بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Author: Abu Aqila

  • Poor People’s Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival

    Poor People’s Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival

    Historians and scholars of social justice movements alike routinely credit Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. as being the catalyst and preeminent leader of the Civil Rights Movement of the mid-1950s to late 1960s. He was vilified by Southern and Northern racists and fervently avoided by more conservative, accommodationist African American ministers, politicians, and community leaders. King, nevertheless, galvanized the masses of Southern Blacks to embrace non-violent civil disobedience as a vehicle for social change and equality. His April 4, 1967 speech, “Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence,” in New York City’s Riverside Church was for the most part negatively received, and his already diminishing support took a further hit that he never recovered from, even up to the time of his assassination exactly one year later. There existed an unwritten rule that Civil Rights leaders like King should refrain from publicly sharing their personal opinions on United States policy decisions involving international issues like the Vietnam War and stick to domestic race relations.

    King felt strongly, though, that the money allocated to violence, death, and destruction of Brown people on the other side of the world was well within his purview. In addition to the injustice of the war culture, the money could be better spent on improving the quality of life for poor people here at home. In an exhibition of principled courage on behalf of the poor, King articulately pointed out that President Johnson’s War on Poverty was a failed campaign and would continue to be as long as the Vietnam War continued to garner the lion’s share of the federal budget.

    Dr. King Calls Upon Government to Alleviate Poverty

    After the financial and human resources of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) plummeted following his Beyond Vietnam speech, King sought means to invigorate the once potent support base for his work. He announced, at a retreat for the SCLC in November 1967, his intention to organize a national Poor People’s Campaign the following year in Washington, D.C. This idea was the brainchild of Marion Wright, the dynamic director of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People’s Legal Defense Fund in Jackson, Mississippi. The proposed Poor People’s Campaign was to be launched on Mother’s Day, May 12, 1968. Its aim was to systematically call upon Congress and then-President Lyndon Johnson, through a multiracial coalition of African Americans, White Americans, Native Americans, and Hispanic Americans, for the alleviation of poverty in the United States. King hoped that “poor people of all colors and backgrounds would win their right to a decent life and respect for their culture and dignity.”

    By 1967, the Black Freedom Movement was influenced by young African Americans who accepted non-violence as a situational strategy but rejected it as a philosophy to live by. The leaders included H. Rap Brown (Imam Jamil Al-Amin), Stokely Carmichael (Kwame Toure), Huey Newton, Angela Davis, Bobby Seale, Kathleen Cleaver, and Attorney Chokwe Lumumba. King envisioned the Poor People’s Campaign as a “…Middle ground between riots on the one hand and timid supplications for justice on the other… Let’s find something that is so possible, so achievable, so pure, so simple.” Rev. King remarked, “that even the backlash can’t do much to deny it. And yet something so non-token that even the black nationalists can’t disagree with it that much.” The Mother’s Day March received commitments of support from the leaders of Native Americans, Chicanos, Puerto Ricans, women rights groups, anti-war groups, and various White American social justice groups.

    A New Leader for the SCLC

    Rev. King was tragically assassinated on April 4, 1968, approximately one month before the Poor People’s Campaign. Against protestations from leading members of his staff, Dr. King went to Memphis, Tennessee following repeated appeals from the leaders of the sanitation workers to physically appear in the city to support their strike. Following King’s assassination, Rev. Ralph Abernathy, a fellow activist and close friend of King, became the new leader of SCLC. The difficult decision was made to continue the campaign as planned, starting with thousands of women converging on Washington, D.C. on Mother’s Day, to demand from legislators economic equality and removal of the structural racism barriers that impeded, if not prohibited, economic opportunities for all Americans. Resurrection City, a temporary settlement of wooden and tin shacks, tents, and improvised sleeping arrangements, was erected on the Washington Mall. The encampment dwellers were plagued with seemingly unending rain, mud, and extreme heat for one month. Every day, participants visited legislators and their staff members, calling for action on their demands. The presence of Dr. King was sorely missed, but this did not diminish the significance and historic nature of the 1968 Poor People’s Campaign. The Interior Department forced Resurrection City to shut down after its permit of occupancy expired.

    Fast Forward to June 20, 2020

    The social and economic crucible that existed over half a century ago for Blacks and other people of color in the U.S. necessitated a civil and human rights struggle to bring about meaningful change. Frederick Douglass, 19th century abolitionist and arguably one of the greatest orators and lifetime champions for the oppressed, is famously quoted as saying, “Power concedes nothing without a demand, it never has, and it never will.” It is unfortunate that the economic conditions today in the United States for the poor are relatively the same, or in some instances worse, than they were in the 1950s and 60s. Fortunately, there are individuals today who demonstrate fervent commitment, as did Dr. King, to meet the “fierce urgency of now.” Speaking in 1957, Dr. King stated, “In this juncture of our nation’s history, there is an urgent need for dedicated and courageous leadership.” Many people see Dr. William J. Barber, II, a North Carolina-based pastor, political activist, and member of the national board of the NAACP, as an example of the type of leadership that is needed during turbulent times.

