly and more generally, anyone who is a non-combatant. The quality of action required must adhere meticulously to the guidelines put in place by the Qur’an and the sunnah, as embodied by the Prophet in every one of his words and actions.

    We can honor the seerah of the Prophet by drawing near to Allah SWT. According to a hadith Qudsi, this is a drawing near until Allah loves the believer in such way that He, Allah, is“…his hearing with which he hears, his seeing with which he sees, his hand with which he strikes, and his foot with which he walks…” (Bukhari). We can honor the seerah of the Prophet by delving deeply within our own souls each and every day until we find that higher power of inspiration — in that nearness to Allah SWT and in the example of His Messenger.
    “If greatness of purpose, smallness of means, and astonishing results are the three criteria of a human genius, who could dare compare any great man in history with Muhammad?” -Alphonse de LaMartaine in “Historie de la Turquie,” 1854.

  • A Perspective on Free Speech and Common Sense

    As protests against the anti-Islam film spread throughout the Muslim world, information has become available about the man behind “Innocence of Muslims.” Nakoula Basseley Nakoula is a convicted criminal, twice for drug offences and more recently for financial fraud for obtaining credit cards using fake identities and then taking tens of thousands of dollars from those accounts. He also owes unpaid taxes and failed to make required payments after filing for bankruptcy twelve years ago. As to the film in question, Nakoula misled the cast and crewmembers, 79 of whom have issued a statement condemning his deceit, that they were “shocked by the drastic rewrites of the script and lies that were told to all involved.” Further, they were “deeply saddened by the tragedies that have occurred.” Nakoula has used numerous aliases over the years including the name “Sam Bacile” in connection with the film. He at first lied about his identity after chaos broke out in the Muslim world, falsely claiming that he was an Israeli
    Jew and that he had collected $5 million from Jewish donors to produce the movie. This is the man, a defrauder, who wants to warn the world about Islam, calling it a “cancer,” who claims that he has read 3000 books about Islam.

    Whether Muslims are comfortable or not with the reality, the true battle of ideas in the world today occurs through the voicing of, and dialogue about, those ideas, through the vehicle of freedom of expression

    Then there is Pamela Geller. Her group, Stop the Islamization of America (SIOA), co-founded with Robert Spencer, tried to patent their organization’s trademark. The U.S. patent office rejected their application because it “refers to Muslims in a disparaging manner,” implying that “conversion or conformity to Islam is something that needs to be stopped or caused to cease.” SIOA is running an ad campaign now that reads “In the war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel, defeat jihad.” It has been running on San Francisco busses and is set to begin showing in New York City subways. The Southern Poverty Law Center, a civil rights organization dedicated to fighting hate and bigotry, says that Geller “is the anti-Muslim movement’s most visible and flamboyant figurehead. She’s relentlessly shrill and coarse in her broad-brush denunciations of Islam and makes preposterous claims, such as that President Obama is the “love child” of Malcolm X.” The transit companies in both
    San Francisco and New York City have struggled with whether to permit the ad campaign.

    Here’s the point: whether Muslims are comfortable or not with the reality, the true battle of ideas in the world today occurs through the voicing of, and dialogue about, those ideas, through the vehicle of freedom of expression. If Nakoula and Geller and their ilk were not permitted by law to voice their vitriolic ideas, the poison would go underground and find expression in covert ways. Just as Muslims who wanted to make dawah in a nation that obstructed their right to do so would find ways to spread the word nonetheless. And social, political, or religious energies that are forced into furtive, illicit assemblies often are empowered and galvanized, taking on more stubborn resistance to being stopped or silenced.

    Balancing Free Speech Protecting Civil Society

    In the Muslim world, the protection of free speech does not extend to sacrilege or blasphemy. In the pluralistic world we live in, utterly interconnected, democracies are messy, raucous, and laborious in working their way toward a proper balance of protecting free speech and protecting civil society. To illustrate how dicey it gets, consider a case from 2010 which made its way to the Supreme Court. In Snyder v. Phelps, the family of a homosexual marine killed in Afghanistan sued the Westboro Baptist Church of Topeka, Kansas for emotional pain after church members demonstrated during their son’s funeral, carrying signs that read, “Thank God for dead soldiers”; “Fag sin = 9-11”; “Thank God for IEDs.”; “God hates fags”; and “You’re going to hell.” The court, while noting the repugnance of the Westboro group’s decision to picket at a funeral, ruled in favor of the church, noting that the church members complied with all city statutes regarding picketing, committed no violence, stayed in an area 1,000 feet away from the church where the funeral was held per police instructions, and that they were, through their demonstration, addressing an issue of public debate on public land. The court’s decision pivoted on the First Amendment guarantee that reflects “a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.” And that is because “speech concerning public affairs is more than self-expression; it is the essence of self-government.”

    One should respect another person’s religion because they should respect that person’s being, autonomy, and dignity

    The Supreme Court over the years has rejected an interpretation of First Amendment rights without limits, but the exclusions to protection are quite narrow. Speech that is intended to provoke violence or incite unlawful acts, libel and slander, obscenity (differentiated from “indecent”), and speech that conflicts with legitimate social or governmental interests such as national security — all these are considered as limiting conditions on freedom of speech. The film under discussion is clearly “libelous” in nature. The legal standard of what constitutes libelous material is that which is published in “writing or broadcast through radio, television or film, an untruth about another which will do harm to that person or his/her reputation, by tending to bring the target into ridicule, hatred, scorn or contempt of others. Libel is the written or broadcast form of defamation, distinguished from slander which is oral defamation.” However, legal protection against libel in the U.S. does not extend to the deceased. Also the film would not be considered hate speech as it does not fall into the category of such speech that is outside the protection of the First Amendment — face-to-face epithets, or “fighting words” (intending to incite or encouraging imminent unlawful violence).

    All Suppressions Side by Side on the Table

    Repugnant speech is protected, so says that ruling in Snyder v. Phelps, in order that “public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.” But what an imperfect union is this United States of America. Working out this issue of free speech, like most other progress toward fairness and equity, is two steps forward and one step back.

    Defending the Prophet (peace be upon him) in ways that contravene his teachings, his life, and his manner of dealing with and responding to offenses against God

    Consider a legislative resolution — H.R. 35: “Relative to anti-Semitism”— passed in August by the California State Assembly with support by a majority of both Republicans and Democrats. This resolution urges state educational institutions to put in place strict and aggressive measures to limit criticism of Israel on campuses, defining such criticism as “anti-Semitism.” This includes “language or behavior [that] demonizes and delegitimizes Israel;” any “speakers, films, and exhibits” that suggest that “Israel is guilty of heinous crimes against humanity such as ethnic cleansing and genocide;” describing Israel as a “racist” or “apartheid” state; promoting “student-and faculty-sponsored boycott, divestment, and sanction campaigns against Israel;” and other so-called “anti-Semitic” speech or action.

    It’s easy to see that this resolution is no buttress of the principle of “uninhibited, robust, and wide-open” debate of public issues. It is, and intends to be, an obstruction of freedom of expression. It should be vigorously protested by all people who view such suppression as a step on the path to fascistic denial of free speech. Democracy cannot survive in such conditions.

    The irony here is that there is a long-standing campaign to stifle criticism of Judaism, Jews, and Israel. The denouncing of someone as “anti-Semitic” is a tool of suppression that is widely used and extremely effective. According to all Muslims, many well-informed individuals in the U.S., most Europeans, and growing numbers of Jewish people, the historical record and ongoing policies of Israeli occupation are racist, apartheid, and in violation of international law.

    The factual evidence of that is found in the documentary record of U.N. resolutions, the annals of human rights watch groups going back decades including Israeli peace groups such as Gush Shalom, and the documentations of countless researchers and writers. Still, people with differing backgrounds and differing worldviews see the “evidence” in differing ways.

