بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Tag: Interfaith

  • The Role of Interfaith Dialogue

    The Role of Interfaith Dialogue

    Prophet Muhammad, 1447 years ago, announced his Islamic mission and since then opposition has been pursued by those whose beliefs and ways of life were/are challenged by the deen of Islam. Followers of previous faith traditions never accepted Muhammad as a prophet of God. During his lifetime he was called a liar, magician, poet, and lunatic. Now they call him a pedophile, a warmonger, and a terrorist. Islam, from its beginning however, flourished because of its purity of monotheistic belief and its uncompromising emphasis on a moral code for humanity including universal social justice and opposition to oppression. Over the years countless individuals have become Muslim and adopted Islamic values. Unfortunately too many so-called Muslims have abandoned Islamic teachings and joined in the ranks of oppressors, engaging in acts of injustice, terrorism, and disregard for the sanctity of human life. Professor Yvonne Haddad of Hartford Seminary asked students in her history class, “What is the first thing that comes to your mind when you hear the word Muslim?” All but one, a Muslim student, responded spontaneously “terrorism.”
    The perception of Islam even before 9/11 was not favorable. In 1993, the LA times asked 1273 readers nationwide a number of questions about the religion and its adherents. Asked their impression of Islam, 14 percent indicated “favorable,” 22 percent “unfavorable,” and 64 percent indicated they didn’t know or have an opinion. In the same poll, 41 percent viewed Islam as an antidemocratic religion, and 29 percent thought that Islam poses a threat to the security of United Sates and its Western allies. The perception of Islam after 9/11 has become more negative. According to a 2013 PEW research study, the Islamic religion is considered by 42 percent of the respondents to encourage violence compared to 22 percent in 2002.

    Does Islam Promote Violence and Terrorism?

    Central to the issue of violence and terrorism is the concept of jihad. The word “jihad” literally means “struggle,” which in Islamic terms means to strive in the way of God. Any struggle done in day-to-day life to please God can be considered jihad. Despite the assertions by Muslim extremists, which is then parroted and highlighted by opponents of Islam, the natural state of affairs with non-Muslims is not one of war. As pointed out by Shaykh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, every Muslim is a mujahid (one who engages in jihad) but not a muqatil (fighter). In a paper “What is New about Al-Qaradawi’s Fiqh of Jihad?” by Rashid Al-Ghannoushi, the author notes that Al-Qaradawi distinguishes between two types of jihad – military and civil, and that military jihad involves the defense of Muslims when they are attacked. As to civil jihad, he quotes from Al-Qaradawi’s book to show that civil jihad “encompasses the academic, scientific, cultural, social, economic, educational, health, medical, environmental and civilizational fields. The objective of this civil jihad is to exert oneself for Allah’s sake in order to educate the ignorant, employ the unemployed, train workers, feed the hungry, clothe the naked, house the homeless, treat the ill, achieve self-sufficiency for the needy, build schools for pupils, universities for students, mosques for worshippers, clubs for sports lovers to practice their hobbies.” Al-Ghannoushi also points out that Shaykh Al-Qaradawi asserts that Islam calls for interaction with the non-Muslim world, not isolation.