    In 2006, Rev. Barber, then-president of the North Carolina NAACP, and a group of activists brought together sixteen progressive statewide organizations to launch the Historic Thousands on Jones Street coalition (HKONJ). Those sixteen grew to more than two hundred civic and religious groups. “We recognized that many of the same political forces that are against say gender rights, are often also against education equality, environmental justice, and policies that help the poor,” states Rev. Barber. In 2013, he started the Forward Together Moral Movement, nicknamed Moral Monday, a series of weekly protests on the grounds of the state capital in Raleigh, North Carolina. Over 1,000 religious leaders, social activists, teachers, union members, voting rights advocates, elected officials, and others were willfully arrested as they silently protested harsh and immoral laws in the halls of the General Assembly.

    The Moral Monday gatherings evolved into a genuine fusion movement of interests and constituencies at unprecedented levels in the state. In a report put out by The Poor People’s Campaign, “The Souls of Poor Folk,” the authors state “…the Fusion coalition, avoiding partisan and ideological divisions and focusing on common moral and democratic values, stitched together a huge coalition of poor, wealthy, and middle class, medical professionals and the uninsured, Christians, Jews, Muslims, and people from other faith traditions alongside non-religious citizens who shared their belief in a social order grounded in love…” Never one to rest on his laurels, Rev. Barber resigned from the presidency of North Carolina NAACP in May 2017 and, along with Rev. Liz Theoharis, Co-Director of the Kairos Center at Union Theological Seminary in New York, organized the Poor People’s Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival. Rev. Barber readily acknowledges that Dr. King and the 52nd anniversary of the historic Poor People’s Campaign were his inspirations to organize this year’s event. Since 2017, Rev. Barber and Rev. Theoharis have visited 25 cities, conducting organizing sessions for the national mobilization of Poor People’s Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival on June 20, 2020 in Washington, D.C. The report, “The Souls of Poor Folk,” states, “The Poor People’s Campaign has developed out of years of organizing across the United States. In communities across this land, people impacted by systemic racism, poverty, ecological devastation, the war economy and our distorted moral narrative have said the same thing: ’We want to be free! We need a Moral Revival to make this county great for so many for whom it has not yet been…’ We face a crisis in America: more than two in five Americans are poor or low-income, while millions of children and adults continue to live without access to health care, housing, clean water, or good jobs. At the same time, the issues of poverty and racism have been forced to the margins of the moral narrative and debate in our society.” Tens of thousands of men, women, and children of all races, religions, and ideological perspectives are expected to converge on the nation’s capital for the group’s Mass Poor People’s Assembly and Moral March on Washington.

    Barber inspires others to stand tall and hold up the banner that proclaims our commitment to continue the efforts of individuals like Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Barber states, “We’ve got to hold up the banner until every person has health care, we’ve got to hold it up until every child is lifted in love, we’ve got to hold it up until every job is a living-wage job, until every person in poverty has guaranteed subsistence.” On Saturday, June 20, the attention of the nation will likely be transfixed on Washington, D.C, not on the usual political rhetoric from Beltway politicians, but on the voices of poor and low-wealth individuals and families. Like their counterparts from decades ago, they have been systematically denied access to opportunities to change their families’ socio-economic condition. It is also likely that echoes from the words and commitment of Rev. King may resonate with the crowd some 52 years after his demise.

  • The Importance of “Embracing” Muslim Converts

    The Importance of “Embracing” Muslim Converts

    Allah SWT says in the Quran, “If you had been harsh or hard-hearted with them, they would have dispersed from around you” (3:159). In this verse, Allah informs Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, that if he were harsh with his companions — individuals who are seen as the very best of all Muslims — they would walk away from him and Islam. Instead the Prophet (pbuh) was instructed to be lenient and merciful with them.
    The Quran was revealed over a 23-year period, allowing the faith of the early Muslims to deepen and strengthen with increasing knowledge and experience. Similarly, those who embrace Islam today should be treated with patience and compassion to help them grow. They should have an environment of support and guidance in which they can trust those around them, identify with them, and develop a sense of community and family. Yet, there is a misconception that Muslim converts automatically have the strongest imaan (faith), due to the fact they chose the religion instead of being born into it. Just as in the case of the earliest Muslims, the imaan of converts today is something that needs to grow and develop over time. Embrace, a project of ICNA that has been operational for about a year, highlights this need in their mission statement: “To serve, empower, integrate, and nourish the diverse Muslim convert community by providing safe social spaces that encourage growth, shape their Islamic identity, and equip them with the knowledge they need for their lifetime journey.”