    Entitled to Respect and Deserving of Voice

    Likewise is the case of religion that people with differing backgrounds and differing worldviews see things in differing ways. Since the majority of human beings believe what they are taught as children to be “the truth” and continue to follow that religious tradition as adults (meaning that they do not see your tradition as “the truth”), we have to see the public forum of ideas as a level field where each ideology and belief system is treated as equally allowable, equally entitled to respect, and equally deserving of voice in the public discourse. That reality — that each person believes his or her religion is “the truth” — and that requisite equality (assumptive, in principle, for the sake of unfettered argument) of all ideas, viewpoints, opinions, beliefs, doctrines, traditions — means that in a pluralistic public forum suppressing criticism and opposition to Islam is no different from suppressing criticism and opposition to Israel.

    And since as the Qur’an teaches, “there is no compulsion in religion,” not only is it impermissible to coerce someone to convert to Islam, it is equally unacceptable and fundamentally irrational to demand that a person believe that Islam is the truth. If he does not believe that Islam is the truth, then he is perfectly within his right to believe anything he wants about Islam. Just as a Muslim can believe whatever he wants about Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Mormonism, or any other religion. Oh, you say, but Muslims respect Judaism and Christianity as they are the religions of “People of the Book.” So go ask a Jewish person if saying that his rabbis changed God’s word, or that the Jews are not the “chosen people” who alone and forever are favored by God, feels very respectful to him. Or ask a Christian person if asserting that Jesus is only a human being and that it’s blasphemous to call him God, that Christians are polytheists, comes across to him as respectful.

    In a pluralistic public forum where all ideas, beliefs, and traditions are equally allowable, equally entitled to respect, and equally deserving of voice, some, thankfully, become discredited. In contemporary America, ideas such as white supremacy, the inferiority of women, the perception of Native American Indians as barbaric and primitive, and many other viewpoints have been brought to disrepute in the public’s mind. And on the religious front, the People’s Temple of Jim Jones, the Hare Krishna organization, the Unification Church of Sun Myung Moon, the Ku Klux Klan, Heaven’s Gate, and the Branch Davidians – all have been revealed to be cults that rightfully garnered disgrace and public disregard.

    If there is no compulsion in religion, then an individual even has the right to hate religion or mock religion, all of them or the one of his choice. It may be considered politically incorrect, morally distasteful and offensive, ill-mannered, narrow-minded, and emotionally immature. But it is part of free speech in a pluralistic society and world community.

    Now it’s true that the Nakoula film is boorish, inflammatory, and supremely ignorant in its defamation of Islam and Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). But we’re right back, full circle, to the point of where to draw the line in allowing freedom of speech – only from the intelligent or educated, the well-intentioned and mannerly, the high-minded and judicious?

    Respecting a Person’s Autonomy & Dignity

    No one should denigrate another’s religion, not because it is “the truth” since, as already noted, there are innumerable others who believe that some other tradition is “the truth.” One should respect another person’s religion because they should respect that person’s being, autonomy, and dignity. But some human beings are more mature than others. They naturally respect any other person’s chosen belief system. They know that like his own chosen religion, it is important in their life, dear to the heart, and a means to find meaning, purpose, and solace in this difficult world.

    There are those, of course, who will mock. So how should a Muslim respond to those who mock Islam? The Qur’an says, “And, indeed, He has already revealed to you in the Book that whenever you hear people deny the truth of God’s messages and mock them, you shall avoid their company [of friendship and companionship] until they begin to talk of other things — or else, verily, you will become like them…” (Qur’an 4: 140). This verse does not tell Muslims to blame an entire nation for the mockery put forward by one person, to burn down the mocker’s house, to take to the streets in rage. In fact, another verse says, “It may be that God will grant love between you and those whom you [now] hold as enemies. For God has power; and God is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful” (Qur’an 60:7). And in another verse, “The good deed and the evil deed are not alike. Repel the evil deed with one which is better. Then the one, who between you and him was enmity, might become as your true friend” (Qur’an 61:34).

    If we want to put things in a balanced perspective and observe absolute intellectual integrity, we also have to ask if any Muslim anywhere ever mocked or denigrated the sacred persons, places, artifacts, or symbols of other religions. It needs to be phrased that way – “any Muslim anywhere ever” because the violent protests were against the film which was made by one Coptic Christian Egyptian-American who does not represent anyone but himself. There are, in fact, enough cases of a Muslim or group of Muslims denigrating another religion to put feelings of Muslim self-righteous uniquely victimized indignation where they belong — put in perspective, put in a proper and accurate view of reality so that double standards are eschewed.

    No Equivalently Offending Deed

    Some Muslims think that if non-Muslims offend or aggress against them in any sort of way, that they are sanctioned to do an equivalently offending or aggressive deed. Beside the above-cited verse about repelling the evil deed with something better, and the hadith “There should be neither harming nor reciprocating harm” (Ibn Majah and others), one can simply use a logical argument. If a non-Muslim army used rape as a weapon of war, should Muslim men rape women during wartime? Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) said, “Accustom yourselves to do good if people do good, and to not do wrong even if they commit evil.” In fact, even with regard to armed conflict, the Prophet (pbuh) put in place many guidelines including the following:

    • “Do not kill any child, any woman, or any elder or sick person.” (Sunan Abu Dawud)
    • “Do not practice treachery or mutilation. Do not uproot or burn palms or cut down fruitful trees. Do not slaughter a sheep or a cow or a camel, except for food.” (Al-Muwatta)
    • “Do not kill the monks in monasteries, and do not kill those sitting in places of worship. (Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal)
    • “Do not destroy the villages and towns, do not spoil the cultivated fields and gardens, and do not slaughter the cattle.” (Sahih Bukhari; Sunan Abu Dawud)
    • “Do not wish for an encounter with the enemy; pray to God to grant you security; but when you [are forced to] encounter them, exercise patience.” (Sahih Muslim)
    • “No one may punish with fire except the Lord of Fire.” (Sunan Abu Dawud)

    Repelling the evil deed with something better, that there should be no harm or reciprocating harm, that even during armed conflict one must adhere to ethical guidelines — these are all principles clearly and compellingly taught by Islam. There is a powerful story about Ali (may Allah be pleased with him). During a battle, he was engaged man-to-man with a combatant and had him down on the ground. Just at the moment he was about to kill him, the man spit in Ali’s face. Ali stopped with sword in midair, drew back and released the man. He felt a personal repulsion toward this individual when he was spit in his face. Killing him, in that case, would not be purely for the sake of Allah (SWT). It would have been out of the lower self, the ego. This is exquisite self-awareness and self-control!

    Self-Governance and Self-Examination

    Imams and community leaders should guide to the surpassing self-governance and the self-examination required to achieve such an elevated state of mind, heart, and soul demonstrated by Ali (RAA). They should not inflame passions or act as provocateurs of rage. Their exhortations should be to go home and purify the intention and when one is sure he or she is acting solely for the sake of Allah SWT, not out of ego with its anger, resentment, and bitterness at the vexing politics of the world, then to take some action, some judicious action, to protest the anti-Islam film. Certainly those who took to the streets in outrage over the film are regular human beings, Muslims who try to follow their religion. But in the final analysis, they did not spend enough time thinking about whether their manner of protesting, their willingness to perpetrate violence and destruction, is Islamically sanctioned and wise; or whether it’s contrary to common sense and logic, fundamentally counter-productive, and a missed opportunity.

    We have to take into account that Muslims have pent up anger toward the Israeli occupation and American foreign policy. Understandable. Emphatically so. But as we have seen in the above-cited verses and hadith, that is no excuse for un-Islamic behavior. Defending the Prophet (peace be upon him) in ways that contravene his teachings, his life, and his manner of dealing with and responding to offenses against God, His signs, the Divine message, and the Prophet himself, is nothing other than hypocritical folly. And it is completely counterproductive in that it demonstrates the exact stereotypical behaviors that feed the Islamophobic frenzy.