    Interfaith Interaction, Not Isolation

    I sincerely believe interfaith dialogue and activism is the need of the time. Interfaith involvement is not giving up one’s faith or compromising one’s beliefs but engaging in a process of self-education about others and finding opportunities for dawah through interaction and exchange of views. It is coming together on common ground as fellow human beings. It is a venue for sharing one’s faith with others.
    An experience of great satisfaction for me has been interfaith dialogue with others. One of my dialogue partners, a Benedictine nun, Sister Mary Margaret Funk, wrote a popular book titled, “Islam Is: An Experience of Dialogue and Devotion.” Despite the fact that the world has become a global village, sometimes followers of faith traditions live in their own closed enclaves, never venturing outside to see how other people live or believe, and likewise, never inviting people of other faith traditions into their domain. Thus, fear of others is sometimes as a result of not knowing one another. Knowing each other is not only a social need but a divine injunction. Quran says, “We have created you from a single pair of souls and made you into nations and tribes that you might know one another” (Quran 49:13). Just because a person has a skin color different than mine, was born into a land different than where I was born, or prays to God but in a different manner or in a different language than my own, he or she does not become less worthy of my respect and caring for his or her well-being. As a physician, I know that beneath the surface differences, the color of the blood is the same, the contraction of the muscles is the same, and the structural purpose of the skeleton is the same – in each and every human being. So the outer differences manifested in the diversity of the human family is no justification for discriminating against others on the basis of skin color, ethnicity, gender, or faith tradition, as we must accept that God, in His omniscience and wisdom, created humanity with a diversity that challenges us to interact and get to know one another in peaceful and cooperative ways.
    Muslims, in the tradition of Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him), have always entered into interfaith dialogue with people of other faiths, conveying in straightforward ways that the messages of previous prophets are from the same God who has asked us to know one another. Thus, when a Christian delegation came to find out about the Prophet and Islam, he allowed them to stay in the mosque, engaged them in friendly, respectful discussion, and allowed them to pray according to their Christian traditions. He also sent delegations to different parts of the world with the task of explaining to other peoples the mission of the Prophet. Interfaith dialogues should not be interfaith debates. Interfaith work is directed toward creating a better and more tolerant environment in a pluralistic society. Its main purpose is to create mutual understanding and appreciation among people of different faiths, to cooperate in striving toward mutually agreed-upon goals, and to support and promote peaceful coexistence in society.

    Ramadan: A Prime Opportunity

    Ramadan is the most blessed month in Islam. It is an occasion to share iftar meals with family, friends, neighbors, and non-Muslims. It is a prime opportunity to talk about Islam and present accurate information, as well as to dispel any misconceptions one’s guests might have about Islam and Muslims. In 1992, Interfaith Alliance of Indiana started an interfaith Ramadan iftar and the White House, State Department, Pentagon, and many governors and mayors have all adopted participation in this tradition as a norm. Many Muslims opposed interfaith activities and initiatives until after 9/11, and then the need became apparent and more and more mosques started holding their own interfaith iftars. In 1993, I conducted a survey of non-Muslim attendees to our iftar about their perception of Islam before and after attending the interfaith iftar (published in Dr. Laleh Bakhtiar’s book, “Ramadan-Motivating Believers to Action”). Out of 93 attendees who responded, 87 said they learned much about Islam and 89 said the experience removed misconceptions in their minds about Islam. Many looked forward to coming back for the next year’s iftar. One Christian attendee fasted a full day to experience the challenge and joy of fasting. Two attendees joined Muslims in maghrib prayer (much to the dislike of some Muslims). In Indiana, the tradition has continued with an annual iftar hosted by the Governor and the Mayor. Last year when representatives of Al Salaam Foundation went to Carmel, Indiana (about 25 miles north of Indianapolis) to invite the mayor to the interfaith iftar, Mayor Brainard asked, “Do you have a mosque or place for the function?” They told him they didn’t as of that time. He then offered his home to hold the
    interfaith iftar. Over 200 Muslims and non-Muslims attended, including Congresswoman Susan Brooks (R-Indiana).
    Many Opportunities to Interact and Engage
    In addition to interfaith iftars, there are countless other opportunities for Muslims to interact with the non-Muslim community so as to promote understanding and peaceful relations. Following are a few options:
    Interfaith Thanksgiving – Muslims should join with other Americans in giving thanks to God for placing them in the land of opportunity and religious freedom. Muslim families can invite their neighbors for Thanksgiving dinner or an Islamic center can offer Thanksgiving dinner for the needy.
    Free health clinic – These can be offered through the mosque, in conjunction with another religiously or community sponsored free clinic, or by one or more Muslim physicians at their private practice offices.
    Food pantry for the needy – This is a wonderful opportunity to relieve the suffering of another human being and act on the teachings of Prophet Mohammad (pbuh) who has said “He is not a Muslim who goes to sleep with full stomach but his neighbor goes to sleep with an empty stomach.”
    Participation in the political process – Voting for candidates who support social justice and other issues that are important to Muslims is essential. Educating oneself to know which candidates promote values that are consistent with Islamic norms is part of exercising one’s civic rights and acting according to democratic principles. Immigrant Muslims should bring their hearts where their bodies are. Home is not where grandparents are buried but where grandchildren play and will encounter their future. Pave the way for a positive future for them by engaging in the political process.
    Imam Fakhri Al Razi is known to have said “We should cease to divide world between Darul Islam [domain of Islam] and Darul Kufr [domain of disbelief] but divide the world into Darul Islam and Darul Dawah. Thus, if you are not living in Darul Islam, you are in Darul Dawah.” Dawah to Islam includes giving lectures, pamphlets, CDs and other materials; but it is also, and so importantly, the conduct (akhlaq) of a Muslim. The best example is that of our beloved Prophet (pbuh), who was sent as a mercy to mankind.