    Programs Implemented by Embrace

    Embrace has already implemented a number of programs to carry out this mission. The project has established weekly halaqahs (religious meeting; study circle) at two locations. These meetings are led by two imams, both converts to Islam. In fact, Embrace is managed by converts as they are better able to teach Islam to new Muslims from a perspective they can more easily identify with. Embrace leaders and teachers are also better able to understand some of the unique challenges converts face, and how to respond to and support the new converts based on their own experience of converting to Islam. The two halaqahs are growing and there are members who consistently attend, grateful for the environment these halaqahs provide, a comfortable and supportive space for them to grow as Muslims. The halaqahs are also live-streamed on Facebook every week, allowing Embrace to serve converts who cannot attend that day, as well as those who are not local.
    During the halaqahs, open and engaging discussion is encouraged. Members are warmly welcomed to share their views and experiences, and all questions are answered. Personal development, along with spiritual growth, are encouraged, as part of the Embrace vision is helping converts cultivate leadership skills and eventually take on leadership roles in the Islamic movement in the U.S. Embrace strives to educate new Muslims about the religion, free of any cultural or sectarian slant or bias, and helping converts stay clear of misconceptions about Islam and/or Muslims by following the Quran and the sunnah (example) of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Additionally, Embrace focuses on the community aspect of Islam. Brotherhood/sisterhood is an essential component of Allah’s deen, and Embrace strives to provide an authentic sense of community, a place to strengthen the bonds of shared belief and fellowship.
    With this aim, potluck dinners are held after the halaqah the third week of each month. Seasonal potlucks are also held outside of the scheduled halaqahs, and members are requested to bring their families along for the fun. Members of Embrace are affectionately referred to as the “Embrace family,” promoting a sense of belonging, love, and trust. This is important as many converts experience a strain in family relationships after they accept Islam. Some become completely estranged from family members. Embrace can thus function as a new family, providing assurance that the convert is not alone as they continue on their journey of faith.
    Embrace has also hosted 18 iftars (meals to break the daily fast) during the month of Ramadan. These iftars were either held at the halaqahs or at the home of one of the Embrace members. For Eid-ul-Fitr (celebration at the end of Ramadan), Embrace hosted a dinner with over 100 converts and their families attending and celebrating together. This is especially important as Ramadan and Eid can be the loneliest times for converts. Muslims enjoy daily iftars and celebrate Eid with their families. Converts typically have no Muslim family to celebrate these occasions with. Many Embrace members are so appreciative for these programs; for some, this was the first Ramadan and Eid during which they did not feel alone.

    Embrace’s Plans for the Future

    Embrace is still in a developmental stage and has many plans for the future. One future program will be “Pass the Mic” sessions. The aim is to give converts an opportunity to voice concerns, difficulties, and ideas. The inspiration for this program came from the 3rd Annual Converts Conference in the Dallas/Fort Worth area in April of this year. More than one hundred converts attended, and it has become apparent that their voices need to be heard, as they best know what challenges they face and difficulties they experience as converts.
    Another planned project will be monthly community service sessions. Muslims must be a benefit to any society to which they belong and serving others in the larger community breaks down negative stereotypes about Islam and Muslims, helping to form a more positive perception of the religion and its followers in the minds of fellow Americans. Embrace is, therefore, working towards the development of a social service center for the more impoverished and neglected areas in the Dallas/Fort Worth area. It is envisioned that the center will provide basic skills training, personal development opportunities, job referrals, and other services.
    In addition to programs geared to community/fellowship or service to others, Embrace recognizes the need for an educational program. This project will offer Islam 101 classes to teach converts the basics of deen. Also under consideration is a mentorship program in which veteran members will be trained to teach and support new Muslims in their journey, step-by-step. Eventually, Embrace wants to conduct cultural and ethnic sensitivity training for converts as well as the greater Muslim community. As Allah SWT tells us in the Quran, “O humankind! We created you from a male and a female and made you into nations and tribes that you may know one another. Verily the most honored of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you. And Allah has full knowledge and is well acquainted [with all things]” (49:13). It is so important that Muslims, who make up the greatest diversity of ethnicities and cultures around the world, interact with one another in the most respectful and caring way. The diversity is a strength and a resource, but only if Muslims take seriously the challenge of fostering awareness, respect, and inclusion.