    The demeanor of one who believes, who is firm in belief and secure in the truth of that belief, conveys a confidence and equilibrium that is not easily thrown off center. When a Bedouin urinated in the masjid, some companions of the Prophet rushed toward him as if to punish him. The Prophet (pbuh) told them to leave him alone to finish. He then called the man over and said to him, “Urine or any kind of filth is not suitable for the masjid. They [masjids] are for the remembrance of Allah, prayer, and recitation of the Qur’an” (Saheeh Muslim). There are so many accounts of offenses and abuses toward the Prophet — placing thorny branches in his path, putting an animal’s entrails in front of his house, or trash by his door — all of which he responded to with calm, forbearance, and leniency.

    Words that Rally Against Bigotry/Blasphemy

    One last point relates to Muslims living in America. They love the guarantee of free speech when it allows them to openly practice Islam, to make dawah, to critically analyze and express Islamic viewpoints about Christianity and Judaism and other religions, and to openly condemn American foreign policy. If we love free speech, then let us use that right, and with the gift of communication and its power of persuasion, counter repugnant ideas like the one’s in Nakoula’s film with its many false and malicious statements about Islam and Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).

    Obama addressed the U.N. General Assembly on September 25th. He said, “I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban such a video. The answer is enshrined in our laws: our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech. Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense. Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs. Americans have fought and died around the globe to protect the right of all people to express their views — even views that we disagree with. We do so not because we support hateful speech, but because our Founders understood that without such protections, the capacity of each individual to express their own views, and practice their own faith, may be threatened. We do so because in a diverse society, efforts to restrict speech can become a tool to silence critics or oppress minorities. We do so because given the power of faith in our lives, and the passion that religious differences can inflame, the strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression, it is more speech — the voices of tolerance that rally against bigotry and blasphemy, and lift up the values of understanding and mutual respect.”

    The courageous people of Benghazi held up signs such as “Thugs and killers don’t represent Benghazi nor Islam”; “Islam against terrorism”; “Sorry people of America, this [is] not the behavior of our Islam and profit [Prophet].” One can imagine a similarly high-minded response that Muslims around the world could have demonstrated after the film trailer became known. This would provide a most compelling rebuttal to the egregious and recklessly false claims made about Islam and Prophet Muhammad (pubh): the image of thousands of Muslims coordinated in a worldwide demonstration, no tens of thousands, using “the strongest weapon against hateful speech” — a good and honorable word; holding high with courage and dignity, like the people of Benghazi, signs that read:

    • “God loves those who are just.” Qur’an 5:42
    • “God loves those who foster purity.” Qur’an 9:108
    • “O you who believe! Be God-conscious! And be with those who are truthful.” Qur’an 9:119
    • “Repel the evil deed with one which is better.” Qur’an 41:34
    • “Let not a people’s enmity incite you to act other than with justice. Qur’an 5:9
    • “There should be neither harming nor reciprocating harm.” – Prophet Muhammad
    • “Be upholders of justice…even against yourselves or your parents and relatives.” Qur’an 4:135
    • “Humankind! We created you from a male and female, and made you into peoples and tribes so that you might come to know one another. Qur’an 49:13
    • “The most honored of you in the sight of Allah is the one with virtue.” Qur’an 49:13

    Those are the words of wisdom that rally against bigotry and blasphemy, inspiring us to pursue the common good through engagement, with mutual understanding and respect.

    “Do you not see how God sets forth a parable? A good word like a good tree, whose root is firmly fixed, and its branches (reach) to the heavens it brings forth its fruit at all times, by the permission of its Lord. So God sets forth parables for people, in order that they may receive admonition” (Qur’an, 14:24-25).

  • Shariah in the Presidential Race

    The Republican presidential candidates, with the exception of Ron Paul, have too often resorted to messages of fear to garner votes. Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum have all voiced concerns about the threat of “extremist Islam.” Gingrich has said, “Today Washington refuses to tell the truth about the war we are fighting. According to experts, we are at war with Radical Islamism — and it is a war we are losing.” During the Republican National Security Debate, Santorum said, “We are not fighting a war on terrorism, terrorism is a tactic. We are fighting a war against radical Islam.”  Mitt Romney warns that radical Muslims would “unite the world under a single jihadist Caliphate. To do that they must collapse freedom-loving nations. Like us.”

    The current hyper focus in at least 13 states on stopping the “creeping shariah” from infiltrating the American justice system, threatening national security, and taking away American freedoms is a smoke screen for the anti-Islamic demagoguery used by the candidates and many others participating in the public discourse

    The current hyper focus in at least 13 states on stopping the “creeping shariah” from infiltrating the American justice system, threatening national security, and taking away American freedoms is a smoke screen for the anti-Islamic demagoguery used by the candidates and many others participating in the public discourse. This article will show, insha’Allah, how Islamophobia and its campaign to ban shariah interconnects with the concept of American Exceptionalism and the supremacist foreign policy it begets.

    At the core of the “creeping shariah” hysteria is the mongering of fear. When directed through an appeal to people’s prejudices, promulgating danger is useful —it markedly gets people’s attention; and it rouses them to rally behind the one who promises to protect them from the menace. In humans, any perceived threat, whether real or imagined, can set off an “unthinking emotional response” analogous to the “startle reflex” in animals. This unthinking response in humans is sometimes ratcheted up by a perverse pleasure in feeling threatened by a bogeyman of some other nation or religion or ideology. It stimulates asectarian impulse to see the world in simplistic terms that confer upon one’s own “tribe” the mantle of goodness regardless of their actions. The Prophet, peace be upon him, was asked about ‘asabiyya, the tribal loyalty that produces a fanatic blind loyalty. He replied, “It is aiding your folk in (their) oppression.” At another time he said, “One who is killed under the banner of ‘asabiyya, or raises the banner of ‘asabiyya, or aids a party on the basis of ‘asabiyya, (has died) a death of ignorance” (specifically, ignorance of Divine guidance; often referring to the ignorance represented by that of the pagan Arabs before the guidance brought by Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him).

    Civilizing Missions

    Azealous “tribal” impulse is alive and well around the globe. In the U.S., American neo-conservatives indeed see America as a “shining city on the hill,” fulfilling its destiny, as George Bush, Jr. once said, as a nation “ chosen by God and commissioned by history to be a model to the world.” Newt Gingrich declared after his South Carolina primary victory that his campaign platform was to be “American Exceptionalism,” a phrase, like “shining city on the hill,” that conveys a uniqueness about America. Unfortunately, the far right, though mostly of a religious orientation, appears to see that exceptionalism not as exceptionally devoted to ethics, integrity, and justice and a will to do good but as an unqualified and unquestioned epithet of superiority.  The ideals of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are certainly excellent standards as a national presentment, and the constitutional basis of nationhood as egalitarian — that “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights” — is a noble and self-evident threshold of enlightenment. The history of this nation, however, often contravenes these ideals and objectives with the historical record showing case after case of bigotry, exploitation, and amoral conduct. Three themes animate the belief of American Exceptionalism as with the earlier concept of Manifest Destiny. Those three themes, according to historian William E. Weeks, are the following:

    the virtueof the American people and their institutions

    the mission to spread these institutions, thereby redeeming and remaking the world in the image of the U.S.

    the destiny under God to do this work

    A supremacist view — our virtue, our civilizing mission, our divine destiny —justified the genocidal assault on the indigenous people of this land. The belief was that God Himself approved the campaign of expansionism and deculturation, if not extermination, of native Americans. Self-appointed to “Christianize and civilize the Indians,” as 18th president Ulysses S. Grant said in 1870,those who advocated this manifest destiny were following the script of earlier empire-makers: Britain carried the “white man’s burden” and France believed their imperialistic forays to be la mission civilisatrice. Even Hitler believed that he was divinely destined, saying in Mein Kampf, “Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator…”

    Cognitive Dissonance

    A cognitive dissonance — espousing that “all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights” while pursuing a campaign that characterizes a people as “savage” and denies them their most basic rights to life, liberty, let alone the pursuit of happiness —is interwoven through the fabric of  early U.S. history.  In 1779, George Washington instructed Major General John Sullivan to attack the Iroquois people, to “lay waste all the settlements around…that the country may not be merely overrun, but destroyed.”  Washington at a later date compared the American Indians with wolves: “Both being beast of prey, tho’ they differ in shape.” Such sentiments are typical of the political and military leaders of that day. Thomas Jefferson stated that any resistance on the part of the indigenous people must be met with total annihilation “…in war, they will kill some of us; we shall destroy all of them.”