  • The Meaning and Making of Interfaith Dialogue

    The Meaning and Making of Interfaith Dialogue

    Ignorance breeds prejudice, and misinformation multiplies the harm. Among religious communities, this dynamic of confusion becomes vulnerable to extremist manipulation on all sides, and is particularly volatile if there is no communication among the more moderate and responsible elements within those respective communities. While there are various ways such communication can take place, interfaith dialogue is certainly among the most effective. The nature and objectives of interfaith dialogue, however, are unclear to many people. Some Muslims, for example, oppose interfaith dialogue, suggesting that it is part of ecumenism, and ecumenism is Christian. Similarly, some Evangelical Christian churches also call the mainstream Christians who participate in interfaith dialogue “infidels.” Removing this confusion by delineating what interfaith dialogue is and how it works is not only necessary, it is imperative.

    Interfaith dialogue creates mutual understanding among the adherents of different faiths

    Interfaith dialogue is a way of communication among religious communities that helps the dialogue partners understand each other’s beliefs, values, and concerns. Contrary to what many people think or suggest, the goal of this dialogue is not to eliminate differences of opinion and create a new religion, nor is it meant for seeking ways to defeat or silence others. Rather, its purpose is to create mutual understanding among the adherents of different faiths and traditions so that peaceful and meaningful co-existence becomes a reality.

    Interfaith dialogue can take place and advance its aims if the participants demonstrate mutual respect and sincere commitment. All parties have to be willing to work together for a common purpose while keeping their proper manners, humbleness, truthfulness, fairness, and overall goodwill alive and active. Participants must be keen to uphold and preserve the right and freedom of worship for all people under all circumstances, and to acknowledge the legitimacy (in the most primary sense: “there is no coercion in religion” – 2:256) and depth of devotion of another’s belief even when it differs significantly from one’s own faith tradition.

    That does not mean sacrificing, in any way, the doctrines, principles, and traditions of one’s own religion. As interfaith activist Shahid Athar has rightly pointed out: “Interfaith dialogue is not [about] accepting all or even part of the other faiths on a theological basis.” Interfaith activist Jaco Cilliers furthers this idea that one’s own beliefs are not undermined but rather strengthened: “Indeed, interfaith dialogue is constructive only when people become firmly grounded in their own religious traditions and through that process gain a willingness to listen and respect the beliefs of other religions.”

    It is unfortunate that some Muslims, typically those who hold extremely conservative and narrow minded views, vigorously campaign against interfaith dialogue, citing Qur’anic verses such as: “It is He Who has sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of Truth that he may proclaim it over all religions, even though the disbelievers may detest [it]” (61:9).They claim that this verse condemns interfaith dialogue. However, analysing this verse within a wider Islamic context, analysts have suggested that such an interpretation is incorrect. As noted by M. Shafiq and Abu-Nimar, the essence and instruction of this verse bring us to the realization that, “first, Islam is the message of truth and that Muslims have to do their best to spread it. Second, some people always resist the truth when it is brought to their community. And third, Muslims must be ready to face the ensuing consequences and find positive ways to deal with them. As we know, truth cannot be spread amidst hostility, but only with proper behavior and patience. One has to do one’s best to create a peaceful environment of trust. The Prophet (saas) provided us with such a model when he signed the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah with his Makkan opponents, the very ones who had expelled him and his followers from Makkah. He could see that this treaty would lead to peace and that by signing it, the Muslims would be able to move freely in a peaceful atmosphere and spread Islam. This verse demands that Muslims build good relations with others” (Interfaith Dialogue: A Guide for Muslims, VA: IIIT, p.8).