    Challenges and Potentials

    Converts too often feel like outsiders at the Masjid, especially if there is a particular ethnic and cultural influence that pervades the atmosphere, and the convert feels surrounded by individuals speaking a different language and practicing cultural norms different from what he or she is used to. So one challenge Embrace faces is that many converts do not attend or participate in mosque activities. Alternative ways must be found to reach out to them. Another issue is that local Muslim communities often do not recognize the importance of a support system for converts, or do not see that as high on their priority list. An objective of Embrace is to educate local communities about this, conveying to them the imperative responsibility of providing a support system for converts in their community. By Allah’s will, Embrace will continue to grow, helping to guide new Muslims along the path they have chosen, deepening their faith, increasing their knowledge, and cultivating attributes of an Islamic character and personality. Many have potential to eventually assume the role of leaders in our communities.
    African-American Muslims have long been born and raised in this country. Second and third generation Muslims, those whose parents and/or grandparents are immigrants from various nations, have in more recent times been born and raised in the U.S. Joining these two groups are the converts, citizens who are Caucasian, African American, Hispanic, and others. This is a beautiful tapestry of believers, dedicated to truth, social justice, and a community of caring. Islam is meant for all of mankind, regardless of where one is from. ICNA will continue striving to transform Islam in America into a resource of positivity. Embrace can act as the perfect vanguard in bringing the converts fully into the fold and fostering their potential contributions to both the Muslim community and the American community at large.

  • Caught in the Crucible of Turtle Island

    Caught in the Crucible of Turtle Island

    Caught in the Crucible of Turtle Island: Native Americans and Africans in America