    In humans, any perceived threat, whether real or imagined, can set off an “unthinking emotional response” analogous to the “startle reflex” in animals

    Keep in mind that the conflicts with the native Americans were a result of an expansionist drive, a desire for land that was already occupied by the indigenous people who were on the misfortunate receiving end of a conquering impulse. In Race and Ethnic Relations, Darryl Hall writes, “The pattern of land seizure, subjugation, assimilation, and [the subsequent] resistance to domination has been repeated with indigenous peoples in nations throughout the world.” Justifying a ruthless, vanquishing campaign necessitates a besmirching of the “enemy’s” culture, a characterizing of them as barbarous and loathsome. The demagogue’s penchant for demonizing those he wishes to exploit, control, discriminate against, or destroy has not changed over the many years.

    Those who believe in American Exceptionalism see so many evidences of the rightness of their world-view.  America’s prosperity and the political and economic march to hegemony over the course of 200 plus years prove them right, so they think. Many intellectually honest historians and commentators have suggested, however, as do writers David Kanin and Steven Meyer, that fortuitous circumstances to a great extent yielded America’s rise: “For more than a century after independence the United States benefited from a unique confluence of uninterrupted access to cheap labor (slave and immigrant), vast amounts of under populated land (especially once the natives were expelled and killed), and the Ohio-Mississippi-Missouri waterway system.”

    A Nation Like Others

    Such points, though, are lost on those who cherish the notion of American Exceptionalism, a worldview that blinds its advocates from seeing that U.S. history is a mixed bag. Winston Churchill said that “history is written by the victors,” and the advocates of exceptionalism prefer the white-washed version of reality that camouflages the dark underbelly of the American Dream —an idealist vision morphed into an octopus with countless sucker-bearing arms. A book by former New York Times foreign correspondent Stephen Kinzer, Overthrow: America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq, details how the U.S. has used its far-reaching power over the last century to stifle dissent, thwart nationalist and independence movements, and direct or participate in coup d’etats — always to advance its own political and economic agendas and often to access and/or control the natural resources of other countries. That aggressive foreign policy has interfered with, exploited, or wreaked havoc with too many nations to list here, many beyond the widely known examples of Cuba, Nicaragua, Grenada, Chile, Iran, Afghanistan, and Iraq.

    Newt Gingrich would have the U.S. continue an aggressive foreign policy and its long-standing practice of propping up ruthless dictators so long as they are pro-American and accede to American dictates. In the wake of the Arab Spring, he said, “This administration is crippling the United States and every country in the world by failing to protect those who help us.” He was speaking at a Maryland Republican Party dinner in June of 2011, and went on to say, “It’s immoral and it is destructive.” Gingrich published in 2011 A Nation Like No Other: Why American Exceptionalism Matters. In this book he writes, “America is simply the most extraordinary nation in the history. This is not a statement of nationalist hubris. It is an historic fact.”

    American Exceptionalism as Code

    David Stockman, himself a Republican who at age 34 was Ronald Reagan’s budget director, said about ultra-conservative “exceptionalism”:  “The word is neocon-speak, code for an aggressive foreign policy. It’s for more Bush, with even more aggressive intent.  It’s about beating the war drums in Iran.  It’s about keeping the military establishment—which is vastly greater than we need—fully in place. That’s what exceptionalism is about. It’s not about our economic problems or jobs or the fact that Main Street is falling behind or that we’ve done nothing about Wall Street or that we have a Fed out of control or all the other issues that we could mention. That is code for an aggressive foreign policy that I think is the most dangerous thing we could do at the moment.”

    Ron Paul concurs. In January of this year Paul told a crowd in South Carolina, “There’s a move on in our country to excuse our intervention overseas, and they call it American exceptionalism. They distort this view, of course.” Paul went on, “They say that America is exceptional, they know what is right, and they have this moral obligation to force it down the throats of other people, and if they don’t take it, we’re supposed to invade them and make them do exactly as we say.” Romney, less hawkish than Gingrich or Santorum, nonetheless aligns himself with those who subscribe to an aggressive foreign policy and perhaps even the “moral obligation to force [what America sees as right] down the throats of other people.” Giving a foreign policy address at the Citadel, a military college in South Carolina, he said, “I will not surrender America’s role in the world. This is very simple: If you do not want America to be the strongest nation on Earth, I am not your President.”  He went on to say, “This century must be an American Century. In an American Century, America has the strongest economy and the strongest military in the world. In an American Century, America leads the free world and the free world leads the entire world.” And why is America at the helm? His answer:“America is exceptional.”

    La mission civilisatrice, Manifest Destiny, American Exceptionalism, an American Century…all the same —“our virtue, our civilizing mission, our divine destiny”— hubristic impulse. There is a wise saying: “Those with true virtue do not flaunt themselves and so their upstanding character is clearly seen by all; nor do they boast about themselves and so their goodness endures and speaks to the ages.” As Americans, we have to challenge ourselves and this country to be more self-examining so as to correct errors and wrongdoings and continually stretch ourselves and our nation toward greater ethics, integrity, and justice, the same as every other nation should challenge itself to do. In fact, as the dominant power in the world today, the primary challenge lays on our shoulders so that we do not continue strong-arming our way across the globe;  rather we must commit to building genuine character, individually and as a nation, and spread, thereby, a goodness purified of hypocrisy and subterfuge. That would seem like the wise, just, egalitarian approach to living in a world utterly connected and interdependent.

    Not so fast, says Romney, the presumed frontrunner in the Republican primary contest. “We have a president right now who thinks America’s just another nation,” he said during one of the primary debates. “America is an exceptional nation. We have a president who thinks that the way to conduct foreign policy is through his personal effects on other people. I believe the way to conduct foreign policy is with American strength.” But as John Milton, 17th century writer and poet, said, “What is strength without a double share of wisdom?” In fact, any nation throughout history which has brandished its military might with arrogance and inhumaneness, devoid of the wisdom yielded up by morality and reason, has bred turmoil and rancor in its wake, and ultimately brought about its own demise.

    Islamophobia and Exceptionalism

    American Exceptionalism evokes prideful feelings, that “Americans were chosen by God,”  writes Julia E. Sweig, Nelson and David Rockefeller Senior Fellow for Latin America Studies. She continues, that “…their special experiment at home [is] morally superior to other countries and thus theologically required to be a light unto the nations. Whether manifest destiny in the 19th century, [Bill Clinton’s] indispensability in the 20th century, or preemptive attacks in the 21st, Democrats and Republicans largely concur on the upside of American exceptionalism. It is the rare public official with the courage to suggest that the double standards and disregard for international law that frequently define American foreign policy might in fact hurt national interests.”

    Such nuanced understanding, that there is a downside to American Exceptionalism and its hegemonic foreign policy, is ungrasped by the far right. After 9/11 then-president George Bush said in an address to Congress on September 20, 2001, “They hate our freedoms: our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other.” However, according to a 2004 report by the Defense Science Board Task Force, an advisory committee to the Secretary of Defense:

    “Muslims do not ‘hate our freedom,’ but rather, they hate our policies. The overwhelming majority voice their objections to what they see as one-sided support in favor of Israel and against Palestinian rights, and the longstanding, even increasing support for what Muslims collectively see as tyrannies, most notably Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Pakistan, and the Gulf states.”