    Sadly, it’s too common that some people perform religious rituals and practice religious traditions without understanding and internalizing the meaning and the implications of the teachings. If they make meager effort to understand their own religion in a deeper way, we should not be surprised that they are little inclined to try and understand the beliefs and traditions of others. They fail to recognize the fact that diversity in religious beliefs and traditions must not be judged by human beings, for it is the domain of the Divine. As a believer in a particular religion, one is certainly entitled to propagate his/her belief including warning people that “rejection of [true and correct] belief in God will surely have consequences in the afterlife.” But a believer has to accept the reality that it’s up to God to determine the recompense for each individual. So, human freedom and choice must not be denied in this world under any pretext. Interfaith dialogue speaks for this right and thereby creates a better and more tolerant environment. It facilitates mutual understanding and promotes peace, justice, and harmony in a pluralistic society. Every conscientious person therefore should support and work for this great cause.

     

  • Interfaith Action on Hunger: A Shared Obligation

    With more than 1 billion undernourished people – many of them children – across the globe, hunger is a problem that affects all religions and nationalities. The roots of hunger are as diverse as the communities that it affects; conflict, natural disaster, water shortages, disease, climate change, and, of course, poverty are among the many other factors involved.

    Solving a problem that affects people of all faiths requires the active support and participation of people from all those faiths. Individually, all major faiths call upon their adherents to exhibit compassion by helping the needy. Muslims, Christians, Jews, Hindus and others have since time immemorial supported projects, activities, and organizations dedicated to helping feed the poor, sick, and hungry. Maximizing the impact of these efforts by increasing interfaith collaboration is an important next step to eradicating hunger; fortunately this collaboration has already begun in the United States and abroad.

    A Shared Compulsion to Act

    Muslims, Christians, Jews, and others all find clear language in their holy books and traditions that compel them to fight hunger and poverty.

    For Muslims, this fight is fundamental to the faith; it is the essence of zakat, the third pillar. The importance of charity is underscored throughout the Quran (e.g., Surah 2, verse 110). This charity is not only directed toward fellow Muslims. The Quran (4: 36) calls believers to “do good – to parents, kinsfolk, orphans, those in need, neighbors who are near, neighbors who are strangers, the Companion by your side…” Charity should be directed broadly, not limited to fellow Muslims. Recall that “If Allah had so willed, He would have made you a single people, but (His plan is) to test you in what He hath given you: so strive as in a race in all virtues” (Quran 5:48).

    This broader sense of community, and the individual’s responsibility toward those in need regardless of identity, suggest that Muslims should extend their hands across faith lines to collaborate in the struggle against hunger. The Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is commonly quoted as having said that “the person who sleeps full while his neighbor sleeps hungry is not a true believer.”

    Similarly, the Bible calls all Christians to take action and provide for the poor and hungry without discrimination. “If a brother or sister lacks food and one of you says, ‘go in peace,’ and yet do not supply their bodily needs, what is the good of that? Faith if it has no works is dead” (James 2:15-17). Helping the hungry has great spiritual benefits for Christians: “If you offer your food to the hungry and satisfy the needs of the afflicted, then your light shall rise in the darkness and your gloom be like the noonday” (Isaiah 58:10). The Good Samaritan parable in the Gospel of Luke (10: 25-37) makes clear the importance of loving and helping one’s neighbor regardless of identity.

    Recent Christian thought has emphasized the unambiguous value of helping the hungry. A powerful statement about the importance of fighting hunger came from Pope Benedict XVI in his 2009 encyclical Caritas in Veritate. Drawing inspiration from earlier writings by his predecessor Paul VI, Pope Benedict XVI stated that feeding the hungry “is an ethical imperative for the universal [Roman Catholic] Church.”

    For Jews, the Torah places hunger and poverty at the center of the faith. Leviticus (19:9-10) calls on Jews to give to the poor the corners of their fields and to leave them any fallen fruit. This is in the context of a concern for others that is not limited to fellow Jews; it is in the spirit of “Love thy neighbor as thyself” (Lev.19:18).

    Alleviating hunger is of great importance to those outside of the great monotheistic traditions, as well. The Mahabharata (XIII.59.11), one of Hinduism’s great Sanskrit epics, states that “[t]here is none other who does greater good than the one who removes the hunger of those in a difficult situation, helpless, weak and disturbed.” Gandhi and other leading thinkers and activists throughout the faith’s history have been inspired by Hinduism’s call to action against hunger.