    The documentation of interaction between Native Americans and Africans in America during the European colonization of North America is arguably the least known chapter of this land’s social history. Euro-centric historians summarily dismiss references to the symbiosis of Native Americans and Africans in America as being less than factual, if not outright distortions of historical research. The prevailing narrative about this complicated and layered relationship is simply that most Native American tribes traded in and enslaved African men, women, and children.
    There is little disagreement among the academic community that the first known inhabitants of the Western hemisphere were Native Americans. Similarly, the fact that the largest single group of inhabitants, residing in North America from the 16th to the 19th century were enslaved Africans is also uncontested. The coming together of these two peoples, both rich in culture, languages, history, creation stories and concepts of the Creator, predated their fateful collision with Europeans. In 1312, Abu Bakari II, the Muslim king of the Mali empire, set sail across the Atlantic Ocean with hundreds of ships of men and women, and hundreds more filled with supplies, to explore the unknown limits of that vast body of water. Evidentiary findings suggest that they landed on the northeast coast of Brazil and explored this new world into the continent’s interior and followed waterways, including the Amazon River in South America and the Mississippi River in North America.
    Archaeological findings of their presence in South and Central America, as well as the United States, have been limited mostly to coinage, mixed gold-tipped arrows, pottery, and the introduction of 14th century Mande and Fula words and expressions into Native languages. On cave walls in the southwestern United States, Native Americans drew very dark-skinned men sitting atop huge animals that bear a striking resemblance to elephants, creatures that are not native to this part of the world. Like many of the South American villages of the Incan Empire, the largest and most sophisticated pre-Columbian empire in the Americas, jungles had overgrown and reclaimed once thriving communities. Similar artifacts were found in the southwest United States and Mexico. According to the entries in the handwritten chronicles of Christopher Columbus in 1493, he observed and heard of very dark-skinned Indians. The misnomer applied to the indigenous people of the Caribbean Islands after Columbus mistakenly believed that he had arrived in the country of India. The men among the dark-skinned people wore colorful shirts and turbans while the women wore long dresses and face veils. He noted that he had seen some of these dark-skinned people traveling in the direction of the African continent in vessels similar to the ships used by the Moors of Spain.
    A Nefarious Trade
    While celebrated as the founder of America, even though he never set foot on continental North or South America, Columbus was, in fact, a plunderer and initiator of European slavery and genocide against the indigenous population in his self-proclaimed New World. As a businessman and adventurer, he envisioned developing a lucrative trade in the trans-Atlantic transport of Native Americans to Spain to be auctioned off as slaves. His first business venture in the western hemisphere was to capture and send 550 Natives to Spain for this purpose. Because of this nefarious trade in human beings initiated by Columbus, Spain became Europe’s leading slaving power. In the early 1500s, Spain’s monarchs outlawed the practice of enslaving Native Americans except in special circumstances. Around 1531, they mandated by royal decree that no enslaved African Muslims were allowed into the New World under any circumstances. Violation of this offense was punishable by imprisonment or death. This prohibition did not apply to the general African population. The Spanish monarchs were painfully familiar with the near 800-year Muslim rule over much of the Iberian Peninsula. They did not want to be responsible for facilitating a similar phenomenon in the Western lands. By 1542, King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella completely prohibited slavery in territories claimed by the Crown. Their royal edict did little to curb the lucrative trafficking of Native American slaves to South America, Cape Verde Islands, and to the Philippines, by unscrupulous Spanish merchants and conquistadores.
    Contrary to the popular notion perpetuated today in public schools and institutions of higher learning in the U.S., that the indigenous population was deemed unsuitable for enslavement by the colonizers, the reality was in stark contrast. Even though the enslavement of Native Americans was illegal in many parts of the country, it continued unofficially, from coast to coast, under different names from the 16th to the late 19th century. Western settlers in the United States were surprised to learn that Native Americans were toiling as slaves in the free-state of California in the 1830s and 1840s, and that in 1846, the state legislature had enacted vagrancy laws to arrest and hire out Natives much the same way that free Blacks in Southern states were forced to work against their will through convict leasing. The vagrancy laws made it a crime to be unemployed or even not to be able to show proof of employment.
    For Natives encountering Spanish, British, and other European fortune seekers for the first time, few could understand their singular obsession with the yellow metal, gold, found in hills and streams beneath their feet. Columbus and the early conquistadores of the 16th through 19th centuries, with their insatiable thirst for gold, required a submissive labor force to harvest the precious substance. It is, moreover, conservatively estimated that during the centuries following Admiral Columbus’ trans-Atlantic trade of enslaved Native Americans, over five to ten million indigenous people of all ages suffered in the Western hemisphere’s “Other Slavery.”
    Into the Crucible
    Native Americans and enslaved Africans were inextricably thrown together in the crucible of Turtle Island (Turtle Island is a Native American name for North America). Native American creation stories are replete with animals as primary, if not sole, characters. In creation stories found in the oral myths of numerous indigenous tribes, turtles are significant players. One such myth relates how dirt beneath the waters was placed on the backs of turtles and compacted to form the land mass of North America — hence, Turtle Island. This name for the continent gained popularity in modern times in the 1960s and 1970s because of its frequent use by Native American activists and Gary Snyder, an environmentalist and poet.
    The convergence of fortunes (or more aptly— misfortunes) of Native Americans and Africans in North America was nowhere more conspicuous than in the southern Atlantic and mid-Atlantic seaboard states during the 16th through 19th centuries. Spain held the distinction of being the world’s first truly global power. Due in no small part to its mastery of the seas and the fighting capacity of its Spanish Armada, a fleet of warships, Spain was able to dominate early European landgrabs in the so-called New World, especially during the 1500s. While the British concentrated their early colonization efforts in North America on the coastal northeast and mid-Atlantic, Spain extended its hold in South America, Central America, and Mexico into the Carolinas, Georgia, and Florida. The gradual move towards ethnic cleansing of Native American tribes in British-dominated territories coincided with the rapid influx of enslaved Africans in the southern coastal states, including Virginia. Wolofs, Fulas, and Mandinkas from West Africa, particularly the Senegambia region, were deemed especially valuable to Southern farmers because of their rice-growing and other agricultural skills. Upwards to 90 percent of the captives taken from the Senegambia region in the late 1600s through the early 1800s were Muslim. Among the enslaved Africans were Muslim scholars, imams, teachers; and some suggest that in the next ten years, research will show that as many as 45 to 50 percents of individuals ensnared in the trans-Atlantic trade of enslaved Africans were Muslims.
    Native Americans and enslaved Africans were caught in the crosshairs of Britain’s and Spain’s respective quests for social, economic, and political hegemony in North America. As early as 1693, King Charles II of Spain attempted to lure enslaved Africans in British-held territories and Alabama to escape and seek refuge in Spanish-held Florida where they would receive their freedom if they accepted Catholicism. Hence, from the mid-1500s to the mid-1800s, a steady number of enslaved Africans escaped from their immediate places of captivity seeking protection in marshy areas and with Native American tribes. While many remained with the Native American tribes, untold others continued their odyssey through treacherous territory, going further south to the relatively safer environs of Florida. Florida provided the opportunity for those escaping from the chattel slavery of the southern plantations to enter Florida’s armed resistance against the institution of slavery and all its many manifestations.
    Trail of Tears
    Slave patrols and trackers, predecessors to the modern-day police force, were known to travel thousands of miles to retrieve a single escaped African if the bounty was sizeable enough. Florida became the primary battleground for the two defining issues of the era— resistance against both slavery and Native American removal. The forced relocation and appropriation of the ancestral homelands of Native Americans was not officially carried out until the passage by Congress of the Indian Removal Act in 1830. The federal government then forced Native tribes to walk thousands of miles into permanent exile, from North Carolina to the territory designated by the federal government as Indian Territory. Indian Territory was a dismal and barren reservation in the states of Oklahoma and Arizona. The official removal of Native American tribes started in 1838, culminating in one of the most tragic episodes of American callousness towards First Americans. Aptly labeled the Trail of Tears by the crest-fallen tribes forced on this death march, approximately 20,000 died from starvation, exposure to harsh weather conditions, and disease before reaching their destination.
    But not all Cherokees, Creeks, Choctaws, Seminoles, and Chickasaws died on the Trail of Tears or made it to Indian Territory. Hundreds, if not thousands, escaped and returned to their homelands, hiding in the mountains and woodlands. Others sought protection with other tribes, or banded with Native Americans and escaped African slaves to conduct guerrilla-style warfare against plantation owners, slave hunters, and when necessary, other Native Americans who were loyal to the government’s policy of legalized slavery and Native American removal. Florida became the epicenter of resistance against these twin evils long after the 1819 Spanish sale of Florida to the United States for $5 million. Except for 20 years immediately before and during the American Revolution, Florida had been under Spanish authority for nearly 100 years.
    Even though the Spanish people living in Florida had demonstrated their general disdain for Native Americans and Africans in America, it was to their strategic advantage to promulgate discord and armed resistance against their continental archenemies, the British. A significant portion of the breakaway tribal members and their Black allies, for the most part, amalgamated with the Seminole tribe once they arrived in the state of Florida, if not before. Seminoles were Lower Creeks who had broken away from the main body of Creeks after arriving in Florida. Around 1738, the governor of Florida approved a settlement for ex-slaves north of St. Augustine. The Black settlement was called Fort Mose, the first known legally-sanctioned free Black town in North America. Black Seminoles played a vital role, along with their Native American and Black allies, against the slavocracy to their north. During this period, Black Seminoles were recognized as the fiercest and most strategic fighters against federal troops and others attempting to force Native Americans out of Florida and onto reservations in Oklahoma, to reimpose slavery on non-Seminole Blacks, as well as on Black Seminoles.