    “Furthermore, in the eyes of Muslims, American occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq has not led to democracy there, but only more chaos and suffering. U.S. actions appear in contrast to be motivated by ulterior motives, and deliberately controlled in order to best serve American national interests at the expense of truly Muslim self-determination.”

    Yet, some on the far right see any back-step from the brinkmanship of aggressive foreign policy as anti-American, as hatred for Western civilization. Referring to the “American left,” Santorum said: “They hate Western civilization at the core. That’s the problem.” Santorum also sees American involvement in the Middle East as part of our “core American values.” In fact the “values” of American Exceptionalism are on full display when Noam Chomsky points out that, “In internal discussions in 1958, which have since been declassified, President Eisenhower spoke about a campaign of hatred against us in the Arab world. Not from the governments, but from the people. The National Security Council’s top planning body produced a memorandum – you can pick it up on the web now – in which they explained it. They said that the perception in the Arab world is that the United States blocks democracy and development and supports harsh dictators and we do it to get control over their oil. The memorandum said, this perception is more or less accurate, and that’s basically what we ought to be doing.”

    So the “values” of American Exceptionalism include a frank recognition of why aggressive American foreign policy provokes an anti-American backlash but, nonetheless, such rancor toward the United States is seen as an inevitable and acceptable adverse side effect. Mark Levine, in Why They Don’t Hate Us: Lifting the Veil on the Axis of Evil, writes, “Certainly, the average Muslim is better informed about the United States or Europe than the average American is about Arab/Muslim, or even European, cultures and societies. To the extent that Muslims are critical of the United States or the larger West (which today would more appropriately be called the ‘Global North’), their reasons are as often as not quite rational.” Further, he writes in a review of another book, Islamophobia: The Ideological Campaign Against Muslims, by Stephen Sheehi, “…a deep-seated psychological fear of Islam and Muslims has been produced and circulated to enable not merely war, but a globalized militarism of historically unprecedented scale that most Americans have come to take for granted as necessary and inevitable in the post-September 11 world.”

    Phyllis Bennis, director of the New Internationalism Project at the Institute for Policy Studies, commented that Islamophobic rhetoric is an important tool of incitement for hawkish politicians as was the “reds-under-your-bed” propaganda during the Cold War. But, she says, “With the fall of communism, we didn’t have the Soviet Union to kick around anymore. But then came the idea of Islam as an enemy. That’s powerful. ”Notice how a version of “reds under your bed” is used anew to monger fear: Rep. Allen West a Republican from Florida campaigned on a promise to oppose religious diversity. He has said that he hopes Congress will focus on the “infiltration of the Sharia practice into all of our operating systems in our country as well as across Western civilization.” Banning shariah must be a part of the “national security strategy” and that focus must include “security systems, our political systems, economic systems, our cultural and educational systems, so that we can thwart this.”

    The Poisonous Atmosphere – and How to Clear the Air

    The current campaign of Islamophobia and shariah-bashing thus stand on a number of bases:

    the concept of American
    Exceptionalism

    the aggressive foreign policy that accompanies that worldview

    the political benefit of having a bogeyman, someone to blame, especially when there is an economic downturn and people feel insecure and fearful; Muslims currently serve as the bogeyman

    the election of a black president which threatens the worldview of the less than broad-minded of the white working class and causes them to feel loss of socioeconomic primacy and thus become more susceptible to mongers of hatred and fear

    the propagandized perception of Islam and all Muslims as radical, with a propensity for terroristic activity to achieve end goals of world dominance

    subscribing to a set of double standards: all nations must abide by international law but the superpower will ignore such law as and when it pleases

    refusal to acknowledge the historically documented awareness of the power elite of how a hegemonic foreign policy legitimately and inevitably breeds resentment and hatred

    the concern that President Obama has (tenuously, at times) embraced a foreign policy approach that relinquishes some of the most hawkish and imperialist aspects of American Exceptionalism

    There are a number of ways to throw light on the destructiveness and intellectual dishonesty of the current campaign to foment Islamophobia and the fear of shariah:

    Point out that all evidence indicates that shariah as a threat is a non-issue. According to a 2011 report by the ACLU, Nothing to Fear: Debunking the Mythical ‘Sharia Threat’ to Our Judicial System, “There is no evidence that Islamic law is encroaching on our courts. On the contrary, the court cases cited by anti-Muslim groups as purportedly illustrative of this problem actually show the opposite: Courts treat lawsuits that are brought by Muslims or that address the Islamic faith in the same way that they deal with similar claims brought by people of other faiths or that involve no religion at all. These cases also show that sufficient protections already exist in our legal system to ensure that courts do not become impermissibly entangled with religion or improperly consider, defer to, or apply religious law where it would violate basic principles of U.S. or state public policy.”

    Point out that Jewish Halakah law and Catholic Canon law are both faith-based laws that exist side by side with civil law. Beth Din is a mediation and arbitration service that uses Halakah law and “conducts its proceedings in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of secular arbitration law, so that the rulings of the Beth Din are legally binding and enforceable in the secular court system.” When there are differences between Halakah law and constitutional law, rulings by the religious court would be overridden. Canon law, according to Dr. Edward Peters, a lay canon lawyer, “the oldest continuously functioning legal system in the western world, is the internal legal system of the Catholic Church. It affects virtually every aspect of the faith life of some one billion Catholic Christians throughout the world.”  No one has raised a voice about “creeping Halakah” or “creeping Canon law.” Shariah law must be seen in the same way as Halakah or Canon law.

    Point out that we would hope and expect that American people not be judged by the beliefs and actions of American extremists such as the Ku Klux Klan, the Patriot movement, or any of the other myriad of hate groups within the U.S. with propensity to violence. According to the The Southern Poverty Law Center there are 1,002 known hate groups operating across the country, including neo-Nazis, Ku Klux Klan, white nationalists, neo-Confederates, racist skinheads, black separatists, Christian identity groups, border vigilantes, and others. Since the year 2000, the number has increased by over 50 percent. Yet, we would be averse to other nations judging Americans by the many extremist groups in our midst. Likewise, Muslims should not be judged by the extremists in their midst nor characterized en masse.

    Point out that we must apply a single standard of morality to ourselves as we do to others, including utilizing and applying a single definition of terrorism; the official U.S. definition is: “[An] act of terrorism, means any activity that  involves a violent act or an act dangerous to human life that is a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State; and appears to be intended  to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or to affect the conduct of a government by assassination or kidnapping.” Any person, group, or nation that is guilty of such action, must acknowledge that and cease and desist from such activity, and be held accountable. All nations must denounce and eschew double standards when it comes to the support and abiding of international law.

    Point out that the campaign to ban shariah has unintended consequences. Tim Murphy, who writes for Mother Jones, says with regard to anti-shariah legislation, “According to Roger Baron, a professor of family law at the University of South Dakota, the amendment’s prohibition on foreign laws would remove the state from a number of agreements concerning child custody and child abduction. Because those agreements hinge on reciprocity, ‘foreign countries will not enforce our custody decrees…’”

    No Conceit or Condescension

    Most importantly, we must make sure that we do not commit the same errors committed by those who ascribe to American Exceptionalism. At the core of  this “exceptionalism” is the belief in superiority. This gives rise to arrogance and overweening pride. Jamal Badawi comments about spiritual arrogance: “As a response to some of the people who used to talk in pride about their ancestors (when people talked about their relation to Abraham and other Israelite prophets) the Qur’an says in (2:141) ‘That was a people that hath passed away. They shall reap the fruit of what they did, and ye of what ye do!’  In the time of the Prophet (pbuh) some of the Israelites used to boast that if they were going to go to the fire, it will only touch them for a few days, in (2:80) ‘And they say: The Fire shall not touch us but for a few numbered days; Say: Have ye taken a promise from Allah, for He never breaks His promise? Or is it that ye say of Allah what ye do not know?’  Addressing the Muslims themselves in order to avoid the attitude of spiritual arrogance, the Qur’an says in (4:123) ‘Not your desires, nor those of the People of the Book (can prevail): whoever works evil, will be requited accordingly. Nor will he find, besides Allah, any protector or helper.’”