    If the concern for the poor and hungry is shared across religious boundaries, and there is agreement that this concern must not be limited to co-religionists, then there is reason to work together to defeat the scourge of hunger. Interfaith action to fight hunger is therefore a way for members of each religion to practice their personal faiths, while strengthening their capacity to have a positive social impact through coordinated action across faith lines.

    Interfaith Action against Hunger

    Why is it important to increase the number of interfaith approaches to the hunger problem rather than to develop free-standing initiatives for each faith tradition?

    The efficiency argument dictates that interfaith initiatives are more likely to succeed in reaching a greater percentage of people in need. In much of the world, adherents to different religious groups live side-by-side within their communities. An interfaith approach can help compassionate projects reach more of society’s neediest and thus maximize a project’s impact. The spirit of compassion that can be found in all major religions is best expressed by an approach that builds bridges and extends a helping hand to all who are in need.

    Tackling hunger – or other pressing issues – in a joint manner can also have noticeable side benefits. In the United States, working together with non-Muslims can allow members of the country’s diverse and growing Muslim population to contribute positively to both the fight against hunger and the struggle against unfair negative stereotypes of Muslims. For example, in New York City, the Islamic Cultural Center on East 96th Street collaborates with the Jewish Theological Seminary and a Presbyterian church to operate a soup kitchen. The shared compulsion to feed the hungry and protect the vulnerable in one’s community drives a collaboration that has forged bonds of friendship and respect among volunteers of multiple religions.

    Other examples, both small and large, can be found around the United States and the world. The Indiana-based Interfaith Hunger Initiative – a partnership between local Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist and Sikh congregations – is founded on the belief that “working together across faith lines on an important project will strengthen our community.” The initiative supports several local food pantries in Marion County, Indiana and a school lunch program in Kenya that feeds some 2700 vulnerable children, including many AIDS orphans. Other programs, from the New Jersey-based Middlesex County Coalition to Combat Poverty and Hunger to the Idaho Interfaith Roundtable Against Hunger, provide opportunities for local interfaith action.

    In countries with a history of conflict characterized by friction between members of different religious groups, interfaith projects can help build trust and reduce tensions. In this way, programs that seek to relieve the most pressing hunger can alleviate conflict and thus address an important root cause of hunger.

    Internationally, a significant example comes from Nigeria – a country of about 150 million people split roughly half-and-half between Muslims and Christians and with a history of ethno-religious strife. The Nigerian Inter-Faith Action Association (NIFAA), a non-governmental organization co-chaired by the leaders of the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs and the Christian Association of Nigeria, has mobilized tens of thousands of imams, pastors, and priests to become active partners in an interfaith campaign against poverty and disease, beginning with malaria, a disease that costs the country 12 percent of its annual GDP, according to one study. The economic loss associated with malaria is a major contributor to hunger in Nigeria. To the extent that an interfaith approach can both reduce this burden and forge peaceful ties of friendship between Muslim and Christian leaders, NIFAA’s program can strike at multiple root causes of poverty and hunger.

    An additional vehicle for interfaith action is advocacy designed to change policies and increase investments in programs to end hunger. A leading advocacy group is the Alliance to End Hunger, which includes influential Muslim, Christian, Jewish, and secular organizations in its campaign to raise the issue of hunger on the national agenda.

    Around the world, Muslims, Christians, Jews, Hindus, and others are hard at work, working together to eliminate hunger. Individual Muslims and other can support these efforts in any number of ways, as interfaith action is valuable in a wide range of initiatives that target hunger, from local soup kitchens and food banks to programs that invest in international food security or engage in global advocacy.

    Growing Interfaith Action on Hunger

    With these and countless other examples of interfaith collaboration on hunger, there is little doubt that the idea has caught on, and that people of all faiths are acting upon their religious duty to care for the needy among us and broaden our conception of the global neighborhood. As the Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) said, “None of you has faith until you love for your brother what you love for yourself” (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Kitab al-Iman, Hadith no.13), and “None of you has faith until you love for your neighbor what you love for yourself“(Sahih Muslim , Kitab al-Iman, 67-1, Hadith no.45). When such love turns into acts of true compassion across faith lines, it can forge a better future for everyone.