    The Seminole Wars
    The Seminoles fought three wars against the U.S. government. The First Seminole War started on November 30, 1817 and ended in 1819. The wars were mostly waged against the Seminoles because of the safe-havens they provided to runaway African slaves. Government officials decided that Fort Mose had to be captured by the U.S. army because it symbolized defiance and the promise of freedom for Blacks. At the end of the war, the Seminoles were forced to leave the area of St. Augustine and live on a large reservation in Central Florida. The Second Seminole War lasted from 1835-1842 and was the effort to force the Seminoles to leave Florida and move to Indian Territory.
    Eventually, by 1840, the U.S. army killed the majority of Florida’s Seminole population, deceived Seminole Chiefs Osceola and Micanopy into believing that they were negotiating a truce, and then captured them. Those remaining faced disease and near-starvation in the forced relocation to Indian Territory. Many Seminoles broke away from the forced trek to Oklahoma and escaped to Mexico, some marrying Yaqui Indian women. The Third Seminole War was from 1855-1858. It resulted from settler encroachment on Seminole land. As in the Second Seminole War, the brave and defiant Seminole warriors were outmatched by the superior firepower of the United States Army. However, the Seminoles justifiably claim that they are the only indigenous tribe in North America whose hostilities with the U.S. Army ended in a truce and not formal surrender.
    The history of the interaction among Africans in America, Native Americans, and Muslims remains an under-researched discipline. There are still undisclosed secrets about the crucible of Turtle Island waiting to be discovered.

  • The ‘Liberation’ of Libya: Death of a Nation

    The ‘Liberation’ of Libya: Death of a Nation

    Much of the world was aghast as CNN broadcast the gruesome images of Black Africans, bound and tethered like animals, being prepared for sale in a stockyard bustling with potential buyers. This market in the former Italian colony of Libya was auctioning not camels or goats, but people, human beings to be bought and used as slaves. The assault on one’s sense of reality and justice continued as scenes of captive men, and some women and children, were terrorized by goons wielding guns, sticks, batons, and even machetes.
    As if media-captured scenes of flesh peddling were not revolting enough to jar human sensibilities, some former captives related that their organs had been harvested, against their will and with little to no regard for sanitary conditions or anesthesia. Libya has become the major transit point for illegal immigrants trying to flee griping poverty in their home countries such as Nigeria, Gambia, Ghana, and Ethiopia. Even though over 3,000 Africans have perished each year since 2013 in the journey to Europe to pursue a better life, according to the UN agency, the International Organization for Migration, thousands continue to embark on this perilous trek. After arriving in the North African nation, migrants are crammed into detention centers that are grossly over-crowded, festering grounds for robbery, rape, and murder, as detailed in a recent United Nations report.

    Libya today is a failed state, mired in chaos, destruction and killing by warring factions, and infiltration of ISIS and other extremist fighters

    Libya today is a failed state, mired in chaos, destruction and killing by warring factions, and infiltration of ISIS and other extremist fighters. The political turmoil and lawlessness follows Western intervention in 2011 when NATO forces, in conjunction with strategic and intelligence support, and naval missiles from the United States, bombed Libya in a concerted effort to defeat the Libyan military and remove the longest, continuously-reigning leader on the African continent, Muammar Qadhafi. In the aftermath of NATO’s unrelenting aerial assault, government buildings, residents’ housing, infrastructure of the capital, Tripoli, as well as in Benghazi, Sirte, and other population centers, suffered near-total devastation. Libya’s sophisticated desalinization system, high-tech, elaborate irrigation network, extensive telecommunications, and transportation systems were reduced to rubble by the constant bombardment of the country by NATO.
    Colonel Qadhafi led the Free Officers Movement in the September 1, 1969 ouster of Libyan King Idris I. King Idris ruled Libya from the time the nation received its independence in 1951 to his 1969 overthrow. In 1951, Libya was deemed the poorest nation in the world. Six major oil fields were discovered in the country in 1959, with 40 countries given concession contracts to drill and explore for the precious crude. At the time of NATO’s destruction of Libya and the subsequent capture and murder of Qadhafi in the streets by Libyan rebels, Libyan crude was highly valued because of its unusually low sulfur content. Ninety percent of Libya’s oil was sold to Europe, and some political observers contend that NATO’s bombing campaign against Libya was more about securing the sweet Libyan crude for European oil oligarchs than removing a declared dictator.