    Certainly a Muslim should feel a sense of honor in being Muslim. However, this very easily can slink its way to a sense of superiority and arrogance. Narrated Abdullah bin Masood: “The Prophet of Allah said: ‘He who has in his heart the weight of a mustard seed of pride and arrogance shall not enter Paradise.’  A person (among those listening) said: ‘Verily a person loves that his dress should be fine, and his shoes should be fine.’ He (the Prophet) remarked: ‘Verily, Allah is beautiful and He loves beauty. Pride is disdaining the truth (out of self-conceit) and contempt (or condescension) toward the people’” (Sahih Muslim). Islamically, the only true honor is taqwa (God-consciousness, piety, virtue). Islam does not sanction any sense of superiority to others — whether nations, ethnicities, races, or religions, or persons. Being Muslim must be viewed as a blessing and a responsibility, not a merit and privilege. Yet there are some who think themselves superior because they are Muslim. Pointing to the actual meaning of “muslim” as “one who surrenders to God” — a personal characterizing rather than a nominal title —Abul A’la Maududi writes, “Islam, in fact, is a descriptive title. Whoever possesses the qualities contained within this description, regardless of his race, community, country, or family, is a Muslim. According to the Qur’an (the holy Book of the Muslims) among every society and in all ages there have been good and righteous people who possessed these qualities – and all of them were and are Muslims.”

    In fact, this gets to the crux of the problem with belief in American Exceptionalism. If an individual of any group or persuasion went around announcing his superiority, boasting of his own virtue, claiming that it was his mission and his divine destiny to civilize others, making his self-proclaimed “exceptionalism” his calling card, he would be discredited and rejected without hesitation. But if he was, in fact, virtuous but humbly went about his life’s work spreading goodness wherever he went, he would be perceived as a genuinely exceptional person. It’s worth repeating: “Those with true virtue do not flaunt themselves and so their character is clearly seen by all; nor do they boast about themselves and so their goodness endures and speaks to the ages.”This just as aptly applies to nations. In the last sermon of the Prophet, peace be upon him, he said, “All mankind is from Adam and Eve; an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over a black nor a black has any superiority over a white, except by piety and good action.”

    We pray that Allah SWT guide us in our efforts to offset the campaign to besmirch Islam and shariah. Let us be of those who offer an alternate vision to pretentious exceptionalism, espousing for America an egalitarian approach to existence and engagement in the world, firmly planted on a foundation of ethics, justice, and integrity. We would hope that Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich spend less time boasting of America’s greatness and more time actualizing the precepts of their religion, plain for all to see in their scripture. Jesus, peace be upon him, is reported to have said to his followers during the famous Sermon on the Mount: “A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works…”

    We can join with those many fellow Americans who believe that the U.S. can be a genuine force for good in the world, and will fulfill its potential when the majority of citizens demand ethics and integrity from the politicians. We must elect those who renounce the power elite who seek to act in their own political/military/corporate interests. We must elect those who realize that they are public servants who can only serve the common good by being honest, moral, self-examining, humble, and genuinely wishing for one’s human brothers and sisters all over the world what one wishes for oneself. Then the shining city on the hill will not be a showcase for boasting and bedazzlement, but a beacon of lucid and inspiring light for all who journey on the path to goodness.

    “And turn not thy cheek away from people in pride, and walk not haughtily on earth: for, behold, God does not love anyone who, out of self-conceit, acts in a boastful manner” (Qur’an 31:18).

  • Beautifying the Heart with Sincerity

    Beautifying the Heart with Sincerity

    In The Alchemy of Happiness, Imam Al-Ghazali writes: ”His five senses are like five doors opening on the external world; but, more wonderful than this, his heart has a window which opens on the unseen world of spirits. In the state of sleep, when the avenues of the senses are closed, this window is opened and man receives impressions from the unseen world and sometimes foreshadowings of the future. His heart is then like a mirror which reflects what is pictured in the Tablet of Fate. But, even in sleep, thoughts of worldly things dull this mirror, so, that the impressions it receives are not clear. After death, however, such thoughts vanish and things are seen in their naked reality, and the saying in the Qur’an is fulfilled: ‘We have lifted from you your veil, and keen is your sight today.’ ”

    In that infinitude lays the richness we yearn for, the plenitude that is never narrowed or diminished or depreciated as it is the open-ended realm of God-consciousness

    The worldly things that dull the mirror of the heart are most often associated with pride and self-aggrandizement —looking for worldly reward; that is, seeking praise from others or desiring wealth and material acquisition. When we desire to aggrandize the self, we feed the ego. Yet, the ego can never be satisfied. Ibn ‘Abbas reported that the Prophet, peace be upon him, said, “If the son of Adam possessed a valley full of gold, he would want to have two valleys; yet his mouth will only be filled by earth. Allah turns towards those who turn in repentance” (agreed upon). A valley full of gold won’t do it, yet we often try to find an abiding fulfillment with some fleeting thing such as food or drink or entertainment or drugs or socializing or fame.But we cannot get our fill; we cannot find enduring satisfaction in things that will perish. As Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim said, “O people who take pleasure in a life that will vanish— falling in love with a fading shadow is sheer foolishness.”

    We can find satisfaction only by struggling to overcome the ego so that we pursue things of genuine value and lasting significance. Imam Abul Qasim Al-Qushayri, may Allah be pleased with him, said, “The spiritual warrior is he who breaks an idol; and the idol of each person is his [own] ego.” With efforts to overcome the ego, we are striving to attain a pure, unadulterated quality of heart — sincerity.

    Seeing Things for What They Truly Are

    The Qur’an says, “Truly We distinguished them with a distinct quality—remembrance of the Abode” (Qur’an 38:46).In this verse, the word “distinguished” and the phrase “distinct quality” both come from the same root as ikhlas which means “sincerity.” The root is “kha-la-sa”which holds the meaning “to be pure and unadulterated.” The more we rid the heart of egotistic tendencies and impulses, the more we attain to a pure, unadulterated quality of heart – a sincere heart. And the verse tells us that with sincerity we maintain remembrance of the Abode. This is the abode of reality – where all things are seen for what they truly are. While the veils that shroud the heart are only fully removed on the Day of Sorting Out, we can make great efforts to “see things for what they truly are,” as Imam Al-Ghazali says in the above-cited passage, “in their naked reality,” as the sight becomes increasingly keen.

    The sincere soul finds its gratification in recognition and honoring by the One who guides to things of true plenitude

    Removing the veils of ego — anger, envy, pride, greed and other lower states — we more and more grasp the principle of cause and effect; we understand in a deeper way what matters, what has genuine value and what has priority; we make more productive and responsible decisions; we respond rather than react; we gravitate to people and experiences which nourish and positively challenge us; we avoid or remove ourselves from those persons or situations which potentially can harm or debase us; we refrain from doing foolish, counterproductive, or self-destructive things. With this spiritual insight, we feel greater joy in seeing things for what they are rather than skewing them to suit the ego. We come to love the challenge of turning the self inside out, so to speak, to ferret out any defect. And we never lose sight of being kind and patient with ourselves no matter how strictly we strive for discipline and rigor in our efforts to transform the self and purify the heart of everything egotistic and false.

    No False Pretense, No Manipulation

    The dictionary defines the English word “sincerity” as being free of deceit, hypocrisy, or falseness. Without sincerity, we try to fool ourselves and others about who we are, wanting to appear more than we are: more accomplished, more wealthy, more pious, more knowledgeable, never-ending ego aggrandizement, just like wanting more valleys of gold. We fear being seen for what we really are (imperfect). Or we love to be perceived as something we are not (perfect). Instances of deceit, hypocrisy, or falseness can be very subtle, especially to our own selves! There is a long hadeeth Qudsi (a hadeeth which is divinely inspired but in the Prophet’s own words) which gives three examples of individuals who think they have lived their lives righteously, but whose “piety” is superficial and driven by the ego. They have deluded themselves and in each case they are consigned to the Fire. The third example in the hadeeth is

    “…a man who Allah had made abundantly rich and granted him every kind of wealth. He will be brought and Allah will make known to him His favors and he (the man) will acknowledge them. Allah will say, ‘And what did you do about them.’ The man will say, ‘I spent money in every cause in which You wished that it should be spent.’ Allah will say, ‘You are lying. You did so to be described as a generous fellow.’ Orders will be given against him and he will be dragged face downward and thrown into Hell”(Muslim).

    We can find satisfaction only by struggling to overcome the ego so that we pursue things of genuine value and lasting significance

    The irony is that every person wants to appear sincere. But how many dedicate their lives to purifying the heart and presenting themselves exactly as they are, with no false pretense and no motive to manipulate or fool? Genuine sincerity is possible when we comprehend that being sincere in one’s deen, living for the sake of Allah SWT, encompasses living for the sake of goodness, honesty, fairness, trustworthiness, compassion, and every other virtue. The virtues become more delectable than food or drink or valleys of gold.

    Sincerity comes from a heart so inclined to virtue and pure innocence, and thus can touch the hearts of others. Sincerity is believable; it is credible; a friend or spouse can feel it’s truthfulness and it’s power. Without sincerity, there is only pretense and foolery. Ultimately, insincerity is a betrayal of human potential and destiny — bringing us and others disappointment, trouble, and grief. Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim said, “Deeds without sincerity are like a traveler who carries in his water-jug dirt. The carrying of it burdens him and it brings no benefit.”

    If we want to fill our hearts with sincerity, we must empty them of dishonesty, untrustworthiness, carelessness, deceit — all manner of impurity. This is done step-by-step as a lifelong dedication, examining and reflecting on our beliefs, attitudes, motives, words, and actions. As we correct our errors, hone our habits, and achieve our goals, faith is fortified and the elegance of sincerity is more and more manifest. The water-jug has been cleansed of all dirt and what remains is crystal clear, revitalizing water by which our own and others’ thirst for human maturity and magnanimity — a fully developed generosity and nobility of character — has been satisfied.

    Fed by Humbleness, Energized by Taqwa

    Humbleness feeds sincerity like water and nutrients from the earth being drawn up by roots of plants to feed their growth. A note of caution is to not confuse humbleness with a belittling or abasing of the self. A young man sought counseling for a social anxiety issue which made him feel self-conscious even walking down the street, overwhelmed at any social event with the feeling that others were critically watching him and could see his awkwardness. He shared with the counselor how he never felt authentic and when he tried to just be himself, it felt so unnatural. This young man lacked self-esteem, confidence, and feelings of worthiness. This is not what is meant by humbleness. Muslims are to be a “community of the middle way,” as Allah SWT says, “Thus We have made you ummat-al-wasat (a community of the middle way) that you may be a witness over all nations…” (Qur’an 2:143). The middle way for the positioning of self is humbleness, a moderate place between the two extremes of self-abasement and self-glorifying.

    The etymology of the word “humble” is “on the ground,” from humus” earth.” That is exactly what human beings are, “of the earth” — “Now, indeed, We did create man out of the essence of clay” (Qur’an 23:12). In fact, the human body is made up of the elements of the earth’s crust, with 99 percent of its mass being composed of oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, calcium, and phosphorus. Until rather recently in history, people walked barefoot and slept on the ground. We are bioelectric beings whose health is positively affected by direct interaction with earth and nature. A natural therapy that is gaining in popularity is called “grounding” or “earthing” which involves reconnecting to the earth to restore and maintain the body’s proper electrical balance. This therapy is simply the practice at times of walking barefoot or sitting or lying on the ground, touching the earth from which we were created. We live in insulated buildings, wear shoes with thick rubber or plastic soles, and seldom touch the soil of the earth we live on. “Grounding” postulates that maintaining a connection to the earth has a healing power and can help to diminish inflammation, pain, fatigue, stress and other modern day stress-related ailments. We mention this as it establishes another connection to the root meaning of the word “humble” and adds an additional layer of noteworthiness to the idea that we must remain “grounded”, “down-to-earth,” humble in our attitudes and posturing in daily life.

    And when we stay grounded, maintaining awareness of not only our origin, but also our status — servants of Allah SWT entrusted with vicegerency of the earth — we can then reach for the highest good and fulfill our destiny. Love and fear of God and virtuousness, as generators of God-consciousness (all aspects of taqwa), supply an enlightening and ardent energy to sincerity. If we metaphorically describe sincerity as a tree, then humbleness provides the nutrients to be drawn up by roots in the earth to feed the tree; and we can describe taqwa as the life-giving warmth and energy of the sun drawing the tree heavenward. Taqwa connects the soul to the divine presence, pulling the soul’s inclinations toward higher-minded awareness and uprightness of character, toward realization of its destiny — attaining residence in the eternal abode, in nearness to God.

    Sincerity draws nutrients from below, from the earth, from humbleness; and draws warmth and energy from above by taqwa, God-consciousness, and remembrance of our highest potential destiny.

    Sincerity “Without Wax”

    An integral part of realizing that noble destiny is coming to terms with our weaknesses. If we are seeking to be sincere, we will not try to hide (especially from ourselves) our flaws and imperfections. Imam Shafa’i, may Allah be pleased with him, said, “Whoever bears testimony to his weaknesses, will be granted uprightness.” In fact, the more a person recognizes his or her own shortcomings, the more he will acknowledge his limitations as a human being, and this humbles and softens the heart. This is the way of sincerity. Our imperfections are opportunities to more carefully sculpt our habits, design our attitudes, and choose our thoughts and actions. Rather than pretending our imperfections don’t exist, we work on them and improve ourselves.

    One popular explanation about the origin of the English word “sincere” is that it is derived from the Latin,sine = without, cera = wax. “Without wax” refers to the practice of dishonest sculptors in Rome who would try to cover up any mistakes they made while chipping away at white Carrera marble. If one chipped against the grain of the stone, he could create a crack. Even a hairline crack would be considered disastrous. So the dishonest sculptor would skillfully apply a soft, white wax to fill the crack and make the sculpture appear flawless, without defect. The people came to know about this dishonest practice and those who commissioned a marble sculpture would meticulously examine the piece before paying for it, accepting only work of the highest excellence — “sine cere,” that is, without wax.

    Likewise with our flaws — the cracks in our character — we can fill them with wax and present ourselves with dishonesty, pretentiousness, and insincerity. Or we can allow the cracks to be what they are – testimony to our being human and imperfect; and opportunity to work on ourselves, to recognize our shortcomings, “to bear testimony to our weaknesses,” to be humble yet striving for excellence.

    Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim said: “Satan rejoiced when Adam was ousted from Paradise, but he did not know that when a diver sinks into the sea, he collects pearls and then rises again. ”Ibn Al-Qayyim further explains this idea of falling into the depths of our imperfections as a means of attaining good: “One of the salaf (pious predecessors) said: ‘Indeed a servant commits a sin by which he enters Paradise; and another does a good deed by which he enters the Fire. ’It was asked: How is that? He replied: ‘The one who committed the sin, constantly thinks about it; which causes him to fear it, regret it, weep over it and feel ashamed in front of his Lord—the Most High—due to it. He stands before God, broken-hearted and with his head lowered in humility. So this sin is more beneficial to him than doing many acts of obedience, since it caused him to have humbleness—which leads to the servant’s happiness and success—to the extent that this sin becomes the cause for him entering Paradise. As for the doer of good, he does not consider this good a favor from his Lord upon him. Rather, he becomes arrogant and amazed with himself, saying: I have achieved such-and-such, and such-and-such. So this further increases him in self-adulation, pride and arrogance—such that this becomes the cause for his destruction.’