    Qadhafi: Pariah or Liberator?

    Muammar Qadhafi was considered a political pariah and supporter of terrorism by most Western governments during his 42-year rule in Libya. But to most African, Latin American, and Asian liberation movements, and countries attempting to throw off the yoke of colonialism and neo-colonialism, Qadhafi represented a valued financial and ideological supporter of their political ideals. To many Libyans, Qadhafi was a brutal dictator who abused his power while entrenching his family members and loyalists in power. Other Libyans chose to emphasize the fact that during his rule, Libya had the highest standard of living in Africa; that before Qadhafi, Libya’s literacy rate was 20 percent and under his rule literacy rose to 83 percent of the population; that health care was free and of high quality to every country resident; that housing was considered a human right; that electricity was free; that newly married couples received $50,000 from the government; that the government paid 50 percent of the cost of automobiles for any Libyan; that the government provided free secondary and college education; and that Black Africans were given positions of responsibility in all sectors of Libyan society.

    Shortly after Qadhafi’s extrajudicial execution, freelance and mainstream journalists from around the world began reporting that Black Libyans and Black migrants from sub-Saharan countries were being summarily dismissed from their jobs, harassed, beaten, and even killed by mob violence. NPR’s West African reporter was told by a Turkish oil worker in 2011, “We left behind our friends from Chad. We left behind their bodies. We had 70 or 80 people from Chad working for our company. They [Libyan rebels] cut them dead with pruning shears and axes, attacking them, saying you’re providing troops for Qadhafi. The Sudanese, the Chadians were massacred. We saw it ourselves.” One of the ironies of the “liberation” of Libya by rebels is that many of these same rebels hunted down, lynched, and even massacred Black Africans across Libya, many of whom had been living in the country for decades. These paroxysms of racism and violence were unleashed when the established law and order were destroyed by the removal of Qadhafi.

    In a poignant essay written by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, entitled “The Racialization of the War: Libya and the ‘Clash of Civilizations,’” found in the book “The Illegal War on Libya,” edited by Cynthia McKinney, Nazemroaya writes, “In the eyes of NATO and the so-called West, Libya’s crime was how it distributed and used its wealth, its lack of external debts, and the key role it was attempting to play in continental development and curtailing of external influence in Africa. Tripoli was a spoiler that effectively undermined the interests of the former colonial powers. The Jamahriya (Libya) had taken on some hefty pan-African development plans intended to industrialize Africa and transform it into an integrated and assertive political entity. These initiatives conflicted with the interests of the external powers competing with one another in Africa, but it was especially unacceptable to Washington and the major EU countries. Accordingly, Libya had to be crippled and neutralized as an entity supportive of African progress and pan-African unity.”

    Whatever one thinks about Qadhafi, nothing justifies the disintegration of a viable sovereign nation into a cauldron of violence, disunity, racism, and suffering — a true humanitarian crisis — because another nation or a coalition of nations decided that the leader had to be taken down. While the West spouted noble intentions – “to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack,” taking out a dictator and sending a message to dictators everywhere, or supporting the Libyan “freedom fighters” — these were pretenses intended to conceal much more crass motivations, always revolving around supremacism (exceptionalism, racism, sexism, elitism), greed, and lust for power. Supremacism in all its forms is a virulent cancer, whether it’s used to justify regime change or the enslavement of a human being. Who could believe that in the 21st century we would see images of chattel slavery in real time? But then who would have believed that a man who stokes the fires of racism, fanatic patriotism, sexism, and xenophobia would be elected president of the United States!

  • National “Anti-Bullying” Campaign

    National “Anti-Bullying” Campaign

    ICNA Council for Social Justice Launches National Anti-Bullying Campaign

    Three years ago, Nadia and her older sister made the joint decision, independent of their parents’ input, to wear hijab (head and body covering for Muslim females for the sake of modesty) to their public elementary school. Their mother dresses in full hijab every day that she steps outside of her family’s front door and her daughters have benefited from the example of a strong hijabi mother. Before making the decision to wear hijab to school, Nadia was a popular but quiet girl who was very rarely the target of bullies in her school. All of that changed when the two sisters showed up one day with scarves on their heads and legs and arms covered by loosely-fitting garments. At first, the taunting and bullying was more playful than mean-spirited, but as the weeks and months went by, it became obvious that some of their schoolmates were directing hurtful comments towards them that were echoed from television, older youth, parents, teachers, and even school administrators.
    School bullying in America is as old as one-room school houses with a single teacher for first through the twelfth grades. During the approximately 100-year post-slavery era of racially-segregated public schools, racial homogeneity did not spare children from being ridiculed and picked on by their class and schoolmates. Yet, as the ethnic, racial, and religious composition of schools became more diverse, school bullying increased exponentially. Racial and ethnic epithets werenow hurled at children by their peers and adults. In school districts where racial and religious bigotry dominate the landscape, many children are mercilessly mocked and derided with impunity.Because of the seemingly cavalier attitude taken by far too many teachers and school administrators nationwide, when incidents of bullying are reported to them and they do nothing to stop it, children are being emotionally scarred, some permanently.
    Children from minority populations in this country, such as Jews, Latinos, African Americans, Muslims, Sikhs, and Asians, are routinely on the receiving end of barbed threats, insults, physical intimidation and attacks. As the political climate in America becomes more toxic, even very young children are not spared from verbal and physical torment on a day-to-day basis.Sadly, bullying has become normative behavior against anyone considered different from the majority population group. As a direct result of school and cyberbullying, children, ages 10-14, currently have the highest rate of suicide in the country. Education, social activist, and religious-based groups are taking a nationwide stance to inform and mobilize the American people against bullying and the deleterious effect that this behavior is having on our precious children and the country at large. The Islamic Circle of North America, through its civic engagement division, ICNA Council for Social Justice, is taking a stand against school bullying by waging a year-long national campaign, “Protecting Our Children: Stop School Bullying.”
    The national campaign will be spearheaded by the ICNA Council for Social Justice in conjunction with local units and subunits of ICNA. The organization will utilize its multi-platform social media outlets, billboards, and the mass media to promote the campaign. This national awareness campaign is designed to mobilize diverse demographic populations to take individual and collective actions in their school districts to reduce, if not eliminate, the unacceptable practice of school bullying. Parents, teachers, teacher unions, school administrators and superintendents, and students, themselves, are the target audience of this initiative. Most of the children bullied in school do not report to their parents or school authorities that they have been victimized, primarily for fear of reprisals against them. ICNA Council for Social Justice has established a Justice Hotline, 1 (844) 99-JUSTICE, for individuals to call and report incidents of bullying or other social injustices. In addition, ICNA CSJ will facilitate sensitivity sessions for teachers and school administrators to make them aware of this serious problem and to push them to take appropriate action when incidents of bullying are reported. As part of the national campaign, mayors and city councils will be called upon to establish “Stop Bullying Our Children” days in their areas. School principals will be called upon to hold special assemblies to address bullying in schools and online. Faith community leaders will also be enlisted to help stem this worrisome tide. For additional information, please contact Rameez Abid through the Justice Hotline: (844) 99-Justice; or email scribe51@gmail.com

    ——————————————–

    Effects of Bullying

    • Students who experience bullying are at increased risk for poor school adjustment, sleep difficulties, anxiety, and depression (Center for Disease Control, 2015).
    • Students who engage in bullying behavior are at increased risk for academic problems, substance use, and violent behavior later in adolescence and adulthood (Center for Disease Control, 2015).
    • Students who are both targets of bullying and engage in bullying behavior are at greater risk for both mental health and behavior problems than students who only bully or are only bullied (Center for Disease Control, 2015).
    • Students who experience bullying are twice as likely as non-bullied peers to experience negative health effects such as headaches and stomachaches (Gini & Pozzoli, 2013).
    • Youth who self-blame and conclude they deserved to be bullied are more likely to face negative outcomes, such as depression, prolonged victimization, and maladjustment (Perren, Ettakal, & Ladd, 2013; Shelley & Craig, 2010).
    Source: http://www.pacer.org/bullying/resources/stats.asp

    Bullying and Suicide

    The relationship between bullying and suicide is complex. Many media reports oversimplify this relationship, insinuating or directly stating that bullying can cause suicide. The facts tell a different story. In particular, it is not accurate and potentially dangerous to present bullying as the “cause” or “reason” for a suicide, or to suggest that suicide is a natural response to bullying. We recommend media not use the word “bully-cide.”
    • Research indicates that persistent bullying can lead to or worsen feelings of isolation, rejection, exclusion, and despair, as well as depression and anxiety, which can contribute to suicidal behavior.
    • The vast majority of young people who are bullied do not become suicidal.
    • Most young people who die by suicide have multiple risk factors.
    • Some youth, such as LGBT youth, are at increased risk for suicide attempts even when bullying is not a factor.
    Source: https://www.stopbullying.gov/media/facts/index. html#suicide