    Ceasing Desire for the Praise from Others

    So what does it mean to turn away from self-adulation, pride, and arrogance; to cease desiring the praisings of human beings? Don’t we all wish for recognition when we have done a good job or accomplished something? …or written an inspiring poem or designed a technology that makes life easier? …or campaigned to pass legislation that improves society? …or helped to found a non-profit organization that feeds the needy? Remember the young man mentioned above who lacked any sense of self-worthiness? Allah SWT does not ordain for us that lacking. He does not ask us to annihilate the self and its needs, but to elevate the covetous self to an aspiring self. God then ordains for us an abundance, a richness of self/soul: the Prophet, peace be upon him, said: “Richness does not lie in the abundance of goods; richness is the richness of the soul” (Sahih Muslim). The sincere soul finds its gratification in recognition and honoring by the One who guides to things of true plenitude. But how do we get from here to there? How do we cease desiring the praisings of human beings?

    When we stand in the balanced, moderate place of humbleness – grounded and knowing we are “of the earth” – and striving to attain and increase our taqwa, we are positioned to submerge the soul in the greatness of Allah SWT. By renouncing the ego and nourishing instead the heart, we can do a good job or accomplish something worthwhile or inspire others or innovate something that increases the general well-being or support charitable activities; and all the while the focus is on the goodness achieved and the pleasing of Allah SWT rather than on aggrandizing of the self. This is the open secret: the praise received, whether intended by the praiser or not, can be transmuted by the sincere heart into a declaration of “alhamdulillah,” all praise is due to Allah. It passes through the sincere heart like through a permeable membrane, to enter a boundless dimension.In that infinitude lays the richness we yearn for, the plenitude that is never narrowed or diminished or depreciated as it is the open-ended realm of God-consciousness rather than the confinement of self-centeredness.

    With God-consciousness, we comprehend endless bounties — the expanse of earth with its lush pastures, majestic mountains, and vast deserts; the profound caring of kinship and marriage and friendship; the penetrating capacities of reason, intuition, and knowing; the marvels of language and communication; the passionate depths discovered in striving for meaning and purpose; the rightfulness provided by discernment and ethical choice; the miracle of consciousness, free will, creativity, and joy; the elegance of yearning and the grace of achievement — everything we need to survive, to know and understand, to attain fulfillment.

    The egotist is blind to such bounties. He finds motivation and satisfaction in his self-centeredness, in being seen and lauded as hardworking or energetic or accomplished because flattery feeds his ego and puffs up his pride. Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, said: “The one who shows off has three characteristics: he is lazy when by himself, he is lively and energetic when with others; and he increases in his actions when he is praised and decreases in them when he is criticized.”The vitality of the sincere heart, contrariwise, is nourished from a fountainhead of bestowing, the Source of All-Goodness that guides away from puffery and all things insubstantial. The heart is like a treasure house and the show-off fills it with flattery and exaggerated opinion of self. The sincere one fills the treasure house of the heart with the pearls he collected upon diving into the depths. He took up diving because he knew that deep within each of his actions was an intention, and within that intention he would find either glory to self or glory to God. When he chose glory to God, he collected a pearl of spiritual wisdom, he humbled the self, nourished his sincerity, enriched his soul, and cultivated his God-consciousness. Then, in the midst of the collected pearls, the humble one realizes that within the heart is the greatest treasure of all— knowing Allah SWT. In the hadith Qudsi known as the “Hidden Treasure,” Prophet David (pbuh) asked Allah about the purpose of the creation. Allah reveals this purpose, saying, “I was a hidden treasure and I loved to be known; I created the creation in order to be known.”

    Sincerity: To Really Mean It!

    To be sincere means being earnest, genuine, and real; “to really mean it” when we say or do or intend something. In the hadeeth Qudsi cited above about those whose “piety” is superficial and driven by ego, the three individuals mentioned in the full hadeeth are a “brave warrior,” a “scholar,” and a “generous fellow. ”Each one had defect in his intention. Their life activities might have looked like authentic bravery or scholarship or generosity. For sure, each attempted to appear (even to himself) sincere in his actions. But at the base was self-glory rather than glory for truth, justice, benevolence, and all things good which originate from and return to Allah SWT. When we reconcile two people who have a conflict, is it because we seek always to promote understanding, tolerance, and good will or because we find satisfaction in being called a peacemaker? When I make an intention to stop bickering with my spouse — do I really mean it? When I think that I have to try being more patient with my kids — do I really mean it? When I say that I want to improve my job performance — do I really mean it? Or are these words and sentiments that make me feel good for a moment and then I choose to indulge in argumentativeness or impatience or carelessness because they are habitually familiar and easier, more seemingly comfortable to me, than tolerance and patience and conscientiousness? How do I know if I really “mean it”? If I follow through, practice again and again behaving in the better manner, resolve to try another time when I fall or fail or give in to frustration. If I dedicate myself to the transformation of self as a lifelong endeavor — then I really “mean it,” with the help and the grace of Allah SWT.

    Aligning One’s Life with What Endures

    Acting, striving, setting goals, and accomplishing for the sake of Allah SWT is a choice to align one’s life with that which endures and brings ultimate contentment and gratification. The sincere heart yields itself to this higher good, no longer desiring a gratification of the lower self. One of the salaf said: “Whoever had a single instance in his lifetime which was purely and sincerely for the sake of Allah, the Exalted, will be saved, and this is due to the greatness of sincerity. ”The sincere heart yearns for the boundless joy of eternal greatness and ultimate contentment. That only results from striving for excellence, purifying the heart of everything false, base, and selfish so that the eye keeps sight of the final abode, the place of eternity. The sincere heart finds strength and inspiration and healing in this way. The beauty that we behold, then, is a beauty that endures beyond the aging and decay of created things. Imam Ibn al-Qayyim said, “Allah loves from His servant that he beautifies his tongue with the truth and his heart with sincerity and love, turning with repentance and reliance upon Allah.”

    We can begin to clean the mirror of the heart to “reflect what is pictured in the Tablet of Fate.” For is it not the Tablet of Fate that tells the true story of our lives? What we did, what we intended, what lay deep within our hearts. How fervent was our devotion, how abiding our faith? How true was our trust in Allah SWT and His promise? If we knew the content of our soul’s narrative in its naked truth and could compare that to the soul’s elevated and distinguished potential, would we not do everything in our power to beautify our hearts with sincerity?

    Some steps we can take are as follows:

    We can keep in mind the fleeting nature of this world and work on freeing ourselves from attachment to its base allurements

    We can stop trying to cover up our imperfections so as to appear better than we are; instead, we can work on those shortcomings and aim for excellence

    We can stay grounded, maintaining awareness of our origin and status — humble servants of Allah SWT entrusted with vicegerency of the earth — we can then reach for the highest good and fulfill our destiny which is a noble destiny

    When someone praises us, we can feel great about any goodness that was achieved, focusing on the aggrandizing of good rather than of the self, and then say alhamdulillah

    Step-by-step, with lifelong dedication, we can strive to purify the heart of anger, envy, pride, greed and other impurities

    We can realize that the true reward cannot come from human beings or from this world, but from the One who gives the truest reward

    We can recognize our imperfections, our shortcomings and weaknesses, our propensity to sin, feeling sorrow for any wrongdoing and also hoping for redemption; this moves us to turn to Allah and ask for forgiveness and then follow that up with correcting of intention, attitude, thought, feeling, speech, action, or habit — whatever needs correcting.

    We have a choice: take ultimate pleasure in a life that will vanish like a fading shadow; or we can strive to be of “…those who repent and correct (their lives), and hold fast unto God, and grow sincere in their faith in God alone: for these shall be one with the believers — and in time God will grant to all believers a mighty reward” (Qur’an 4:146).

    We can dedicate our lives to making our hearts sincere so that we rejoice when Allah SWT says, “We have lifted from you your veil, and keen is your sight today” (Qur’an 50:22).